Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (2): 194-197    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.02.018
  健康教育 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
渔民现场急救培训戴明环管理效果评价
张乾通1, 廖海东2
1.舟山市急救指挥中心办公室,浙江 舟山 316021;
2.浙江省舟山市急救指挥中心,浙江 舟山 316021
Evaluation of the effectiveness of on-site first-aid training amongfishermen using the Deming Circle
ZHANG Qiantong1, LIAO Haidong2
1. Administration Office, Zhoushan Ambulance Cencer, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316021, China;
2. Zhoushan Ambulance Center, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316021, China
全文: PDF(791 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价戴明环管理在渔民现场急救培训中的效果,为提高渔民现场急救知识和技能水平提供参考。方法 选择浙江省舟山市普陀区男性出海作业渔民为研究对象,分别纳入干预组和对照组。对照组采用常规急救知识讲座培训,干预组采用戴明环管理;通过问卷调查和现场急救技能操作评估培训前后2组渔民现场急救知识、现场急救意识、现场急救技能和急救培训满意度。结果 纳入调查327人,有效调查273人,调查有效率为83.49%。对照组132人,干预组141人。2组渔民的年龄和文化程度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组现场急救知识得分,主动学习现场急救知识、主动消除安全隐患和主动开展现场急救的比例,心肺复苏、创伤急救、气道异物处置和报警技巧的具备率的提升幅度均大于对照组(P<0.05)。培训后,干预组满意度评分[(9.13±0.49)分]高于对照组[(7.08±0.72)分,P<0.05];继续纳入戴明环管理意愿评分[(65.13±3.11)分]高于对照组[(43.62±3.79)分,P<0.05]。结论 运用戴明环管理的渔民现场急救培训效果优于传统急救培训。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张乾通
廖海东
关键词 戴明环渔民现场急救效果评价    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effectiveness of the Demin Circle in on-site first-aid training among fishermen, so as to provide insights into improving the on-site first-aid knowledge and skills among fishermen. Methods Deep-sea male fishermen were sampled from Putuo District of Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province and randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. Participants in the control group received training pertaining to conventional first-aid knowledge, while participants in the intervention group were given the Deming Circle. The knowledge, awareness and skills of on-site first-aid, and satisfaction with the first-aid training were evaluated among fishermen before and after the training using questionnaire surveys and on-site first-aid skill operations. Results A total of 327 questionnaires were allocated, and 273 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 83.49%. There were 132 respondents in the control group and 141 in the intervention group, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age or educational level ( P>0.05 ). The increase of the score of on-site first-aid knowledge, proportion of active learning of on-site first-aid knowledge, proportion of active elimination of potential dangers and proportion of active implementation of on-site first-aid, and seizing the skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, trauma first-aid, airway foreign body disposal and calling the police were all higher in the intervention group than in the control group ( P<0.05 ). Following training, the score of satisfaction with the training was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group [( 9.13±0.49 ) vs. ( 7.08±0.72 ) points, P<0.05 ], and the score of willingness to continue the enrollment in the Deming Circle was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group [( 65.13±3.11 ) vs. ( 43.62±3.79 ) points, P<0.05 ]. Conclusion Deming Circle is superior to conventional first-aid training for improving the effectiveness of on-site first-aid training among fishermen.
Key wordsDeming Circle    fishermen    on-site first-aid    effectiveness evaluation
收稿日期: 2021-11-12      修回日期: 2021-12-22      出版日期: 2022-02-10
中图分类号:  R195  
基金资助:舟山市科技计划项目(2018C31120)
通信作者: 张乾通,E-mail: 79696166@qq.com   
作者简介: 张乾通,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事慢性非传染性疾病控制工作.
引用本文:   
张乾通, 廖海东. 渔民现场急救培训戴明环管理效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 194-197.
ZHANG Qiantong, LIAO Haidong. Evaluation of the effectiveness of on-site first-aid training amongfishermen using the Deming Circle. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(2): 194-197.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.02.018      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I2/194
[1] 廖海东,颜雄,张乾通.海岛意外伤害病例流行特征及院前救治情况分析[J].中国医院统计,2021,28(2):108-111.
LIAO H D,YAN X,ZHANG Q T.Epidemiological characteristics and pre-hospital treatment of accidental injuries in islands[J].Chin J Hosp Stat,2021,28(2):108-111.
[2] 黄海溶,崔员霞,孙早喜.海南省海口地区渔民职业伤害现况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2013,34(8):855-856.
HUANG H R,CUI Y X,SUN Z X.A cross-sectional study on the occupational injuries among fishermen in Haikou,Hainan province[J].Chin J Epidemiol,2013,34(8):855-856.
[3] 丁思丝,冯铁男,姜成华.渔民伤害与海上急救现况研究[C]//2015第十一届全国中西医结合灾害医学大会暨江苏省中西医结合学会第二届灾害医学学术会议论文集,2015:116-120.
DING S S,FENG T N,JIANG C H.Study on the current situation of fishermen's injury and maritime first aid[C]//The 11th National Conference on disaster medicine of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine,the academic proceedings of the second academic conference on disaster medicine of Jiangsu society of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine(2015),2015:116-120.
[4] 姜磊. 教学活动中的PDCA循环[J].黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估),2006,10:77-78.
JIANG L.PDCA loop in teaching activities[J].Heilongjiang Educ(High Educ Res Eval),2006,10:77-78.
[5] 鲁菁,张越巍,曹亚丽,等.临床医师对临床监察员满意度调查分析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2012,28(6):455-459.
LU J,ZHANG Y W,CAO Y L,et al.Investigation of clinicians'satisfaction on clinical research associates[J].Chin J Hosp Admin,2012,28(6):455-459.
[6] 梅媛. 长沙市居民心肺复苏知信行现状及培训效果研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2013.
MEI Y.The current situation of KAP about CPR and research on training effectiveness of residents in Changsha[D].Changsha:Central South University,2013.
[7] 彭迎春,王亚东,关丽征,等.特殊人群的急救培训现状和存在的问题及对策[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(12):1097-1099.
PENG Y C,WANG Y D,GUAN L Z,et al.Training status,problems and solutions in first aid for special population[J].Chin Gen Pract,2009,12(12):1097-1099.
[8] 史晓伟,张新定.国内外现场急救知识与技能普及的现状[J].现代预防医学,2015,41(16):2961-2963.
SHI X W,ZHANG X D.Current situation on the popularization of the first aid knowledge and skills in domestic and foreign fields[J].Mod Prev Med,2015,41(16):2961-2963.
[9] 付忻,冯铁男,王朝昕,等.国内外公众现场急救知识普及和培训现状[J].中华卫生应急电子杂志,2015,1(3):231-233.
FU X,FENG T N,WANG C X,et al.Current situation of popularization and training of public on-site first aid knowledge at home and abroad[J].Chin J Hyg Rescue,2015,1(3):231-233.
[10] 廖海东,夏追平,刘文琴,等.舟山海岛新区渔民院前急救知识培训现状调查[J].中国乡村医药,2019,26(23):50-51.
LIAO H D,XIA Z P,LIU W Q,et al.Investigation on the training situation of pre-hospital care knowledge for fishermen in Zhoushan Island New Area[J].Chin J Rural Med Pharm,2019,26(23):50-51.
[1] 李萍萍, 袁芳, 吴锋, 叶莉霞. 2型糖尿病患者流感疫苗接种综合干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(9): 930-932.
[2] 杨红利, 刘春, 张艳梅. 肝硬化患者知信行健康教育效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(7): 744-747.
[3] 梁珊燕, 马晓, 陈小英, 徐明, 楼永良, 许小敏. 医院环境汽化过氧化氢消毒效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(6): 617-619.
[4] 潘琴琴, 俞梅华, 蔡道盈, 赵妍. 吴兴区2型糖尿病患者家庭医生签约服务效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 499-501,504.
[5] 侯秀丽, 陈丽芬, 包妮娜, 巨蓓. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我管理小组干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(10): 1065-1067.
[6] 章福珍, 徐亚芳, 王蓓蓓, 李欢龙. 持续质量改进预防催产素引产致急产的效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(9): 953-954,957.
[7] 唐志华,徐浩锋,费扬,史东明,陈坤. 社区2型糖尿病患者药学干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(8): 799-802.
[8] 陈临节,张治芬. 老年性阴道炎雌激素治疗效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(6): 642-643.
[9] 刘兰英, 骆利元, 朱春青, 王佩蓉, 杨春玉, 宁芳. 文拉法辛防治不同中医证型重性抑郁障碍效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 459-462.
[10] 刘晓林, 黄雄昂, 林坚, 朱悦红. 糖尿病前期人群体适能干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 471-474,478.
[11] 宓云峰, 励丽, 胡芳芳, 徐淼, 刘佳宁, 陈艳曙. 两种不同频率运动对肥胖患者的干预效果比较[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(4): 367-369,373.
[12] 杨微波, 吴建宏, 张建祥. 社区高血压患者家庭医生签约管理效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(3): 294-295.
[13] 钱蕾, 夏庆华, 张佳蕾. 防跌倒工具包干预效果评估[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(11): 1177-1179.
[14] 罗国良, 彭亚仙, 潘琴琴, 杨俊超. 2型糖尿病患者社区综合干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(9): 952-954.
[15] 胡跃强, 孙美娇, 朱远征. 金华市某高中学生重点传染病防治知识健康教育效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(9): 955-957.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed