Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (10): 1012-1016    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.008
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
2型糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病风险预测模型研究
杜雨欣1, 余欢1, 李雅倩1, 唐美丽2, 刘宜苑2, 余艳梅2, 刘雪彦2
1.暨南大学护理学院,广东 广州 510632;
2.暨南大学附属第一医院,广东 广州 510630
Prediction model for the risk of peripheral arterial disease among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
DU Yuxin1, YU Huan1, LI Yaqian1, TANG Meili2, LIU Yiyuan2, YU Yanmei2, LIU Xueyan2
1. School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, China;
2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China
全文: PDF(879 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者外周动脉疾病(PAD)风险预测模型,为PAD风险评估与早期筛查提供依据。方法 选择2018年12月—2020年12月在暨南大学附属第一医院住院治疗的T2DM患者为研究对象,通过电子病历系统收集患者性别、年龄等基本信息,空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白等实验室指标,以及足部胼胝、足部异常感觉和电流感觉阈值(CPT)等足部筛查指标。研究对象按7∶3比例随机分为训练集和验证集。采用LASSO回归和多因素logistic回归模型筛选预测因子,构建列线图预测模型。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和决策曲线分析评估模型的预测性能。结果 纳入T2DM患者972例,其中男性535例,占55.04%;女性437例,占44.96%。年龄M(QR)为59.00(18.00)岁。检出PAD 84例,检出率为8.64%。训练集681例,PAD 59例;验证集291例,PAD 25例。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.053,95%CI:1.027~1.080)、足部异常感觉(疼痛,OR=4.517,95%CI:1.610~12.667)和CPT(OR=1.094,95%CI:1.022~1.171)是T2DM患者PAD的预测因子。构建的列线图预测模型在训练集中AUC值、灵敏度和特异度分别为0.771、0.780和0.701,当风险阈值概率为1%~26%时,临床净获益较高;在验证集中AUC值、灵敏度和特异度分别为0.752、0.800和0.628;当风险阈值概率为1%~43%时,临床净获益较高。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验结果显示,模型在训练集和验证集中校准度良好(均P>0.05)。结论 采用年龄、足部异常感觉和CPT 3个预测因子构建的列线图预测模型有较好的区分度、校准度和临床净获益,可用于预测T2DM患者PAD风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杜雨欣
余欢
李雅倩
唐美丽
刘宜苑
余艳梅
刘雪彦
关键词 : 2型糖尿病,  外周动脉疾病,  预测模型,  列线图    
Abstract:Objective To establish a prediction model for the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), so as to provide a basis for risk assessment and early screening of PAD. Methods Patients with T2DM hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from December 2018 to December 2020 were selected as study subjects. Basic information, including gender and age, laboratory indicators, including fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin, and foot screening indicators, including foot calluses, abnormal foot sensations and current perception threshold (CPT), were collected through the electronic medical record system. The study subjects were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7∶3. Predictors were screened using LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression, and a nomogram prediction model was established. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis. Results A total of 972 patients with T2DM were collected, including 535 (55.04%) males and 437 (44.96%) females. The median age was 59.00 (interquartile range, 18.00) years. PAD was detected in 84 patients, with a detection rate of 8.64%. The training set included 681 patients, with 59 PAD cases, while the validation set included 291 patients, with 25 PAD cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR=1.053, 95%CI: 1.027-1.080), abnormal foot sensation (pain, OR=4.517, 95%CI: 1.610-12.667) and CPT (OR=1.094, 95%CI: 1.022-1.171) were predictors of PAD among patients with T2DM. In the training set, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.771, 0.780 and 0.701, with a higher net clinical benefit at risk threshold probabilities of 1%-26%. In the validation set, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.752, 0.800 and 0.628, respectively, with a higher net clinical benefit at risk threshold probabilities of 1%-43%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good model calibration in both the training and validation sets (both P>0.05). Conclusion The nomogram prediction model constructed using three predictors, including age, abnormal foot sensation and CPT, showed good discrimination, calibration and net clinical benefit, and can be used to predict the risk of PAD in patients with T2DM.
Key words: type 2 diabetes mellitus    peripheral arterial disease    prediction model    nomogram
收稿日期: 2026-05-26      修回日期: 2026-09-12      出版日期: 2026-10-10
中图分类号:  R587.1  
基金资助:广东省数字孪生人重点实验室(华南理工大学)基金项目(2022B1212010004); 2025年疏附县科技局计划项目(SF2025006)
作者简介: 杜雨欣,硕士研究生在读,护理专业
通信作者: 刘雪彦,E-mail:10181541@qq.com   
引用本文:   
杜雨欣, 余欢, 李雅倩, 唐美丽, 刘宜苑, 余艳梅, 刘雪彦. 2型糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(10): 1012-1016.
DU Yuxin, YU Huan, LI Yaqian, TANG Meili, LIU Yiyuan, YU Yanmei, LIU Xueyan. Prediction model for the risk of peripheral arterial disease among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(10): 1012-1016.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.008      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I10/1012
[1] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国糖尿病足防治指南(2019版)[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2019,11(3):161-168.
[2] Amamoo J,Xie L,Steffens A,et al.Impact of peripheral artery disease(PAD)on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)in patients with type 2 diabetes[J/OL].Am J Prev Cardiol,2026,25[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101397.
[3] Zhang X M,Ran X W,Xu Z R,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of lower extremity arterial disease in Chinese diabetes patients at high risk:a prospective,multicenter,cross-sectional study[J].J Diabetes Complicat,2018,32(2):150-156.
[4] Fitridge R,Chuter V,Mills J,et al.The intersocietal IWGDF,ESVS,SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer[J/OL].Diabetes Metab Res Rev,2024,40(3)[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3686.
[5] 苏银霞,卢耀勤,田翔华,等.基于常规体检指标的2型糖尿病风险预测研究进展[J].预防医学,2022,34(12):1230-1234.
[6] Yu H C,Zhang J J,Qian F,et al.Large-scale plasma proteomics improves prediction of peripheral artery disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes:a prospective cohort study[J].Diabetes Care,2025,48(3):381-389.
[7] World Health Organization.Definition,diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications:report of a WHO consultation.part 1:diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus[R].Geneva:WHO,1999.
[8] 胡大一,杨进刚.下肢动脉疾病诊断和治疗专家共识[J].中国实用内科杂志,2006,26(22):1678-1683.
[9] Writing Committee Members.2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease:executive summary[J].Vasc Med,2017,22(3):1-43.
[10] Pang X H,Han J,Ye W L,et al.Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease and stroke risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China[J/OL].Int J Endocrinol,2017[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9620513.
[11] Head T,Daunert S,Goldschmidt-Clermont P J.The aging risk and atherosclerosis:a fresh look at arterial homeostasis[J/OL].Front Genet,2017,8[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00216.
[12] American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee.12.retinopathy,neuropathy,and foot care:standards of care in diabetes-2024[J].Diabetes Care,2024,47(Suppl. 1):231-243.
[13] Yin H X,Liu M S,Zhu Y C,et al.Reference values and influencing factors analysis for current perception threshold testing based on study of 166 healthy Chinese[J/OL].Front Neurosci,2018,12[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00014.
[14] Chen T,Xiao S J,Chen Z D,et al.Risk factors for peripheral artery disease and diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients with type 2 diabetes[J/OL].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2024,207[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111079.
[15] Yang Y,Zhao B,Wang Y Z,et al.Diabetic neuropathy:cutting-edge research and future directions[J/OL].Sig Transduct Target Ther,2025,10[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-025-02175-1.
[16] Zhu J X,Hu Z Y,Luo Y F,et al.Diabetic peripheral neuropathy:pathogenetic mechanisms and treatment[J/OL].Front Endocrinol,2023,14[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1265372.
[17] Halawa M R,Abushady M M,Abdelsalam M M,et al.Study of urinary calprotectin levels in type 2 diabetics with peripheral arterial disease[J/OL].QJM,2020,113(Suppl. 1)[2026-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa052.041.
[1] 唐记, 章思思, 苏晚英. 中老年2型糖尿病患者体力活动量的链式中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(9): 912-916,922.
[2] 李彤, 韩树奎, 任义涛, 符璐璐, 樊鹏程, 陈虹汝. 青海省超重肥胖成年人抑郁症状预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(9): 895-899.
[3] 王小红, 徐则林, 王诚, 江凤. 2型糖尿病发病年龄与心脑血管疾病的回顾性队列研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(8): 757-760.
[4] 赵锦航, 李殿江, 陈伟, 王志勇, 潘志, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能在社会支持与抑郁症状间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 357-361.
[5] 王超, 张路平, 陈梦宇, 花霞, 王静. 阴道分娩初产妇盆腔器官脱垂的预测模型构建[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 423-428.
[6] 李丹, 揭金花, 李宏, 林麒, 庄海林. 老年2型糖尿病患者应对方式、日常生活活动能力在社会支持与抑郁症状间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 279-283,290.
[7] 马宗康, 刘星郎, 李惠惠, 何国威, 颜萍, 张传荣, 马萱, 车雅洁, 于珊, 陈凤辉. 老年人轻度认知功能障碍风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 124-129.
[8] 吴成慧, 彭艳红, 张可, 朱维晔, 邓亮, 谭玲玲, 瞿丹丹, 米秋香. 中青年2型糖尿病患者益处发现的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 31-35.
[9] 章涛, 林君芬, 古雪, 徐乐, 李傅冬, 吴晨. 社区老年人阿尔茨海默病列线图预测模型构建[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 875-880.
[10] 陆杰, 张柯, 吴雅, 王玥, 张玥, 陆叶, 吴周理, 任志华, 黄艺文. 肥胖指标预测2型糖尿病患者心脑血管疾病的效果比较[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 886-891.
[11] 张凯慧, 李婉玲, 王彦兴, 安愿. 老年2型糖尿病患者心理灵活性、运动自我效能在衰弱与社会疏离间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 783-788.
[12] 楚楚, 徐红, 蔡波, 韩颖颖, 穆海祥, 郑会燕, 林玲. 中老年人群脑卒中风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 649-653.
[13] 刘明坤, 张丰香, 韩彩静, 王霞, 陈世坤, 金梅, 孙金月. 2型糖尿病患者周围神经病变风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 692-696.
[14] 龚亮亮, 戎志东. 10~13岁儿童非自杀性自伤行为风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 546-550.
[15] 俞丹丹, 杨加丽, 张雅萍, 许慧琳, 何丹丹, 李俊. 2型糖尿病共病患者空腹血糖波动轨迹的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 562-567,572.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed