Abstract：ObjectiveTo develop a quantitative scoring system for the House-Tree-Person (H-T-P) test. MethodsBy literature review and expert consultation, preliminary evaluation items were defined. After pilot test, the scoring system for assessing depression were defined. A total of 216 cases of patients with depressive mood disorder from the Tong De hosptial of the Zhejiang Province were tested. The reliability and validity of a scoring system of house-tree-person test for depression were analyzed. ResultsThe scoring system of depression evaluation including 23 items and 5 factors, could explain 77.50% of the cumulative total variance. The split-half reliability of the system was 0.87 and 0.88, and the internal consistency reliability of the system was 0.81. The Kappa coefficient of each item was 0.71-0.89 (P<0.01). The standard validity of the scale was 0.65, and the criterion validity of each factor was 0.34-0.60 (P<0.01). The critical point of positive demarcation was 4, and the critical point of positive demarcation of each factor was 1. The Kappa value of the consistency test was 0.85 with the PHI Depression Inventory. ConclusionThis study demonstrates H-T-P scoring system has acceptable validity and internal consistency.
汤路瀚, 徐方忠, 周婉宁. 房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统信效度研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 1-4.
TANG Lu-han, XU Fang-zhong, ZHOU Wan-ning. An analysis on the reliability and validity of a scoring system of house-tree-person test for depression. Preventive Medicine, 2016, 28(1): 1-4.
[1] BUCK J N. The H-T-P technique:a qualitative and quantitative scoring manual[J].Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1948(4): 151-159. [2] CAMARA W,NATHAN J,PUENTE A.Psychological test usage in professional psychology:report to the APA practice and science directorates[M].Washington,DC:ed.APA press,1998. [3] BUCK J N. The House Tree Person Technique Revised Manual[M]. Los Angeles: CWPS,1977. [4] LI C Y, CHUNG L I, HSIUNG P C, et al. A psychometric study of the Kinetic-House-Tree-Person scoring system for people with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan[J]. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2014, 24(1): 20-27. [5] 蔡頠,汤永隆,吴嵩,等.投射测验体系中的树木意象[J].心理科学进展 ,2012, 20(5): 782-790. [6] 巩凯旋,高柏慧,刘浩,等.动力房树人测验在大学生应用的计分研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(1):80-83. [7] 宁式颖,郑璐,李响,等.房树人测验用于评估青少年抑郁的应用研究[J].中国临床研究,2015,28(3):305-307. [8] 中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001. [9] 中国科学院心理所,普森人格评估中心.精神健康测验(PHI)问卷及手册[Z]. 1993:3. [10] 孟沛欣,郑日昌.西方绘画评定的进展[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004, 18(2): 100-102. [11] ANDERSON F E. Needed: A major collaborative effort[J]. Art Therapy: Journal of the American art therapy Association, 2001, 18(2): 74-78. [12] PALMER L,FARRAR A R,VALLE M,et al.An investigation of the clinical use of the House-Tree-Person projective drawings in the psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse[J]. Child Maltreat , 2000,5(2):169-175. [13] ZALSMAN G,NETANEL R,FISCHEL T,et al. Human figure drawings in the evaluation of severe adolescent suicidal behavior[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,2000,39(8):1024-1031. [14] REYHER L H J. Figure drawing anxiety indexes:a review of the literature[J].Journal of Projective Techniques & Personality Assessment,1965,29(3):310. [15] BUCK J N. House-tree-person manual and interpretive guide[M]. Los Angeles:CWPS, 1992.
