Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (2): 162-164,168    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.02.018
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药分析
吴玉姣1, 左小明1, 秦科宇2, 张志新2, 张兴3
1.常州市第三人民医院药事科,江苏 常州 213000;
2.常州市第三人民医院,江苏 常州 213000;
3.常州市疾病预防控制中心,江苏 常州 213000
Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosisin Changzhou City
WU Yujiao1, ZUO Xiaoming1, QIN Keyu2, ZHANG Zhixin2, ZHANG Xing3
1. Department of Pharmacy, Changzhou Third People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China;
2. Changzhou Third People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China;
3. Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Control, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China
全文: PDF(857 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解江苏省常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药情况及其影响因素,为完善耐药结核病防控策略提供依据。方法 选择2020—2022年在常州市结核病定点医院就诊的>60岁肺结核患者为研究对象,收集人口学信息、既往疾病与诊疗史、药敏试验等资料,分析老年肺结核患者利福平耐药情况及其影响因素。结果 共纳入249例老年肺结核患者,年龄为(69.75±4.36)岁。男性147例,女性102例,男女性别比为1.44∶1。初治患者183例,占73.49%;复治患者66例,占26.51%。利福平耐药21例,耐药率为8.43%。其中初治患者7例,耐药率为3.83%;复治患者14例,耐药率为21.21%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,老年肺结核复治患者利福平耐药风险较高(OR=10.551,95%CI:1.344~82.857)。结论 常州市249例老年肺结核患者利福平耐药率为8.43%,治疗类型是利福平耐药的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴玉姣
左小明
秦科宇
张志新
张兴
关键词 老年人肺结核利福平耐药影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the rifampicin resistance status and its influencing factors among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, so as to provide the basis for improving drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis prevention and control strategies. Methods Patients aged over 60 years with pulmonary tuberculosis treated in tuberculosis designated hospital was selected. Demographic information, history of previous disease, history of diagnosis and treatment and drug sensitivity test were collected. Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and its influencing factors was analyzed. Results Totally 249 elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were included, with an average of (69.75±4.36) years. There were 147 males and 102 females, with a gender ratio of 1.44∶1. There were 183 treatment-naïve patients (73.49%) and 66 retreated patients (26.51%). Rifampicin resistance was found in 21 cases, with a drug resistance rate of 8.43%. Among them, there were 7 treatment-naïve patients (3.83%), and 14 retreated patients (21.21%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that retreated elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis had a higher risk of rifampicin resistance (OR=10.551, 95%CI: 1.344-82.857). Conclusion The rifampicin resistance rate of 249 elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis was 8.43% and was associated with the type of treatment.
Key wordsthe elderly    pulmonary tuberculosis    rifampicin resistance    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2023-09-11      修回日期: 2024-01-08      出版日期: 2024-02-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:常州市科技项目(CE20215019,CJ20239024); 天晴医院药学基金项目(Q202145)
作者简介: 吴玉姣,硕士,副主任药师,主要从事临床药学工作
通信作者: 张兴,E-mail:369246694@qq.com   
引用本文:   
吴玉姣, 左小明, 秦科宇, 张志新, 张兴. 常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 162-164,168.
WU Yujiao, ZUO Xiaoming, QIN Keyu, ZHANG Zhixin, ZHANG Xing. Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosisin Changzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(2): 162-164,168.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.02.018      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I2/162
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2022[R/OL].[2024-01-08]. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/TB-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022.
[2] World Health Organization.WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 4:treatment-drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment,2022 update[M]. Geneva:WHO,2022.
[3] LIANG S F,MA J C,WANG G,et al.The application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and drug resistance prediction of pulmonary tuberculosis[J/OL]. Front Med,2022,9 [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.935080.
[4] 舒薇,逄宇,高静韬,等. 中华医学会结核病学分会2022年全国结核病学术大会会议纪要[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2022,45(11):1156-1160.
[5] 中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等. 肺结核基层诊疗指南(2018年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(8):709-717.
[6] 赵雁林. 结核病实验室质量保证手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017.
[7] ASLAM B,KHURSHID M,ARSHAD M I,et al.Antibiotic resistance:one health one world outlook[J/OL]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol,2021,11 [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510.
[8] DEVOID I,SILLAH A K,SUTHERLAND J,et al.The household economic burden of drug-susceptible TB diagnosis and treatment in the Gambia[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2022,26(12):1162-1169.
[9] AIA P,VINEY K,KAL M,et al.The economic burden of TB faced by patients and affected families in Papua New Guinea[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2022,26(10):934-941.
[10] TRAUER J M.Targeted TB control in migrants to low-burden countries[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2023,27(3):169-170.
[11] 王远航,胡洁,葛锐,等. 嘉兴市结核分枝杆菌耐药情况分析[J]. 预防医学,2023,35(8):705-709.
[12] 李仁忠,阮云洲,徐彩红,等. 世界卫生组织利福平耐药结核病患者数估算方法[J]. 中国防痨杂志,2023,45(3):328.
[13] 何昱颖,胡屹,陈玮,等. 2014年至2018年贵州省利福平耐药结核病的危险因素及治疗转归分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志,2021,39(5):289-294.
[14] 王荣,杨晨,丁松宁,等. 南京市复治涂阳肺结核患者耐药状况分析[J]. 预防医学,2019,31(5):478-481.
[15] MUTAYOBA B K,ERSHOVA J,LYAMUYA E,et al.The second national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey in Tanzania,2017-2018[J]. Trop Med Int Health,2022,27(10):891-901.
[16] DE VOS M,SCOTT L,DAVID A,et al. Comparative analytical evaluation of four centralized platforms for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid[J/OL]. J Clin Microbiol,2021,59(3) [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02168-20.
[1] 乔柏杨, 刘薇, 王琪, 刘铮然. 网约配送人员道路交通伤害调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 123-126,130.
[2] 许浩迪, 陈艳, 李鹏, 王玉超. 定海区居民甲状腺结节的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 131-134.
[3] 吕鹤, 常蕊, 杨惠莲, 郭映花, 邢永华. 蔬菜温棚作业人员职业性肌肉骨骼疾患调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 97-100.
[4] 张栗, 周睿, 王蓓佳, 王红妹. 中老年抑郁症状人群平衡能力的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 115-118.
[5] 龚晓雪, 冯玲芳, 陈俊斐, 傅浩, 蒋兆强, 刘爽, 董小雯, 吴帆, 楼建林. 尘肺病患者外周血核糖体DNA拷贝数变化及影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 101-104.
[6] 张梦, 张利, 刘梦雅, 宋楠楠, 周静蕾. 老年人自评健康状况与死亡风险的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 105-108,114.
[7] 牛贺, 王荣环, 鲍筝. 北京市通州区0~3岁儿童发育筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 165-168.
[8] 李菊芳, 鄢志梅, 吴洋, 浦韵卿, 宋冬梅. 昆明市脱贫地区居民健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 177-180,184.
[9] 李翔, 张秀琴, 李国营, 王琼, 谢曙光, 范传刚. 神农架林区小学生空气污染防护知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 173-176.
[10] 见明智, 鲁迪. 绍兴市基层医务人员吸烟调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 181-184.
[11] 夏华, 黄素琼, 周忠贤, 闫润, 叶运莉. 脑卒中高危的在职职工健康管理服务需求调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 17-21.
[12] 宋楠楠, 周静蕾, 张利. 老年人内在能力与跌倒的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 1-4.
[13] 林芳, 刘素贞, 江海燕. 老年2型糖尿病患者营养不良的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 61-64, 69.
[14] 吴政宇, 王德文, 刘正奎. 中老年人群负性情绪在视力问题与心理韧性间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 5-8.
[15] 罗晓蕾, 张嘉文, 江靖雯, 韩雪梅. 某钢铁企业工人职业伤害调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 39-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed