Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (7): 666-670    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.07.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
四川省肺结核患者密切接触者筛查结果分析
熊燕, 夏岚, 李运葵, 钟引, 王丹霞, 李婷
四川省疾病预防控制中心,四川 成都 610041
Screening results for close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Sichuan Province
XIONG Yan, XIA Lan, LI Yunkui, ZHONG Yin, WANG Danxia, LI Ting
Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
全文: PDF(812 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析四川省肺结核患者密切接触者活动性肺结核、结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(LTBI)筛查结果,分析影响因素,为优化分层管理策略,推动预防性治疗提供依据。方法 通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统结核病管理信息系统收集2025年四川省登记的活动性肺结核患者资料,采用《2025年肺结核患者密切接触者个案筛查登记表》收集肺结核患者密切接触者资料。依据WS 288—2017《肺结核诊断》诊断活动性肺结核,结核分枝杆菌感染阳性者经临床评估排除活动性肺结核判定为LTBI。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析肺结核患者密切接触者活动性肺结核、LTBI的影响因素。结果 2025年四川省新登记肺结核患者25 451例,登记肺结核患者密切接触者65 459例,密切接触者与肺结核患者登记比为2.57∶1。密切接触者中男性28 902例,占44.15%;女性36 557例,占55.85%。年龄以41~<61岁为主,22 856例占34.92%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,41~<61岁的密切接触者活动性肺结核风险较低(OR=0.721,95%CI:0.574~0.905),家庭内接触(OR=1.274,95%CI:1.012~1.604)、有肺结核可疑症状(OR=12.979,95%CI:9.361~17.996)和病原学阳性肺结核患者(OR=1.385,95%CI:1.071~1.791)的密切接触者活动性肺结核风险较高;≥21岁(21~<41岁,OR=1.627,95%CI:1.471~1.800;41~<61岁,OR=2.113,95%CI:1.933~2.310;≥61岁,OR=1.731,95%CI:1.573~1.905)、家庭内接触(OR=1.092,95%CI:1.012~1.178)、有肺结核可疑症状(OR=4.170,95%CI:3.326~5.229)和病原学阳性肺结核患者(OR=1.403,95%CI:1.283~1.534)的密切接触者LTBI风险较高。结论 四川省肺结核患者密切接触者活动性肺结核、LTBI与年龄、接触类型、肺结核可疑症状和肺结核患者病原学结果有关。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
熊燕
夏岚
李运葵
钟引
王丹霞
李婷
关键词 肺结核密切接触者活动性肺结核结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查    
AbstractObjective To analyze the screening results and influencing factors of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among close contacts of PTB patients in Sichuan Province, so as to provide the evidence for optimizing hierarchical management strategies and promoting preventive treatment. Methods Data of newly registered active PTB patients in Sichuan Province in 2025 were extracted from the Tuberculosis Management Information System of China Disease Prevention and Control Information System. Information on close contacts of PTB patients was collected using the 2025 Individual Screening Registration Form for Close Contacts of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients. Active pulmonary tuberculosis was diagnosed according to WS 288—2017 Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Individuals with positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection who were clinically evaluated to have excluded active pulmonary tuberculosis were classified as having LTBI. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to identify influencing factors for active PTB and LTBI among close contacts. Results A total of 25 451 newly registered PTB patients and 65 459 corresponding close contacts were recorded in Sichuan Province in 2025, with a contact-to-patient registration ratio of 2.57:1. Among all close contacts, 28 902 (44.15%) were males and 36 557 (55.85%) were females. The age group of 41-<61 years accounted for the largest proportion (22 856, 34.92%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that close contacts aged 41-<61 years had a lower risk of developing active PTB (OR=0.721, 95%CI: 0.574-0.905). Higher risks of active PTB were observed among contacts with household exposure (OR=1.274, 95%CI: 1.012-1.604), suspicious TB symptoms (OR=12.979, 95%CI: 9.361-17.996), and contacts of patients with positive etiological test results (OR=1.385, 95%CI: 1.071-1.791). For LTBI risk, elevated odds were found in contacts aged ≥21 years (21-<41 years, OR=1.627, 95%CI: 1.471-1.800; 41-<61 years, OR=2.113, 95%CI: 1.933-2.310; ≥61 years, OR=1.731, 95%CI: 1.573-1.905), those with household exposure (OR=1.092, 95%CI: 1.012-1.178), individuals presenting suspicious TB symptoms (OR=4.170, 95%CI: 3.326-5.229), and contacts of etiologically positive PTB patients (OR=1.403, 95%CI: 1.283-1.534). Conclusion Active PTB and LTBI among close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Sichuan Province were associated with factors including age, type of exposure, presence of presumptive tuberculosis symptoms, and etiological results of the index patients.
Key wordspulmonary tuberculosis    close contacts    active pulmonary tuberculosis    latent tuberculosis infection    screening
收稿日期: 2026-03-25      修回日期: 2026-07-07      出版日期: 2026-07-10
中图分类号:  R521  
作者简介: 熊燕,硕士,主管医师,主要从事结核病防治综合质量控制工作
通信作者: 李婷,E-mail:625037231@qq.com   
引用本文:   
熊燕, 夏岚, 李运葵, 钟引, 王丹霞, 李婷. 四川省肺结核患者密切接触者筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 666-670.
XIONG Yan, XIA Lan, LI Yunkui, ZHONG Yin, WANG Danxia, LI Ting. Screening results for close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Sichuan Province. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(7): 666-670.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.07.005      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I7/666
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2025[R].Geneva:WHO,2025.
[2] Zhou M L,Wang L Q,Li M,et al.Contact investigation of tuberculosis in Shanghai,China:a 13-year cohort[J/OL].Tuberculosis(Edinb),2023,139[2026-07-07].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2023.102323.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家疾病预防控制局,中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会,等.全国结核病防治规划(2024—2030年)[EB/OL].[2026-07-07].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202412/content_6991217.htm.
[4] 宋媛媛,李涛,夏辉,等.1997—2023年全国肺结核报告发病流行病学特征[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(10):1198-1208.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅,中华人民共和国教育部办公厅.中国学校结核病防控指南(2020年版)[EB/OL].[2026-07-07].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/05/content_5567137.htm.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅.中国结核病预防控制工作技术规范(2020年版)[EB/OL].[2026-07-07].https://www.bjcdc.org/cdcmodule/rdxw/jhbfz/images/jswj/2023/08/24/1692856566940077548.pdf.
[7] 徐彩红,赵雁林.中国结核病预防性治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2023.
[8] WS 288—2017 肺结核诊断[S].
[9] Velen K,Shingde R V,Ho J,et al.The effectiveness of contact investigation among contacts of tuberculosis patients:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL].Eur Respir J,2021,58(6)[2026-07-07].https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00266-2021.
[10] 夏岚,刘双,李婷,等.2018—2022年四川省病原学阳性肺结核患者密切接触者筛查情况分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(2):178-182.
[11] 李玉红,李雪,王嘉,等.2016—2023年全国病原学阳性肺结核患者密切接触者筛查情况分析[J].中国预防医学杂志,2025,26(9):1052-1057.
[12] 张静,付若楠,王森路,等.高负担地区肺结核密切接触者中结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染者预防性治疗接受意愿及影响因素研究[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(2):165-172.
[13] 胥江俊,胡屹,蒋伟利,等.上海市流动人口肺结核患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染情况及危险因素[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2016,39(1):25-29.
[14] 李红永,冯冬梅,倪阵.活动性肺结核患者家庭内密切接触者结核感染情况调查[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2024,47(5):509-512.
[15] Fahdhienie F,Mudatsir M,Abidin T F,et al.Risk factors of pulmonary tuberculosis in Indonesia:a case-control study in a high disease prevalence region[J/OL].Narra J,2024,4(2)[2026-07-07].https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i2.943.
[16] 范明宽,张慧.《中国社区肺结核主动筛查循证指南》解读[J].结核与肺部疾病杂志,2023,4(1):1-4
[1] 江学奇, 陈同, 林相, 车洋, 林律, 桑国鑫, 王奕楠, 张栋梁. 宁波市肺结核患者确诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 699-702.
[2] 唐慧玲, 陈依娜, 朱凯强, 李卫丹, 张子根, 陈高尚. 2016—2025年金华市流动人口肺结核流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 541-544.
[3] 何继东, 黄勇, 张宇, 李婷, 张辉望, 姚寒砺, 栾荣生. 2011—2024年眉山市肺结核流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 555-558.
[4] 吴青燕, 毛景, 吴坤阳, 郑旭航, 吴海龙, 赵丽娜. 乐清市一起肺结核聚集性疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 559-563,567.
[5] 江燕, 王荣, 温佳鑫. 基于决策树-马尔可夫模型的南京市老年糖尿病患者肺结核筛查成本效用分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 545-549.
[6] 赵丽娜, 曾真, 林韩特, 毛景, 朱婷婷, 单志力, 毛玲琼, 李君. 温州市HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 550-554.
[7] 殷畅, 叶佳佳, 杨永梅. 丽水市新生儿先天性心脏病免费筛查的经济学评价[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 583-587.
[8] 刘慧敏, 钱永刚, 陈文婕, 葛丽岩. 内蒙古自治区农村上消化道癌机会性筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 639-642.
[9] 杨利, 滕楠, 张若娣, 陈腾伟, 许圆圆. 台州市中小学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 564-567.
[10] 卢美, 余霞, 汪德兵, 陶智勇, 王炜, 宋怡晴. 2016—2025年开化县肺结核患者就诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 460-463.
[11] 陈国智, 赵丽娜. 结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测技术与诊断的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 447-451.
[12] 肖筱, 陈彬, 刘巧, 沈鑫. 我国结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查与预防性治疗进展[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 433-437.
[13] 张业晴, 于全骥, 刘巧. 江苏省结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染防治策略、实践与挑战[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 438-441.
[14] 祖之鹏, 陈瑞麒, 陈海婷, 王晓萌. 耐药结核病患者密切接触者左氧氟沙星预防性治疗研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 442-446.
[15] 朱珂, 陈高尚, 唐慧玲, 龙智平, 金屡华, 吴佳晖. 金华市HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 452-455.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed