Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (3): 243-247    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.03.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
肺结核密切接触学生结核菌素皮肤试验结果分析
孙佳美, 卢巧玲, 高华强, 杨作凯, 徐来潮
绍兴市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 绍兴 312075
Tuberculin skin test results among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis
SUN Jiamei, LU Qiaoling, GAO Huaqiang, YANG Zuokai, XU Laichao
Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312075, China
全文: PDF(835 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解肺结核密切接触学生结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)结果及TST阳性的影响因素,为学生肺结核防控提供依据。方法 选择2016年10月—2023年12月浙江省绍兴市越城区≥15岁的肺结核密切接触学生为研究对象,通过问卷调查和TST收集人口学信息、接触史和TST结果等资料;采用多因素logistic回归模型分析肺结核密切接触学生TST阳性的影响因素。结果 调查肺结核密切接触学生5 507人,其中男生2 982人,女生2 525人,男女比为1.18∶1。年龄为(19.10±1.71)岁。中专学生397人,占7.21%;高中学生766人,占13.91%;大专学生2 556人,占46.41%;大学及以上学生1 788人,占32.47%。TST阳性958例,阳性率为17.40%;一般阳性率、中度阳性率和强阳性率分别为10.53%、4.98%和1.89%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,高中(OR=1.473,95%CI:1.009~2.152)或大专(OR=1.467,95%CI:1.074~2.005)、暴露至筛查间隔≥46 d(46~<61 d,OR=2.043,95%CI:1.478~2.826;≥61 d,OR=1.291,95%CI:1.018~1.637)的肺结核密切接触学生TST阳性风险较高;肺结核密切接触女生(OR=0.753,95%CI:0.649~0.873)TST阳性风险较低。结论 肺结核密切接触学生TST阳性率较高,性别、学校类型、暴露至筛查间隔是肺结核密切接触学生TST阳性的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙佳美
卢巧玲
高华强
杨作凯
徐来潮
关键词 肺结核密切接触者学生结核菌素皮肤试验影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the status of tuberculin skin test (TST) results and the influencing factors among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis, so as to provide the evidence for developing prevention and control strategies for pulmonary tuberculosis among students. Methods The students aged 15 years and above who had close contact with pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Yuecheng District, Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, from October 2016 to December 2023 were recruited and investigated using questionnaires and TST to collect demographic information, contact history, and TST results. The influencing factors for TST positivity among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 5 507 student close contacts were investigated, including 2 982 males and 2 525 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.18∶1. The mean age was (19.10±1.71) years. Among them, 397 (7.21%) were technical secondary school students, 766 (13.91%) were senior high school students, 2 556 (46.41%) were junior college students, and 1 788 (32.47%) were college students or above. A total of 958 students tested positive for TST, with a positivity rate of 17.40%. The rates of general positivity, moderate positivity, and strong positivity were 10.53%, 4.98% and 1.89%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that senior high school students (OR=1.473, 95%CI: 1.009-2.152) and junior college students (OR=1.467, 95%CI: 1.074-2.005), as well as those with an exposure-to-screening interval of ≥46 days (46-<61 days, OR=2.043, 95%CI: 1.478-2.826; ≥61 days, OR=1.291, 95%CI: 1.018-1.637) had a higher risk of TST positivity. Female student close contacts had a lower risk of TST positivity (OR=0.753, 95%CI: 0.649-0.873). Conclusion The TST positivity rate was relatively high, and gender, school type, and exposure-to-screening interval were influencing factors for TST positivity among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis.
Key wordspulmonary tuberculosis    close contact    student    tuberculin skin test    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2024-12-11      修回日期: 2025-02-11      出版日期: 2025-03-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:浙江省疾病预防控制科技计划项目(2025JK298);全省传染病疫苗与预防控制研究重点实验室开放基金资助(2024KF06)
作者简介: 孙佳美,硕士,主管医师,主要从事结核病防控工作
通信作者: 徐来潮,E-mail:xlc312000@163.com   
引用本文:   
孙佳美, 卢巧玲, 高华强, 杨作凯, 徐来潮. 肺结核密切接触学生结核菌素皮肤试验结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 243-247.
SUN Jiamei, LU Qiaoling, GAO Huaqiang, YANG Zuokai, XU Laichao. Tuberculin skin test results among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(3): 243-247.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.03.006      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I3/243
[1] 雷蓉蓉,隆红霞,罗翠红,等.重庆市病原学阳性肺结核患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染现状及影响因素[J].中国感染控制杂志,2024,23(3):265-270.
LEI R R,LONG H X,LUO C H,et al.Latent tuberculosis infection among close contacts of positive etiology pulmonary tuberculosis in Chongqing[J].Chin J Infect Control,2024,23(3):265-270.(in Chinese)
[2] 刘明,黄志琴,方芳,等.安徽某高校2012—2022年肺结核报告发病情况分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2023,29(4):328-331.
LIU M,HUANG Z Q,FANG F,et al.Analysis of the reported incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in a university in Anhui Province from 2012 to 2022[J].Anhui J Prev Med,2023,29(4):328-331.(in Chinese)
[3] 龚德华,唐益,谭文倩,等.2011—2020年湖南省学生结核病时空特征分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(5):478-483.
GONG D H,TANG Y,TAN W Q,et al.Spatial-temporal analysis of tuberculosis among students in Hu'nan Province, during 2011-2020[J].Chin J Antituberc,2022,44(5):478-483.(in Chinese)
[4] 周建伟,张松桃,李占辉,等.学校肺结核疫情密切接触者基线筛查及随访队列研究[J].结核与肺部疾病杂志,2023,4(2):120-127.
ZHOU J W,ZHANG S T,LI Z H,et al.Baseline screening and follow-up cohort study of close contacts of school tuberculosis epidemic[J].J Tuberc Lung Dis,2023,4(2):120-127.(in Chinese)
[5] 林相,贺天锋,龚德光,等.宁波市学校肺结核聚集性疫情影响因素分析[J].中国预防医学杂志,2023,24(12):1376-1379.
LIN X,HE T F,GONG D G,et al.Influencing factors for the cluster outbreak of pulmonary tuberculosis in schools in Ningbo City[J].Chin Prev Med,2023,24(12):1376-1379.(in Chinese)
[6] 张晓龙,崔彩岩,傅颖,等.学校肺结核密切接触者感染暴露对疫情风险预测的影响[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2025,29(1):108-110,116.
ZHANG X L,CUI C Y,FU Y,et al.The impact of infection exposure among close contacts of tuberculosis cases in school on epidemic risk prediction[J].Chin J Dis Control Prev,2025,29(1):108-110,116.(in Chinese)
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.关于印发中国学校结核病防控指南(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2025-02-11].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7923/202012/5f40b53827ae41c5ab7827
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断标准:WS 288—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.Diagnostic criteria for tuberculosis:WS 288—2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2017.(in Chinese)
[9] 李芬,许英顺,曹申梅,等.山东省某高校2018—2022年肺结核病发病情况及密切接触者筛查结果分析[J].中国校医,2024,38(9):680-684.
LI F,XU Y S,CAO S M,et al.Incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis and screening results among patients' close contacts at a university in Shandong Province from 2018 to 2022[J].Chin J School Doctor,2024,38(9):680-684.(in Chinese)
[10] 李小媛,杨绍湖,黄鸿玉,等.南宁市高校结核病密切接触者不同剂型结核菌素试验结果比较[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(5):768-771,775.
LI X Y,YANG S H,HUANG H Y,et al.Comparison of tuberculin test results of different dosage forms among close contacts of tuberculosis in colleges and universities in Nanning[J].Chin J Sch Health,2021,42(5):768-771,775.(in Chinese)
[11] 刘文,高术,华邵帅.青岛市某高校肺结核病密切接触者筛查结果分析[J].中国校医,2024,38(7):515-517.
LIU W,GAO S,HUA S S.Screening results of close contacts of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis at a university in Qingdao[J].Chin J School Doctor,2024,38(7):515-517.(in Chinese)
[12] 卢巧玲,方益荣,高华强,等.绍兴市学校肺结核流行特征[J].预防医学,2018,30(5):516-518.
LU Q L,FANG Y R,GAO H Q,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in schools in Shaoxing City[J].China Prev Med J,2018,30(5):516-518.(in Chinese)
[13] 赵鑫,张亚楠,闫银锁,等.2020—2022年北京市大学和高中学段新生结核菌素皮肤试验反应特征分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(1):40-44.
ZHAO X,ZHANG Y N,YAN Y S,et al.Analysis of the characteristics of tuberculin skin test reactions among college and high school freshmen in Beijing from 2020 to 2022[J].Chin J Antituberc,2024,46(1):40-44.(in Chinese)
[14] 赵小双,谭健霞,刘靖元,等.深圳市龙岗区寄宿制中学新生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染现状[J].中国学校卫生,2024,45(3):419-422.
ZHAO X S,TAN J X,LIU J Y,et al.Status of Mycobacterium tuberculosis latent infection among freshmen in boarding middle schools in Longgang district,Shenzhen[J].Chin J Sch Health,2024,45(3):419-422.(in Chinese)
[15] ANIBARRO L,TRIGO M,VILLAVERDE C,et al.Interferon-γ release assays in tuberculosis contacts:is there a window period?[J].Eur Respir J,2011,37(1):215-217.
[16] 陈高尚,朱凯强,朱军礼,等.金华市学生结核病病例发现延迟的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2024,36(8):698-701.
CHEN G S,ZHU K Q,ZHU J L,et al.Influencing factors for delay in identification of tuberculosis among students in Jinhua City[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(8):698-701.(in Chinese)
[17] EWE R K,MILLINGTON K A,DECKS J J,et al.Dynamic antigen-specific T-cell responses after point-source exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2006,174(7):831-839.
[18] 沈洪波,陈维政.结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的免疫机制及免疫干预研究进展[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2016,39(1):47-51.
SHEN H B,CHEN W Z.Immunologic mechanism and immune intervention therapy of latent tuberculosis infection[J].Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis,2016,39(1):47-51.(in Chinese)
[19] 邱曼玲,江毅,李梦映,等.在校学生结核潜伏感染及预防性治疗研究进展[J].预防医学,2024,36(1):30-33.
QIU M L,JIANG Y,LI M Y,et al.Latent tuberculosis infection and preventive treatment among in-school students:a review[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(1):30-33.(in Chinese)
[1] 吕婧, 徐欣颖, 乔颖异, 石兴龙, 岳芳, 刘营, 程传龙, 张宇琦, 孙继民, 李秀君. 浙江省发热伴血小板减少综合征流行特征及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 10-14.
[2] 吴成慧, 彭艳红, 张可, 朱维晔, 邓亮, 谭玲玲, 瞿丹丹, 米秋香. 中青年2型糖尿病患者益处发现的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 31-35.
[3] 徐光明, 张震, 叶小红. 2015—2024年临海市新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 71-74.
[4] 王芸, 申赟魁, 刘博昊, 陈静, 张琨. 延庆区中小学生近视与超重肥胖共患现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 85-88.
[5] 夏子淇, 陈晴晴, 高四海, 吴矛矛. 温州市中小学生营养健康知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 98-101,106.
[6] 陈慧, 苗姗姗, 刘宪峰, 张慧. 新疆生产建设兵团中小学生龋齿现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 102-106.
[7] 陶桃, 张海芳, 凡鹏飞, 李秋华, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市老年肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 892-896,902.
[8] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
[9] 姜艳, 李锦成, 许纯, 杨科佼, 杨文彬, 徐胜. 扬州市MSM人群艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓率调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 903-906,912.
[10] 凌红, 汪娜, 宋琴, 徐昊. 2009—2023年黄浦区肺结核流行特征和时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 937-940.
[11] 张一, 李梦迪, 石亚锋, 苗超. 余姚市中小学生超重和肥胖现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 955-958.
[12] 翟羽佳, 章涛, 古雪, 徐乐, 吴梦娜, 林君芬, 吴晨. 社区老年人认知衰弱现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 762-766,772.
[13] 苏德华, 陈向阳, 李君, 赵丽娜, 张鹤美, 朱婷婷, 胡文雪, 赖江宜. 温州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗及时性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 804-808.
[14] 严青秀, 王炜, 郝晓刚, 高宇, 方春福, 张幸, 刘文峰. 2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 799-803.
[15] 王晓宇, 张志平, 董玉颖, 梁杰, 陈强. 老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 809-813.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed