Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (8): 658-662    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.08.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析
吕阳1, 乐博昕1, 胡伟宏1, 刘园1, 陈昶1, 刘效峰2
1.上海市宝山区疾病预防控制中心慢性传染病防制科,上海 201901;
2.上海市宝山区疾病预防控制中心,上海 201901
Influencing factors for latent tuberculosis infection among student close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis
LÜ Yang1, LE Boxin1, HU Weihong1, LIU Yuan1, CHEN Chang1, LIU Xiaofeng2
1. Department of Chronic Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China;
2. Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China
全文: PDF(845 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解上海市宝山区肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(LTBI)情况及影响因素,为学生肺结核防制提供依据。方法 选择2021年4月—2023年11月通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统监测报告管理系统、学校报告、疾病预防控制中心通知职业为学生或教职员工的肺结核病例为指示病例,其同校的肺结核密切接触学生为研究对象,收集社会人口学信息、生活方式和结核分枝杆菌检测结果等资料;以结核分枝杆菌检测阳性且排除活动性肺结核为LTBI判定标准。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析肺结核密切接触学生LTBI的影响因素。结果 调查肺结核密切接触学生1 212人,其中男生651人,女生561人,男女比1.16∶1。年龄为(18.48±4.33)岁。检出LTBI 32例,检出率为2.64%。与肺结核病例同宿舍、民办学校、住校和三餐获取途径为外卖的肺结核密切接触学生LTBI检出率较高,分别为9.26%、5.54%、3.54%和6.52%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,与肺结核病例同宿舍(OR=3.604,95%CI:1.256~10.338)、学校性质为民办(OR=2.327,95%CI:1.083~5.003)、三餐获取途径为食堂(OR=9.561,95%CI:2.029~45.057)和外卖(OR=19.222,95%CI:3.528~104.732)的肺结核密切接触学生LTBI风险较高。结论 宝山区肺结核密切接触学生存在LTBI感染风险,主要受到与肺结核病例关系、学校疫情防控力度和饮食习惯的影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吕阳
乐博昕
胡伟宏
刘园
陈昶
刘效峰
关键词 学生肺结核密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染    
AbstractObjective To investigate the prevalence and influencing factors of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among students close contacts diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Baoshan District, Shanghai, so as to provide the basis for the prevention and control of pulmonary tuberculosis among students. Methods Pulmonary tuberculosis cases identified among students or teaching staff were selected as index cases through the Surveillance System of Chinese Disease Prevention and Control Information System, school reports, notification of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from April 2021 to November 2023, and student close contacts in their schools were selected as research subjects. Demographic information, lifestyle and Mycobacterium tuberculosis test results were collected through questionnaires surveys and pulmonary tuberculosis screening. LTBI was defined as a positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis test result with the exclusion of active pulmonary tuberculosis. The influencing factors for LTBI among student close contacts were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 1 212 student close contacts were included, with 651 males and 561 females, resulting in a gender ratio of 1.16︰1. The mean age was (18.48±4.33) years. Among them, 32 cases were detected with LTBI, yielding a detection rate of 2.64%. Higher LTBI detection rates were observed among students who shared the same dormitory with pulmonary tuberculosis cases (9.26%), attended private schools (5.54%), lived on campus (3.54%), and obtained meals through take-out services (6.52%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that sharing the same dormitory with pulmonary tuberculosis cases (OR=3.604, 95%CI: 1.256-10.338), attending a private school (OR=2.327, 95%CI: 1.083-5.003), and three meals a day through canteens (OR=9.561, 95%CI: 2.029-45.057) or through take-out services (OR=19.222, 95%CI: 3.528-104.732) were associated with a higher risk of LTBI. Conclusion The close contacts of students with pulmonary tuberculosis in Baoshan District are at risk of LTBI, which is mainly affected by the degree of contact with tuberculosis cases, the strength of school epidemic prevention and control, and students' eating habits.
Key wordsstudent    pulmonary tuberculosis    close contact    latent tuberculosis infection
收稿日期: 2024-02-06      修回日期: 2024-06-24      出版日期: 2024-08-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2023—2025年)学科人才建设项目(GWVI-11.1-06); 上海市宝山区医学重点专科A类项目(BSZK-2023-A20); 上海市宝山区科学技术委员会科技创新专项资金项目(20-E-57)
作者简介: 吕阳,硕士,主管医师,主要从事结核病防制工作
通信作者: 刘效峰,E-mail:liuxiaofeng@bscdc.org.cn   
引用本文:   
吕阳, 乐博昕, 胡伟宏, 刘园, 陈昶, 刘效峰. 肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 658-662.
LÜ Yang, LE Boxin, HU Weihong, LIU Yuan, CHEN Chang, LIU Xiaofeng. Influencing factors for latent tuberculosis infection among student close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(8): 658-662.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.08.004      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I8/658
[1] HOUBEN R M,DODD P.The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection:a re-estimation using mathematical modelling[J].PLoS Med,2016,13(10):1-13.
[2] World Health Organization.WHO Consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 1:prevention-tuberculosis preventive treatment[Z].Geneva:WHO,2020.
[3] ABUBAKAR I,DROBNIEWSKI F,SOUTHERN J,et al.Prognostic value of interferon-γrelease assays and tuberculin skin test in predicting the development of active tuberculosis(UK PREDICT TB):a prospective cohort study[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2018,18(10):1077-1087.
[4] 国家卫生健康委员会办公厅.关于印发中国结核病预防控制工作技术规范(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].http://wsjkw.gxzf.gov.cn/xxgk_49493/fdzdgk/ggws/jbkz/P020200420356691296321.pdf.
[5] 邱曼玲,江毅,李梦映,等.在校学生结核潜伏感染及预防性治疗研究进展[J].预防医学,2024,36(1):30-33.
[6] 廖龙,陈慧娟,李进岚,等.贵州省2022年学校肺结核接触者筛查结果分析[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(24):4463-4468.
[7] 刘双,李婷,王丹霞,等.2020—2022年四川省学校肺结核患者密切接触者筛查情况分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2024,40(4):355-361.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.关于印发中国学校结核病防控指南(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7923/202012/5f40b53827ae41c5ab7827507d584cab.shtml.
[9] 上海市卫生健康委员会,上海市教育委员会.关于印发上海市学校结核病防控指南(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/jbfk2/20220819/5d0dacc15f5a4a9d8b66dea1f5ede66e.html.
[10] 张旭. 健康信息对睡眠行为的影响[D].厦门:厦门大学,2021.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断:WS 288—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[12] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.结核病分类:WS 196—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[13] 杜永成,林淑芳,戴志松,等.福建省学校结核病疫情后学生接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染状况及其影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2023,45(3):260-264.
[14] 高磊,权竹声,成君,等.结核分枝杆菌感染检测两步法在学校结核病控制工作中的营养探讨[J].中华预防医学杂志,2020,54(4):385-391.
[15] 周林,初乃惠,陆伟.高危人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测及预防性治疗专家共识[J].中国防痨杂志,2021,43(9):874-878.
[16] DU J L,SU Y,DONG E J,et al.LTBI-negative close contacts of tuberculosis are more likely to develop the disease:enlightenment and lessons from a cluster outbreak[J/OL].Front Public Health,2023[2024-06-24].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136355.
[17] 张胜康,童照威,唐寒梅,等.必须重视结核病患者的营养治疗[J].中国防痨杂志,2020,42(12):1272-1275.
[18] 雷蓉蓉,张婷,吴成果,等.南川区居民结核潜伏感染调查[J].预防医学,2022,34(4):371-374.
[19] 陈静,肖筱,吴哲渊,等.上海市徐汇区和长宁区老年2型糖尿病患者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查情况及影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(2):181-186.
[20] 腾子豪,蒋远东,王玥,等.新疆某职业院校新生结核潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(11):1156-1160.
[21] JIN Y,WANG H Q,ZHANG J F,et al.Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among coal workers' pneumoconiosis patients in China:a cross-sectional study[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2018,18[2024-06-24].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5373-1.
[22] 钟涛,詹广兴,范玉铮,等.深圳市南山区高危人群结核菌潜伏感染情况及影响因素[J].中国热带医学,2020,20(8):702-709,716.
[1] 卢巧玲, 徐来潮, 张开漩. 绍兴市老年人群肺结核时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 760-763.
[2] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 杨玉婷, 王静夷, 陈潇潇. 台州市中学生心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 821-824.
[3] 陈高尚, 朱凯强, 朱军礼, 李克. 金华市学生结核病病例发现延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 698-701.
[4] 张琳, 杜昕, 马煜, 刘依妮. 2016—2021年陕西省肺结核流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 706-709.
[5] 李卫丹, 张子根. 一起利福平耐药肺结核聚集性疫情的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 630-632,635.
[6] 王慧, 李锦成, 陆兴, 王金富, 竺丽梅, 刘巧. 重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验筛查HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的效果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 639-643.
[7] 梁薇, 任梦婷, 张文科, 杨琳, 王红雨. 滁州市中小学生脊柱侧弯筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 607-610.
[8] 孙强, 李小勇, 龚清海, 潘文杰, 黄艳. 中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
[9] 唐小芬, 秦道新, 金凤霞, 田园, 邹永霞, 沈玉蓉, 刘瑶, 谢秀钗. 2012—2022年罗湖区肺结核患者利福平和异烟肼耐药分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 536-539.
[10] 黄钦海, 余石群, 陈小敏, 曾煜球. 云浮市中小学生营养不良状况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 402-406.
[11] 钟庆, 熊越华, 梅欣, 黄远霞, 李毅琳, 张志峰. 武汉市高中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 355-358.
[12] 杨娟华, 郎啟智, 李丹, 程远芬, 曹煜. 积极应对方式在医学生健康素养与生活方式间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 189-192.
[13] 孙强, 赵磊, 李小勇, 潘文杰. 2010—2022年鄞州区中小学生跌倒伤害特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 207-210.
[14] 吴玉姣, 左小明, 秦科宇, 张志新, 张兴. 常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 162-164,168.
[15] 李翔, 张秀琴, 李国营, 王琼, 谢曙光, 范传刚. 神农架林区小学生空气污染防护知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 173-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed