Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (4): 352-356    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.04.007
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
老年人认知功能变化轨迹的影响因素分析
张曦小雪1, 王雪纯1, 刘良楹1, 武文君1, 马玉1, 何耀2, 刘淼1
1.中国人民解放军总医院研究生院,北京 100853;
2.中国人民解放军总医院第二医学中心老年医学研究所,北京 100853
Influencing factors for cognitive function trajectories among the elderly
ZHANG Xixiaoxue1, WANG Xuechun1, LIU Liangying1, WU Wenjun1, MA Yu1, HE Yao2, LIU Miao1
1. Graduate school of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China;
2. Institute of Geriatrics, Second Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
全文: PDF(797 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析老年人认知功能变化轨迹及其影响因素,为老年人认知功能损伤预防干预提供依据。方法 基于中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查(CLHLS)2011年、2014年和2018年调查资料,收集≥65岁老年人的人口学信息和生活行为等资料;采用简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)评估认知功能;基于2011年、2014年和2018年MMSE评分,建立组轨迹模型,识别认知功能变化轨迹;根据贝叶斯信息准则、赤池信息准则和平均后验概率等指标确定最优轨迹模型。采用无序多分类logistic回归模型分析认知功能变化轨迹的影响因素。结果 收集2 614人资料,年龄为(78.20±8.93)岁。男性1 251人,占47.86%;女性1 363人,占52.14%。组轨迹模型分析识别3组认知功能变化轨迹,根据认知功能变化特征定义为稳定组、缓慢下降组和快速下降组,分别为2 187、170和257人,占83.66%、6.50%和9.83%。无序多分类logistic回归分析结果显示,相较于稳定组,年龄每增加1岁,老年人归属于缓慢下降组或快速下降组的风险分别增加315.7%(OR=4.157 ,95%CI: 2.922~5.914)和214.6%(OR=3.146 ,95%CI: 2.428~4.076);与未受过教育的老年人相比,小学/初中文化程度的老年人归属于缓慢下降组或快速下降组的风险分别降低67.5%(OR=0.325 ,95%CI: 0.207~0.511)和30.2%(OR=0.698 ,95%CI: 0.505~0.964);与未婚/离异/丧偶的老年人相比,已婚老年人归属于快速下降组的风险降低31.0%(OR=0.690 ,95%CI: 0.509~0.935)。结论 基于CLHLS项目,≥65岁老年人表现为稳定、缓慢下降和快速下降3种认知功能变化轨迹,年龄增长可增加认知功能下降风险,较高的文化程度和已婚可降低认知功能下降风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张曦小雪
王雪纯
刘良楹
武文君
马玉
何耀
刘淼
关键词 老年人认知功能组轨迹模型简易精神状态检查量表中国老年健康影响因素跟踪调查    
AbstractObjective To analyze the trajectories of cognitive function changes and their influencing factors among the elderly, so as to provide evidence for the prevention and intervention of cognitive impairment in this population. Methods Data were obtained from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which was conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2018. Information on demographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviors of elderly individuals aged ≥65 years was collected. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Group-based trajectory modeling was conducted using MMSE scores from 2011, 2014, and 2018 to identify trajectories of cognitive function change. The optimal trajectory model was determined using the Bayesian information criterion, Akaike information criterion, and average posterior probability. Factors affecting cognitive function trajectories among the elderly were analyzed using a Multinomial logistic regression model. Results Data were collected from 2 614 individuals, with the mean age of (78.20±8.93) years. There were 1 251 males (47.86%) and 1 363 females (52.14%). The group-based trajectory model identified three distinct cognitive function trajectories, defined as the stable group, slow decline group, and rapid decline group, consisting of 2 187 (83.66%), 170 (6.50%), and 257 (9.83%) individuals, respectively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that compared with the stable group, each 1-year increase in age was associated with a 315.7% higher risk of being classified into the slowly declining group (OR=4.157, 95%CI: 2.922-5.914) and a 214.6% higher risk of being classified into the rapidly declining group (OR=3.146, 95%CI: 2.428-4.076). Compared with elderly individuals with no formal education, those with primary/junior high school education had a 67.5% lower risk of being classified into the slowly declining group (OR=0.325, 95%CI: 0.207-0.511) and a 30.2% lower risk of being classified into the rapidly declining group (OR=0.698, 95%CI: 0.505-0.964). Compared with unmarried/divorced/widowed elderly individuals, those who were married had a 31.0% lower risk of being classified into the rapid decline group (OR=0.690, 95%CI: 0.509-0.935). Conclusions Based on the CLHLS data, cognitive function trajectories among individuals aged ≥65 years were classified into three patterns: stable, slow decline, and rapid decline. Increased age was associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline, while higher educational level and being married demonstrated protective effects against cognitive deterioration.
Key wordsthe elderly    cognitive function    group-based trajectory model    Mini-Mental State Examination    Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey
收稿日期: 2025-08-27      修回日期: 2026-04-03      出版日期: 2026-04-10
中图分类号:  R195  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(82574176,82173589,82173590); 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC2503605); 国家科技重大专项(2023ZD0500901); 首都卫生发展专项(2024-2G-5033,2022-2G-5031); 北京市自然科学基金项目(7252181)
作者简介: 张曦小雪,博士研究生在读,老年医学专业
通信作者: 刘淼,E-mail:liumiaolmbxb@163.com   
引用本文:   
张曦小雪, 王雪纯, 刘良楹, 武文君, 马玉, 何耀, 刘淼. 老年人认知功能变化轨迹的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 352-356.
ZHANG Xixiaoxue, WANG Xuechun, LIU Liangying, WU Wenjun, MA Yu, HE Yao, LIU Miao. Influencing factors for cognitive function trajectories among the elderly. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(4): 352-356.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.04.007      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I4/352
[1] 中华人民共和国民政部,全国老龄办.2023年度国家老龄事业发展公报[R].北京,2024.
[2] 中国人口与发展研究中心.中国人口中长期变动趋势预测报告[R].北京,2022.
[3] MA T P,LIAO J Q,YE Y G,et al.Social support and cognitive activity and their associations with incident cognitive impairment in cognitively normal older adults[J/OL].BMC Geriatr,2024,24(1)[2026-04-03].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04655-5.
[4] JIA L F,QUAN M N,FU Y,et al.Dementia in China:epidemiology,clinical management,and research advances[J].Lancet Neurol,2020,19(1):81-92.
[5] LI L W,DING D,WU B,et al.Change of cognitive function in U.S. Chinese older adults:a population-based study[J].J Gerontol Ser A,2017,72(Suppl. 1):5-10.
[6] MIN J W.A longitudinal study of cognitive trajectories and its factors for Koreans aged 60 and over:a latent growth mixture model[J].Int J Geriatr Psychiatry,2018,33(5):755-762.
[7] NAGIN D S.Group-based trajectory modeling:an overview[J].Ann Nutr Metab,2014,65(2/3):205-210.
[8] 董春玲,王冲,关添元,等.基于组轨迹模型的老年人膳食多样性与认知功能研究[J].预防医学,2025,37(9):865-869.
[9] FOLSTEIN M F,FOLSTEIN S E,MCHUGH P R.“Mini-mental state”.A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J].J Psychiatr Res,1975,12(3):189-198.
[10] ZHU A N,CHEN H,SHEN J,et al.Interaction between plant based dietary pattern and air pollution on cognitive function:a prospective cohort analysis of Chinese older adults[J/OL].Lancet Reg Health West Pac,2022,20[2026-04-03].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100372.
[11] 彭星,李逸晗,陈振霆,等.基于组轨迹模型的中老年人群衰弱与认知功能关联研究[J].预防医学,2025,37(5):449-454.
[12] ZHAO Y,ZHOU W,XING M,et al.Later-life cognitive trajectories and risk of death:results from a 6-year longitudinal study of 7 082 Chinese[J].J Prev Alzheimers Dis,2024,11(5):1410-1417.
[13] ABAEI E,MARTIN P.Cognitive function and its change over time:effects on depression trajectories in oldest-old adults[J/OL].Aging Ment Health,2026[2026-04-03].https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2026.2612728.
[14] 马丽娜,李莹.慢性炎症对老年人生理衰弱和认知功能障碍的影响研究进展[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2020,34(10):1078-1080.
[15] 王影,陈艺舟,高明龙,等.衰弱与老年人认知功能障碍相关发病机制的研究进展[J].武警医学,2021,32(4):349-353.
[16] OLAYA B,BOBAK M,HARO J M,et al.Trajectories of verbal episodic memory in middle-aged and older adults:evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2017,65(6):1274-1281.
[17] TU L H,LV X Z,YUAN C Z,et al.Trajectories of cognitive function and their determinants in older people:12 years of follow-up in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey[J].Int Psychogeriatr,2020,32(6):765-775.
[18] 李皓炜,齐士格,王盛书,等.中国社区老年人脑认知相关生活方式对早期认知功能下降的影响[J].中华流行病学杂志,2024,45(1):63-70.
[19] 胡依,闵淑慧,郭芮绮,等.基于组基轨迹建模的中国老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹研究[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(4):695-699.
[1] 张文, 吴成果, 郑登虎, 罗建奎, 罗杰, 孙建, 张理翌, 雷蓉蓉, 廖文平. 南川区老年人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 338-342.
[2] 朱颖, 凌羽晓, 祝惠红. 2014—2023年嘉善县老年肺结核患者就诊延迟和确诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 343-347.
[3] 史耀熊, 徐洁, 王筱颖, 胡涛, 方珍. 老年糖尿病患者综合护理联合康复干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 410-414.
[4] 赵锦航, 李殿江, 陈伟, 王志勇, 潘志, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能在社会支持与抑郁症状间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 357-361.
[5] 黄文, 许璐璐, 黄敏钢, 王柯颖, 陈康康, 陈奇峰. 老年人肌少症的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 362-366.
[6] 蒋扬莹, 楼赟, 王方鲁, 陈松华. 2014—2024年诸暨市老年人群肺结核流行特征和时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 222-225,230.
[7] 陈绍云, 于传宁, 邹健锋, 霍泳琦, 谷超男, 陈健东, 严新凤, 曹思静. 老年人跌倒致中重度伤害的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 302-306.
[8] 马宗康, 刘星郎, 李惠惠, 何国威, 颜萍, 张传荣, 马萱, 车雅洁, 于珊, 陈凤辉. 老年人轻度认知功能障碍风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 124-129.
[9] 万阳, 张世伟, 胡建功, 肖春丽, 赵红叶, 吴殚, 甘冰洋, 陈梦鑫, 张瑞祎, 王凤双, 彭涛. 顺义区老年人健康素养水平及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 201-205.
[10] 李燕冰, 周树彤, 李莹莹, 毕善琳, 李友卫. 农村中老年慢性病患者自我效能感在家庭健康与健康素养间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 75-78,84.
[11] 董春玲, 王冲, 关添元, 刘玥, 李雪莹, 张玉海. 基于组轨迹模型的老年人膳食多样性与认知功能研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 865-869.
[12] 杜昌翰, 高琳茜, 卢心雨, 赵渭娟, 李领. 1992—2021年我国老年人群口腔癌疾病负担的年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 870-874.
[13] 章涛, 林君芬, 古雪, 徐乐, 李傅冬, 吴晨. 社区老年人阿尔茨海默病列线图预测模型构建[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 875-880.
[14] 陶桃, 张海芳, 凡鹏飞, 李秋华, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市老年肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 892-896,902.
[15] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed