Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2021, Vol. 33 Issue (7): 675-678,684    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2021.07.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
抑郁障碍患者工作记忆损害研究
余鸽1, 娄乐2, 徐方忠1,2
1.浙江省立同德医院临床心理科,浙江 杭州 310012;
2.浙江理工大学应用心理学系
Impairment of working memory in patients with depressive disorder
YU Ge*, LOU Le, XU Fangzhong
*Department of Clinical Psychology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
全文: PDF(792 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析不同程度抑郁障碍患者工作记忆损害差异及其影响因素,为抑郁障碍认知功能的临床评估提供依据。方法 选择2019年1月—2020年11月在某三甲医院精神科和临床心理科就诊的抑郁障碍患者为调查对象,收集患者的人口学信息、病程和服药等资料,采用心理健康测查表(PHI)中的抑郁亚量表(Dep)评估患者抑郁障碍程度,采用N-back任务评估患者工作记忆损害程度,分析不同程度抑郁障碍患者N-back任务错误率和反应时差异;采用多重线性回归模型分析抑郁障碍患者工作记忆损害的影响因素。结果 纳入抑郁障碍患者75例,其中轻度抑郁障碍45例,中重度抑郁障碍30例。N-back任务结果显示,轻度和中重度抑郁障碍患者3-back任务错误率分别为(27.47±20.59)%和(39.60±25.95)%,0-back、1-back、2-back和3-back任务反应时分别为(458.29±104.19)ms和(527.90±99.58)ms,(499.87±85.46)ms和(574.57±126.25)ms,(567.44±114.86)ms和(675.37±137.54)ms以及(663.76±167.99)ms和(753.27±152.06)ms,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,抑郁障碍严重程度是0-back~3-back任务反应时和3-back任务错误率的影响因素,服药是0-back任务反应时的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 不同程度抑郁障碍患者工作记忆损害存在差异,与抑郁障碍严重程度和服用抗抑郁药物有关。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余鸽
娄乐
徐方忠
关键词 抑郁障碍工作记忆N-back任务认知功能    
AbstractObjective To analyze the working memory impairment in patients with different degrees of depressive disorder and its influencing factors, so as to provide the basis for the clinical evaluation of cognitive function in patients with depressive disorder. Methods From January 2019 to November 2020, the patients with depressive disorder were selected in the psychiatry and clinical psychology departments of a tertiary hospital. Demographic information, disease course and medication were collected. Depression subscale ( DEP ) of Mental Health Inventory ( PHI ) was used to measure the degree of depressive disorder. N-back tasks were used to test working memory, with error rate and reaction time as experimental variables to compare the working memory impairment of patients with different degrees of depressive disorder. The multivariate linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for working memory impairment in patients with depressive disorder. Results A total of 75 patients with depressive disorder were included, including 45 mild cases and 30 moderate and severe cases. The error rates of mild cases and moderate and severe cases in the 3-back task were ( 27.47±20.59 )% and ( 39.60±25.95 )%, the response time between the two groups in 0-back, 1-back, 2-back and 3-back task were ( 458.29±104.19 ) ms and ( 527.90±99.58 )ms,( 499.87±85.46 ) ms and ( 574.57±126.25 ) ms, ( 567.44±114.86 ) ms and ( 675.37±137.54 ) ms, ( 663.76±167.99 ) ms and ( 753.27±152.06 ) ms, the differences between two groups were significant ( P<0.05 ). The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the severity of depressive disorder was correlated with the response time of 0-back to 3-back tasks and the error rate of 3-back task; whether patients took medicine or not was depressive disorder correlated with the 0-back task response time ( all P<0.05 ). Conclusion There are differences in working memory impairment among patients with different degrees of depressive disorder and the severity of impairment is correlated with the severity of depressive disorder and the use of antidepressant drugs.
Key wordsdepressive disorder    working memory    N-back task    cognitive function
收稿日期: 2021-01-27      修回日期: 2021-05-21     
中图分类号:  R749.4  
基金资助:浙江省软科学研究计划(2021C35114)
通信作者: 徐方忠,E-mail:fangzhongxu@163.com   
作者简介: 余鸽,硕士,主管技师,主要从事心理咨询、心理治疗、心理评估工作
引用本文:   
余鸽, 娄乐, 徐方忠. 抑郁障碍患者工作记忆损害研究[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 675-678,684.
YU Ge, LOU Le, XU Fangzhong. Impairment of working memory in patients with depressive disorder. Preventive Medicine, 2021, 33(7): 675-678,684.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2021.07.006      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2021/V33/I7/675
[1] BADDELEY A.The fraction of working memory[J].PNAS,1996,93(24):134-138.
[2] 孙丽君,王希林,黄悦勤.抑郁障碍患者缓解期认知功能损害研究[J].预防医学,2016,28(7):658-661,665.
[3] 王雪. 大学生抑郁情绪对工作记忆影响的研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2017.
[4] STEVAN N,TAN Y Y,SCHWAAB A,et al.An investigation of working memory deficits in depression using the n-back task:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Affect Disord,2021,284:1-8.
[5] 鲍枫,潘伟刚,毛佩贤,等.中重度晚发抑郁症患者的神经认知功能损害[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(6):442-446.
[6] LEE R S C,HERMENS D F,PORTER M A,et al.A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode Major Depressive Disorder[J].J Affect Disord,2012,140(2):113-124.
[7] 美国精神医学学会.精神障碍诊断与统计手册(案头参考书)[M].5版.北京:北京大学出版社,2014:25-27.
[8] 宋维真,莫文彬.心理健康测查表(PHI)的编制过程[J].心理科学,1992(2):38-42,67.
[9] 段敬利,潘伟盟,穆俊林,等.不同程度抑郁症患者认知功能及事件相关电位P300的研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2017,27(5):327-330.
[10] LI M,FENG L,LIU X W,et al.Emotional working memory in patients with major depressive disorder[J].J Int Med Res,2018,46(5):1734-1746.
[11] NOORT M,BOSCH P,KUEPPENBENDER N,et a1.Verbal working memory capacity in patients with chronic schizophrenia,chronic depression,and healthy participants[J].Eur Psychiatry,2010,25(10):222-231.
[12] 帕丽扎提·木合塔尔,买合甫来提·坎吉,徐向东,等.抑郁症患者工作记忆容量不足研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2017,43(3):180-184.
[13] HARVEY P O,BASTARD G L,POCHON J B.Executive functions and updating of the contents of working memory in unipolar depression[J].J Psychiatr Res,2010,189(8):100-111.
[14] WATTERS A J,CARPENTER J S,HARRIS A W F,et al.Characterizing neurocognitive markers of familial risk for depression using multi-modal imaging,behavioral and self-report measures[J].J Affect Disord,2019,253:336-342.
[15] WANG X L,DU M Y,CHEN T L,et al.Neural correlates during working memory processing in major depressive disorder[J].Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry,2015,56:101-108.
[16] LE T M,BORGHI J A,KUJAWA A J,et al.Alterations in visual cortical activation and connectivity with prefrontal cortex during working memory updating in major depressive disorder[J]. Neuroimage Clin,2017,14:43-53.
[17] SMITH J,BROWNING M,CONEN S,et al.Vortioxetine reduces BOLD signal during performance of the N-back working memory task:a randomised neuroimaging trial in remitted depressed patients and healthy controls[J].Mol Psychiatry,2018,23(5):1127-1133.
[18] 简炜颖,关力杰,黄建伟,等.难治性抑郁症与首发抑郁症患者认知功能的对比研究[J].天津医药,2017,45(12):1275-1278.
[19] 刘治港,赵晓峰,张会杰,等.反复发作抑郁症患者认知功能损害研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2019,28(7):636-641.
[20] 娄乐. 抑郁症患者认知功能损害及其影响因素初步研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2015.
[21] 谢慧,罗跃嘉,张丹丹.基于N-back任务的抑郁群体工作记忆更新研究进展和展望[J].心理学通讯,2019,2(1):43-49.
[1] 余鸽, 娄乐, 徐方忠. 记忆任务指标评估抑郁障碍风险研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 687-691.
[2] 黄文, 李金, 陈奇峰. 老年人认知功能损害的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1130-1133.
[3] 支尼亚, 顾利慧, 沈小华, 陈丽珠, 王剑铃. 疗休养老年人认知功能训练效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(3): 314-315,319.
[4] 张艳梅, 杨红利, 孙光月. 帕金森病患者功能锻炼依从性及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 136-139,143.
[5] 程韬, 应翔, 张俊英, 吕跃忠. 晚发抑郁症患者抑郁程度与神经认知功能的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(1): 42-45,50.
[6] 朱心红, 李傅冬, 吴因平. 60岁及以上老年人群认知功能障碍及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(7): 685-687,692.
[7] 刘兰英, 骆利元, 朱春青, 王佩蓉, 杨春玉, 宁芳. 文拉法辛防治不同中医证型重性抑郁障碍效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 459-462.
[8] 钟素亚, 仝振东, 胡本祥, 袁相波, 陈炜, 张芬娜, 余晴. 舟山市社区老年人轻度认知功能损害影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(2): 170-172,175.
[9] 孙丽君, 王希林, 黄悦勤. 抑郁障碍患者缓解期认知功能损害研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(7): 658-661,665.
[10] 应旭华, 李松涛, 翟羽佳, 尚晓鹏, 何凡, 沈伟. 老年人脉压差与认知功能的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(11): 1119-1122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed