Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (6): 517-521    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.06.013
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金华市244例职业性尘肺病患者生存质量调查
罗进斌1, 何晓庆1, 陈强1, 郭震1, 罗紫屹2
1.金华市疾病预防控制中心环境与职业卫生科,浙江 金华 321002;
2.浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院,浙江 杭州 310020
Quality of life among 244 patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in Jinhua City
LUO Jinbin1, HE Xiaoqing1, CHEN Qiang1, GUO Zhen1, LUO Ziyi2
1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Jinhua Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321002, China;
2. Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China
全文: PDF(772 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省金华市职业性尘肺病患者的生存质量,为提升职业性尘肺病患者生存质量提供依据。方法 通过国家职业病及健康危害因素监测信息系统检索2009—2021年金华市职业性尘肺病现患病例为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集人口学信息、尘肺病诊断、尘肺病分期、肺功能状况和医疗费用等资料,采用中文版生存质量量表(SF-36)评估生存质量,描述性分析不同疾病分期、肺功能状况、诊疗费用支出和文化程度的职业性尘肺病患者的生存质量。结果 调查职业性尘肺病患者244例,其中男性225例,占92.21%;年龄为(75.20±9.42)岁;发病接尘时间为(13.11±9.89)年。生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、一般健康状况、精力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康维度的生存质量评分分别为(64.03±31.22)、(45.14±44.22)、(56.34±26.60)、(40.80±19.80)、(59.14±17.35)、(68.41±19.67)、(47.03±44.08)和(61.15±17.06)分,均低于常模(P<0.05)。Ⅲ期尘肺病患者生理功能、躯体疼痛和精力维度评分[(31.17±23.40)、(45.21±19.50)和(47.00±20.70)分]较低;肺功能重度损伤患者生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、一般健康状况、精力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康维度评分[(32.27±24.24)、(12.88±30.70)、(37.44±20.43)、(14.76±17.17)、(38.79±19.33)、(53.33±17.08)、(9.09±26.71)和(53.21±17.25)分]较低;诊疗费用个人支付占家庭年收入30%及以上的患者生理功能、躯体疼痛、一般健康状况、精力、社会功能和精神健康维度评分[(30.97±27.40)、(37.77±24.34)、(19.10±18.62)、(38.39±23.78)、(55.89±21.00)和(55.35±20.35)分]较低;高中及以上学历患者生理功能和生理职能维度评分[(66.36±17.33)和(59.09±45.10)分]较高(均P<0.05)。结论 本次调查的金华市职业性尘肺病患者生存质量较差,疾病分期、肺功能状况、医疗费用和文化程度均会影响患者的生存质量。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
罗进斌
何晓庆
陈强
郭震
罗紫屹
关键词 职业性尘肺病生存质量职业病    
AbstractObjective To investigate the quality of life among patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide insights into improving the quality of life among patients with occupational pneumoconiosis. Methods Patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in Jinhua City from 2009 to 2021 were retrieved from the National Occupational Disease and Health Risk Factors Monitoring Information System. Participants' demographics, diagnosis of pneumoconiosis, stage of pneumoconiosis, pulmonary function and medical expense were collected through questionnaire surveys, and the quality of life was measured using a Chinese version of the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The quality of life was descriptively analyzed among patients with occupational pneumoconiosis by disease stage, pulmonary function, expense for disease diagnosis and treatment and educational level. Results A total of 244 patients with occupational pneumoconiosis were enrolled, including 225 men (92.21%). The participants had a mean age of (75.20±9.42) years, and mean duration from dust contact to pneumoconiosis onset of (13.11±9.89) years. The scores for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health were (64.03±31.22), (45.14±44.22), (56.34±26.60), (40.80±19.80), (59.14±17.35), (68.41±19.67), (47.03±44.08) and (61.15±17.06) points among patients with occupational pneumoconiosis, which were all lower than the national constant (P<0.05). Lower scores were measured for physical functioning [(31.17±23.40) points], bodily pain [(45.21±19.50) points] and vitality [(47.00±20.70) points] among patients with stage Ⅲ occupational pneumoconiosis, for physical functioning [(32.27±24.24) points], role-physical [(12.88±30.70) points], bodily pain [(37.44±20.43) points], general health [(14.76±17.17) points], vitality [(38.79±19.33) points], social functioning [(53.33±17.08) points], role-emotional [(9.09±26.71) points], and mental health [(53.21±17.25) points] among occupational pneumoconiosis patients with severe pulmonary function damages, and for physical functioning [(30.97±27.40) points], bodily pain [(37.77±24.34) points], general health [(19.10±18.62) points], vitality [(38.39±23.78) points], social functioning [(55.89±21.00) points] and mental health [(55.35±20.35) points] among occupational pneumoconiosis patients that had personal payments for pneumoconiosis diagnosis and treatment expenses exceeding 30% of annual household incomes, while higher scores were measured for physical functioning [(66.36±17.33) points] and role-physical [(59.09±45.10) points] among occupational pneumoconiosis patients with an educational level of high school and above (all P<0.05). Conclusions The quality of life was low among occupational pneumoconiosis patients in Jinhua City from 2009 to 2021. Stage of pneumoconiosis, pulmonary function, medical expenses and educational level were identified as factors affecting the quality of life among occupational pneumoconiosis patients in Jinhua City.
Key wordsoccupational pneumoconiosis    quality of life    occupational disease
收稿日期: 2023-02-08      修回日期: 2023-04-28      出版日期: 2023-06-10
中图分类号:  R135.2  
基金资助:金华市科学技术研究计划项目(2020-4-080)
作者简介: 罗进斌,本科,主任医师,主要从事职业病防治工作
通信作者: 罗紫屹,E-mail:1094187109@qq.com   
引用本文:   
罗进斌, 何晓庆, 陈强, 郭震, 罗紫屹. 金华市244例职业性尘肺病患者生存质量调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 517-521.
LUO Jinbin, HE Xiaoqing, CHEN Qiang, GUO Zhen, LUO Ziyi. Quality of life among 244 patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in Jinhua City. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(6): 517-521.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.06.013      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I6/517
[1] 方积乾. 生存质量测定方法及应用[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000.
[2] 陈芳妮,于健,杨娟,等.糖尿病视网膜病变患者生存质量现状及影响因素分析[J].国际护理学杂志,2018,37(2):187-189.
[3] 邹华,张美辨,方兴林,等.浙江省尘肺病直接经济损失研究[J].浙江预防医学,2015,27(12):1210-1212.
[4] 皮海峰,马鸣岳,杨淑琴.西安市2016—2017年尘肺病患者生存质量及治疗现状分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2018,36(8):977-979.
[5] 浦娟,范琳波,木云珍,等.云南省昭通市农民工尘肺病患者生存质量分析[J].中国职业医学,2019,46(2):184-187.
[6] 陈文红. 220例矽肺病患者的生存质量及其影响因素[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2015,33(2):116-118.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业性尘肺病的诊断:GBZ 70—2015[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[8] BRITO K,EDIRIMANNE S,ESLICK G D.The extent of improvement of health-related quality of life as assessed by the SF 36 and Paseika scales after parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Surg,2015,13:245-249.
[9] 中华医学会呼吸病学会肺功能专业组.肺功能检查指南(第二部分):肺量计检查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2014,37(7):481-486.
[10] 潘廷芳,司超增,何慧婧,等.我国6省市人群的健康相关生命质量研究[J].基础医学与临床,2011,31(6):636-641.
[11] 罗爱武,彭波,白香连,等.522例新诊断的尘肺病病例肺功能损伤情况及其影响因素[J].职业与健康,2017,33(3):310-312.
[12] 周勇,贺婉婷,黎亚樊,等.郴州市尘肺病患者生存质量及其影响因素[J].湖南学院学报(医学版),2020,23(3):49-53.
[13] 佟岩,孔云燕,边浩,等.1963—2020年石嘴山市职业性尘肺病生存状况及疾病负担变化趋势分析[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2022,40(5):341-347.
[14] 李德鸿,赵金垣,李涛.中华职业医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2019.
[1] 何晓庆, 罗进斌, 陈强, 魏芳. 2009—2021年金华市职业性尘肺病疾病负担分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 620-624.
[2] 景正伟, 宁艳, 常文辉, 周超, 任强, 董丽芳, 贾华, 许诗瑶, 王志锋. 高校MSM人群HIV感染学生生存质量分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 291-294.
[3] 刘弢, 张鹏, 张传会, 李辉. 2016—2020年湖州市疑似职业病报告病例特征及诊断情况[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 696-699.
[4] 谭强, 顾春晖, 王茂, 江爱丽, 李荣宗, 郭, 李旭东, 陈松根, 温贤忠. 广东省职业病发病的空间分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 119-123.
[5] 高美伶, 金永富, 易井萍. 某卫浴洁具制造企业职业病危害现状分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 191-195.
[6] 阮晓颖, 傅红, 朱霖, 俞爱青, 王强, 张磊, 张美辨. 某垃圾生态填埋场项目职业病危害风险预评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(12): 1193-1199.
[7] 边阳甫, 彭艳, 钟皓成. 杭州市6例职业性放射性白内障病例分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 526-527,530.
[8] 郑剑, 赵丽娜, 王大勇, 张鹤美, 胡允雷, 陈丽秀. 温州市美沙酮维持治疗患者生存质量及影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(8): 777-781.
[9] 蒋兆强, 林松, 郭心念, 冯玲芳, 张敏, 余珉, 汪严华, 马明强, 楼建林. 浙江省职业健康检查和职业病诊断服务满意度调查[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(7): 649-652,659.
[10] 景兴科, 杨海峰. 艾滋病患者心理社会因素与生存质量的相关性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(7): 724-726.
[11] 赵秋华, 南菲菲, 傅素芬, 邢赛春, 吴齐. 杭州市周边县区残疾人生存质量现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(5): 457-459,463.
[12] 柴剑荣, 钱亚玲, 路艳艳, 徐承敏, 潘吉, 吴昊. 汽车维修企业职业病危害现状及风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(11): 1115-1118.
[13] 郑夏雯, 王小林, 聂臻, 郑钊, 刘斯峰, 沈爱新. 衢州市601例尘肺病患者流行病学分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(7): 709-710,713.
[14] 芦丽嫦, 张峰, 胡艳敏, 戴正, 钟鹏飞, 季惠华. 宁海县企业工作场所职业病危害因素监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(7): 729-730,734.
[15] 虞龙, 张旭慧, 王强, 杨章萍, 吴小辉, 张磊. 某公司照明光源与LED光源增产改建项目职业病危害控制效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(3): 298-301.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed