Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 316-320    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.03.020
  卫生管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
浙江省基层疾病预防控制中心传染病疫情调查处置能力分析
王臻1,2, 陈莹2, 邢宇航2, 殷淑娟2, 张人杰2, 刘碧瑶2, 王红妹1
1.浙江大学公共卫生学院,浙江 杭州 310058;
2.浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310051
Evaluation of infectious disease outbreak investigation capabilities in grassroots Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Zhejiang Province
WANG Zhen1,2, CHEN Ying2, XING Yuhang2, YIN Shujuan2, ZHANG Renjie2, LIU Biyao2, WANG Hongmei1
1. School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China;
2. Zhengjiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China
全文: PDF(793 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省基层疾病预防控制(疾控)中心传染病疫情调查处置能力,为强化疾控中心队伍建设提供参考。方法 2024年5—6月,选择浙江省11家市级疾控中心和91家县级疾控中心的从事或参与现场流行病学调查(流调)处置的专业技术人员为调查对象,采用《全国现场流行病学调查队伍现状调查问卷》收集社会人口学信息、疫情处置和传染病疫情调查处置能力等资料。结果 调查2 316人,其中市级459人,占19.82%;县级1 857人,占80.18%。以女性、30~<40岁、本科文化程度、公共卫生与预防医学专业、中级职称和工作年限<10年为主,分别占55.79%、36.44%、72.88%、74.18%、34.72%和53.76%。参与传染病现场处置、参与流调队伍或负责流调的应急处置队伍和有传染病防控相关部门工作经历的人员比例较高,分别占81.39%、81.17%和66.80%;有现场流调相关学术报告,以及专家共识、标准和教材等撰写经历的人员比例较低,占4.15%和8.51%。浙江省基层疾控中心现场流调人员传染病疫情调查处置能力总得分为53.19±16.19,个人综合能力、暴发调查步骤和流调重要技能维度得分分别为65.15±13.90、59.75±20.77和28.65±19.32。结论 浙江省基层流调队伍已具备一定的人力储备和疫情处置经验,但整体工作年限较短,学术成果产出较少,传染病疫情调查处置能力处于中等偏下水平,尤其在现场流调重要技能方面存在明显短板。建议加强系统化培训和实战演练,提升基层应急处置能力。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王臻
陈莹
邢宇航
殷淑娟
张人杰
刘碧瑶
王红妹
关键词 疾病预防控制中心流行病学调查传染病疫情调查处置能力评估    
AbstractObjective To investigate the infectious disease investigation and response capabilities of grassroots Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Zhejiang Province, so as to provide a reference for strengthening the development of CDC workforce. Methods From May to June 2024, professional technical personnel engaged in or participating in on-site epidemiological investigation and response from 11 municipal-level CDC and 91 county-level CDC in Zhejiang Province were selected as survey participants. Data on sociodemographic information, outbreak response experience, and infectious disease investigation capabilities were collected using the National Questionnaire on the Current Status of Field Epidemiology Investigation Teams. Results A total of 2 316 individuals were surveyed, including 459 from municipal-leve CDC (19.82%) and 1 857 from county-level CDC (80.18%). The cohort was predominantly female, aged 30-<40 years, with a bachelor's degree, specialized in public health and preventive medicine, holding intermediate professional titles, and having <10 years of work experience, accounting for 55.79%, 36.44%, 72.88%, 74.18%, 34.72%, and 53.76%, respectively. A relatively high proportion of participants had experience in on-site infectious disease response (81.39%), been members of field epidemiology investigation teams or emergency response teams responsible for field epidemiology investigation (81.17%), and had prior work experience in infectious disease-related departments (66.80%). In contrast, the proportion of those who had delivered academic presentations on field epidemiology investigations (4.15%) or contributed to the development of expert consensus documents, guidelines, or textbooks (8.51%). The total score for infectious disease investigation and response capabilities among field epidemiologists investigators in grassroots CDC in Zhejiang Province was 53.19±16.19, with dimension scores of 65.15±13.90 for personal comprehensive competence, 59.75±20.77 for outbreak investigation procedures, and 28.65±19.32 for essential epidemiological investigation skills. Conclusions The grassroots field epidemiology investigation teams in Zhejiang Province have developed a certain level of workforce capacity and outbreak response experience. However, they generally exhibit relatively short work tenures, limited academic outputs, and moderate-to-low proficiency in infectious disease investigation and management, particularly with notable gaps in critical field investigation skills. It is recommended to strengthen systematic training and practical exercises to enhance grassroots emergency response capabilities.
Key wordsCenter for Disease Control and Prevention    epidemiological investigation    infectious disease epidemic investigation and response    capability assessment
收稿日期: 2025-11-12      修回日期: 2026-02-09      出版日期: 2026-03-10
中图分类号:  R197  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2023KY084); 浙江省疾病预防控制科技计划项目(2025JK146,2025JK167); 浙江省社科基金青年项目(24NDQN182YBM)
作者简介: 王臻,硕士研究生在读,主任医师,主要从事卫生应急管理工作
通信作者: 王红妹,E-mail:rosa@zju.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
王臻, 陈莹, 邢宇航, 殷淑娟, 张人杰, 刘碧瑶, 王红妹. 浙江省基层疾病预防控制中心传染病疫情调查处置能力分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 316-320.
WANG Zhen, CHEN Ying, XING Yuhang, YIN Shujuan, ZHANG Renjie, LIU Biyao, WANG Hongmei. Evaluation of infectious disease outbreak investigation capabilities in grassroots Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Zhejiang Province. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(3): 316-320.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.03.020      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I3/316
[1] CAO Y L,SHAN J,GONG Z Z,et al.Status and challenges of public health emergency management in China related to COVID-19[J/OL].Front Public Health,2020,8[2026-02-09].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00250.
[2] 孙点剑一,李立明.浅谈公共卫生与疾病预防控制体系建设[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(9):1096-1104.
[3] 国务院办公厅.关于推动疾病预防控制事业高质量发展的指导意见[EB/OL].[2026-02-09].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202312/content_6922483.htm.
[4] 申锦玉,牛建军,陈敏,等.疾控机构突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价指标探讨[J].现代预防医学,2011,38(1):64-66.
[5] 贺金,冯海哲,杨星,等.贵州省市县两级疾控机构应急人员卫生应急能力自我认知调查及影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(13):2459-2464.
[6] 李文静,蔡剑,王明斋,等.中国县(区)级疾病预防控制中心流行病学调查人员传染病疫情调查处置能力及影响因素研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2025,46(5):796-802.
[7] 中共中央国务院.“健康中国2030”规划纲要[EB/OL].[2026-02-09].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
[8] 杨叶. 四川省基层疾病预防控制中心传染病防控能力现状研究[D].成都:成都医学院,2023.
[9] 张俊琪. 山东省县级疾控机构应急人员应急工作能力现状研究[D].济南:山东大学,2023.
[10] IRVIN C B,CINDRICH L,PATTERSON W,et al.Survey of hospital healthcare personnel response during a potential avian influenza pandemic:will they come to work?[J].Prehosp Disaster Med,2008,23(4):328-335.
[11] 刘慧慧,张丽杰,施国庆,等.地方现场流行病学培训项目实施效果定性调查[J].中国公共卫生管理,2014,30(3):364-366.
[12] 曾纯,李世哲,刘文睿,等.江西省疾病预防控制机构专业人员科研创新现况及影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(6):1148-1152.
[13] 先德强,陈俊南,宋天银,等.泸州市疾控机构专业技术人员科研能力及培训需求分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2023,39(9):1095-1100,1106.
[14] 吴丹,胡东达,孙梅,等.我国CDC突发公共卫生事件应急处置能力与现状分析[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(7):30-37.
[15] 刘慧慧,张丽杰,施国庆,等.我国省市县现场流行病学培训项目现况调查[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2014,13(5):490-493.
[16] JONES D S,DICKER R C,FONTAINE R E,et al.Building global epidemiology and response capacity with field epidemiology training programs[J].Emerg Infect Dis,2017,23(13):158-165.
[17] 张娜,王坤,毛阿燕,等.我国疾病预防控制机构职责的历史演变及现实困境与发展方向[J].中国公共卫生,2024,40(6):765-769.
[1] 张辉, 年云鹏, 李华, 张磊乐, 兰宁, 李小虎. 一起职业技术学校GⅡ型诺如病毒急性胃肠炎暴发疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 917-921.
[2] 唐学雯, 白祎然, 苏颖, 龚黎明, 严睿, 朱瑶, 何寒青. 一例急性弛缓性麻痹病例检出疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 178-180,188.
[3] 徐伟, 林云, 朱国英, 宋和佳, 贾娟娟, 孙炀明. 一例孕妇ST2型单核细胞增生李斯特菌感染的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 189-191.
[4] 莫非, 刘千秋, 李嘉璇, 张子薇, 王哲, 黄烈雨, 郭岩. 疾病预防控制中心办公室科研能力调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(12): 1292-1296.
[5] 范军, 金宇雅, 高围溦. 基于集聚度的我国疾病预防控制中心人力资源配置公平性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 86-91.
[6] 李卫丹, 张子根. 一起利福平耐药肺结核聚集性疫情的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 630-632,635.
[7] 褚堃, 石小俊, 姜海波, 裴学丽, 谭诗文, 史宏博, 叶泽豪, 杨建辉, 张丹丹. 一起故意传播艾滋病事件的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 232-234.
[8] 张红芳, 王国华, 刘建, 钱华, 唐涛. 一起羊羔屠宰点传播的布鲁氏菌病疫情流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 887-888,892.
[9] 谢赐福, 熊姿, 宋丽新, 尹鹏亮. 一起幼儿园人腺病毒感染暴发疫情流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 889-892.
[10] 黎燕, 雷梦婷, 王燧, 殷淑娇, 章存瑞, 李清春. 一起涉及多所学校的肺结核聚集性疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 607-610.
[11] 郭荣, 郜振国, 刘艳, 王蓉, 张玲, 马合木提, 刘万里, 刘伦光. 新疆巩留县一起炭疽暴发疫情的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 418-420,424.
[12] 富小飞, 刘砚清, 顾伟玲, 亓云鹏, 姚立农, 阮卫. 1例边境输入间日疟病例的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 68-70.
[13] 宋蕴奇, 刁文丽. 辽宁省疾控机构食品安全事故流行病学调查人力资源分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 848-850.
[14] 陈双燕, 段恬筱, 翁健. 一起误饮川乌药酒致乌头碱中毒事件调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1170-1171.
[15] 王宇红, 张薇, 张晓宇, 马汉平, 王昭君, 张艳, 苏延军, 李红蓉. 兰州市报告的首起新型冠状病毒肺炎家庭聚集性疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 891-894.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed