Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (11): 941-944    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.11.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中小学生心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险与积极应对方式间的中介效应
黎旭娇1,2, 欧阳泽平1, 罗雨星1, 黄君香1, 邓树嵩2, 郭蕊2
1.右江民族医学院研究生学院,广西 百色 533000;
2.右江民族医学院公共卫生与管理学院,广西 百色 533000
Mediating effects of resilience and emotion regulation on family cumulative risk and positive coping style among primary and middle school students
LI Xujiao1,2, OUYANG Zeping1, LUO Yuxing1, HUANG Junxiang1, DENG Shusong2, GUO Rui2
1. Graduate School, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China;
2. School of Public Health and Management, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi 533000, China
全文: PDF(750 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨中小学生心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险与积极应对方式间的中介效应,为促进中小学生心理健康提供参考。方法 采用分层随机整群抽样方法抽取广西百色市3个县(区)的中小学生为调查对象,采用青少年心理韧性量表、情绪调节问卷、中国家庭功能量表和简易应对方式问卷分别调查心理韧性、情绪调节、家庭累积风险和积极应对方式;采用Process宏程序分析心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险与积极应对方式间的中介效应。结果 调查1 076人,回收有效问卷1 006份,问卷有效率为93.49%。调查对象年龄MQR)为13.00(1.00)岁;其中男生515人,占51.19%。心理韧性得分为(3.36±0.63)分,情绪调节得分为(2.26±0.56)分,家庭累积风险指数MQR)为0(0),积极应对方式得分为(1.85±0.39)分。中介效应分析结果显示,家庭累积风险可直接负向影响积极应对方式(β=-0.037,95%CI:-0.059~-0.014,P=0.011),也可通过心理韧性(β=-0.029,95%CI:-0.041~-0.017,P=0.006)或心理韧性和情绪调节(β=-0.002,95%CI:-0.004~-0.001,P=0.001)为链式中介间接负向影响积极应对方式。心理韧性的中介效应占总效应的44%,心理韧性、情绪调节的链式中介效应占总效应的3%。结论 心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险和中小学生积极应对方式间发挥负向中介作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黎旭娇
欧阳泽平
罗雨星
黄君香
邓树嵩
郭蕊
关键词 中小学生家庭累积风险心理韧性情绪调节积极应对方式中介效应    
AbstractObjective To investigate the mediating effects of resilience and emotion regulation on family cumulative risk and positive coping style among primary and middle school students, so as to provide insights into promoting psychological health among them. Methods The primary and middle school students from three counties (districts) of Baise City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected through the stratified cluster random sampling method. Resilience, emotion regulation, family cumulative risk and positive coping style were investigated using the Resilience Scale for Chinese adolescent, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Chinese family Assessment Instrument, and Simple Coping Strategies Questionnaire, respectively. Mediating effects of resilience and emotion regulation on family cumulative risk and positive coping style were examined using Process macro program. Results Totally 1 076 questionnaires were allocated, and 1 006 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective rate of 93.49%. There were 515 boys, accounting for 51.19%. The median age was 13 (interquartile range, 1) years. The mean scores of resilience, emotion regulation and positive coping style were (3.36±0.63), (2.26±0.56) and (1.85±0.39) points, respectively. The median family cumulative risk index was 0 (interquartile range, 0). The results of mediating effects showed that family cumulative risk had a direct negative effect on positive coping style (β=-0.037, 95%CI: -0.059 to -0.014, P=0.011), and also had an indirect negative effect on positive coping style through psychological resilience (β=-0.029, 95%CI: -0.041 to -0.017, P=0.006) as a mediator or through psychological resilience and emotion regulation (β=-0.002, 95%CI: -0.004 to -0.001, P=0.001) as a chain mediator. The mediating effect of resilience contributed 44% to the total effect, while the chain mediating effect of resilience and emotion regulation contributed 3%. Conclusion Resilience and emotional regulation serve as negative mediators between family cumulative risk and positive coping style among middle and primary school students.
Key wordsprimary and middle school students    cumulative family risk    resilience    emotion regulation    positive coping style    mediating effect
收稿日期: 2024-05-06      修回日期: 2024-08-16      出版日期: 2024-11-10
中图分类号:  R395.6  
基金资助:广西自然科学基金项目(2020JJA140171)
作者简介: 黎旭娇,硕士研究生在读,公共卫生专业
通信作者: 郭蕊,E-mail:763889360@qq.com   
引用本文:   
黎旭娇, 欧阳泽平, 罗雨星, 黄君香, 邓树嵩, 郭蕊. 中小学生心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险与积极应对方式间的中介效应[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(11): 941-944.
LI Xujiao, OUYANG Zeping, LUO Yuxing, HUANG Junxiang, DENG Shusong, GUO Rui. Mediating effects of resilience and emotion regulation on family cumulative risk and positive coping style among primary and middle school students. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(11): 941-944.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.11.005      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I11/941
[1] 王晓刚,冯秋月,闫虹,等.凉山洲搬迁安置彝族社区青少年自我肯定与生活事件、压力及其应对方式的相关研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2023,40(12):957-960.
[2] WU Y,YU W Z,WU X Y,et al.Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students:a cross-sectional study[J].BMC Psychol,2020,8(1):1-11.
[3] 王俊玲,郭菲,陈祉妍.孤独感、抑郁症状在父母冲突与青少年非自杀性自伤间的中介效应研究[J].预防医学,2023,35(12):1029-1032.
[4] 赵天新. 青少年非自杀性自伤与家庭功能、情绪调节的关系研究[D].咸阳:陕西中医药大学,2021.
[5] GUO X J,PENG Q W,WU S J,et al.Perceived parenting style and Chinese nursing undergraduates' learning motivation:the chain mediating roles of self-efficacy and positive coping style[J/OL].Nurse Educ Pract,2023,68[2024-08-16].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103607.
[6] SHAO L,ZHONG J D,WU H P,et al.The mediating role of coping in the relationship between family function and resilience in adolescents and young adults who have a parent with lung cancer[J].Support Care Cancer,2022,30(6):5259-5267.
[7] 王凝雨,张忠敏,陈婷.青少年抑郁症状的影响因素研究[J].预防医学,2024,36(7):562-566,570.
[8] 解亚宁. 简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(2):53-54.
[9] SHEK D T L.Assessment of family functioning in Chinese adolescents:the Chinese version of the Family Assessment Device[J].Res Soc Work Pract,2002,12(4):502-524.
[10] 胡月琴,甘怡群.青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[J].心理学报,2008,40(8):902-912.
[11] 王力,柳恒超,李中权,等.情绪调节问卷中文版的信效度研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,15(6):503-505.
[12] 刘倩,王军利,侯莉敏.家庭累积风险与幼儿心理韧性:师幼关系的调节作用[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2023,31(9):1287-1293.
[13] PARRISH K H,THOMPSON S F,LENGUA L J.Temperament as a moderator of the association of cumulative risk with preadolescent appraisal and coping style[J].Anxiety Stress Coping,2021,34(5):513-529.
[14] 王凯,廖素群.亲子亲合对青少年积极应对方式的影响——心理韧性的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J].韶关学院学报,2022,43(8):70-75.
[15] MA A N,YANG Y,GUO S X,et al.Adolescent resilience and mobile phone addiction in Henan Province of China:impacts of chain mediating,coping style[J].PLoS One,2022,17(12):1-14.
[16] PARVINIANNASAB A M,RAKHSHAN M,MOMENNASAB M,et al.The relationship between coping strategies and resilience among adolescents with beta-thalassemia major[J].J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs,2021,34(4):329-334.
[17] ZHAO X J,WANG J,SHI C X.The influence of mental resilience on the positive coping style of air force soldiers:a moderation-mediation model[J].Front Psychol,2020,11:1-7.
[18] XIONG J M,XIE W W,ZHANG T.Cumulative risk and mental health of left-behind children in China:a moderated mediation model[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2023,20(2):1-13.
[19] LIU Y G,PAN H Y,YANG R H,et al.The relationship between test anxiety and emotion regulation:the mediating effect of psychological resilience[J].Ann Gen Psychiatry,2021,20(1):1-9.
[20] 卢雅彬. 家庭自我价值感权变性对中学生人际适应的影响:心理弹性与情绪调节的链式中介作用[D].杭州:杭州师范大学,2023.
[1] 李燕冰, 周树彤, 李莹莹, 毕善琳, 李友卫. 农村中老年慢性病患者自我效能感在家庭健康与健康素养间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 75-78,84.
[2] 王芸, 申赟魁, 刘博昊, 陈静, 张琨. 延庆区中小学生近视与超重肥胖共患现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 85-88.
[3] 夏子淇, 陈晴晴, 高四海, 吴矛矛. 温州市中小学生营养健康知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 98-101,106.
[4] 陈慧, 苗姗姗, 刘宪峰, 张慧. 新疆生产建设兵团中小学生龋齿现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 102-106.
[5] 张一, 李梦迪, 石亚锋, 苗超. 余姚市中小学生超重和肥胖现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 955-958.
[6] 李忠莲, 莫显刚, 秦素霞, 周全湘, 朱亚芬, 莫才云, 易艾晶, 陈举海. 农村老年慢性病患者孤独感、抑郁症状在家庭功能与生活满意度间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 551-556,561.
[7] 王熙, 乔婷婷. 老年人日常生活活动能力、社会参与在抑郁症状与认知功能间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 438-442.
[8] 陆丽君, 袁磊, 李殿江, 卢昆, 朱怡萱, 王志勇, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我管理行为在抑郁症状与血糖控制间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 455-459.
[9] 席胜军, 周晓红, 周易杨, 张晨烨. 拱墅区中小学生传染病防控知识、态度和行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 526-530,535.
[10] 王子睿, 张祥, 刘煜, 周潇潇. 中小学生脊柱弯曲异常与筛查性近视共患现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 336-340.
[11] 江南, 唐晓敏, 孙文韬. 膳食模式与中小学生超重肥胖的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 228-232.
[12] 黄望, 朱珊珊, 林婉曼, 徐顺徭, 王晓芒. 老年阿尔茨海默病患者社会支持在家庭弹性与生命质量间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1059-1064.
[13] 朱云娇, 顾昉, 孟佳, 李娟娟, 沈郁, 高雷. 中小学生校园欺凌及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 1-6.
[14] 江美婷, 杨文菲, 张翔, 蔡鑫, 管爱君, 曾冬阳. 老年人衰弱在社会隔离与认知功能间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 17-20.
[15] 梁薇, 任梦婷, 张文科, 杨琳, 王红雨. 滁州市中小学生脊柱侧弯筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 607-610.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed