Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2018, Vol. 30 Issue (5): 450-454    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2018.05.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
房树人测验人格评估计分系统的信度和效度研究
汤路瀚1, 周婉宁2, 余鸽1, 张媛媛1, 徐方忠1
1.浙江省立同德医院临床心理科,浙江 杭州 310012;
2. 浙江理工大学心理系
The reliability and validity evaluation of a personality scoring system for house-tree-person test
TANG Lu-han*, ZHOU Wan-ning, YU Ge, ZHANG Yuan-yuan, XU Fang-zhong
*Clinical Psychology Department,Tong De Hosptial of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310013,China
全文: PDF(483 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价房树人测验人格评估计分系统的信度和效度。方法 对浙江省立同德医院临床心理科就诊的257名心理正常的咨询者进行房树人测验,用拟定的36项人格评估条目进行评分,采用项目分与总分相关法进行项目分析,采用因子分析法检验结构效度;以Y-G人格测验量表为效标检验效标效度;检验内部一致性信度和评分者一致性信度。结果 36项人格评估条目的 发生率为7.78%~64.20%,所有评估条目得分与总分均存在相关关系(P<0.05)。该人格评估计分系统共包含6个因子,分别为不稳定性、活动性、社会向性、随意性、自卑性和支配性,累计解释总方差的74.93%。效标关联效度为-0.28~0.47(P<0.01)。内部一致性信度系数Cronbach's α为0.88,评分者信度Kappa系数均≥0.70(P<0.01)。结论 房树人测验人格评估计分系统包含6个因子36个条目,信度和效度较好。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
汤路瀚
周婉宁
余鸽
张媛媛
徐方忠
关键词 房树人测验人格量化信度效度    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the reliablity and validity of a quantitative personality scoring system of house-tree-person test(HTP). Methods Based on the identified 36 drawing characteristics relating to personality,we recruited 257 individual cases of asymptomatic to assess its psychometric attributes. They were instructed to draw HTP pictures,and were then asked to complete Y-G personality test. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the personality scoring system we built. Results The occurrence rate of the 36 items ranged from 7.78% to 64.20%. There was correlation between the score of each item and the total score(P < 0.05),so all the items were retained. This personality scoring system contains six factors,namely“instability”,“activity”,“social orientation”,“randomness”,“inferiority”and“dominance”,and the accumulated variance was 74.93%. The criterion validity was -0.28-0.47(P < 0.01). The internal consistency reliability of the system was 0.88(P < 0.01);the raters’ Kappa coefficients for each item are all above 0.70(P < 0.01). Conclusion The personality scoring system has 36 items which are categorized into six factors. This study demonstrates our proposed HTP personality scoring system has eminently acceptable reliability and validity.
Key wordsHouse-tree-person test    Personality    Quantitative    Reliability    Validity
收稿日期: 2017-09-18      出版日期: 2018-05-22
ZTFLH:  R395  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划骨干人才项目(2A21636); 国家中医药管理局国家重点学科建设计划; 浙江省医药卫生科技计划重点项目(2012ZDA006)
通信作者: 徐方忠,E-mail:fangzhongxu@163.com   
作者简介: 汤路瀚,硕士,主管心理治疗师,主要从事临床心理学工作
引用本文:   
汤路瀚, 周婉宁, 余鸽, 张媛媛, 徐方忠. 房树人测验人格评估计分系统的信度和效度研究[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 450-454.
TANG Lu-han, ZHOU Wan-ning, YU Ge, ZHANG Yuan-yuan, XU Fang-zhong. The reliability and validity evaluation of a personality scoring system for house-tree-person test. Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(5): 450-454.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2018.05.005      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2018/V30/I5/450
[1] BUCK J N.The H-T-P technique; a qualitative and quantitative scoring manual[J]. J Clin Psychol,1948,4(4):317.
[2] 张凤华,吴倩. 房树人测验在国内的应用研究[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志,2015,21(5):111-113.
[3] ANDERSON F E.Needed:a major collaborative effort[J]. Art Therapy,2001,18(2):74-78.
[4] KATO D,SUZUKI M.Developing a scale to measure total impression of synthetic house-tree-person drawings[J]. Social Behavior and Personality:an International Journal,2016,44(1):19-28.
[5] LI C Y,CHUNG Y,HSIUNG P C,et al.A psychometric study of the Kinetic-House-Tree-Person Scoring System for people with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan[J]. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy,2014,24(1):20-27.
[6] 汤路瀚,徐方忠,周婉宁. 房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统信效度研究[J]. 浙江预防医学,2016,28(1):1-4.
[7] 巩凯旋,高柏慧,刘浩,等.动力房树人测验在大学生应用的计分研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(1):80-83.
[8] 王斐. 大学生房树人投射测验编码系统的建立与信效度初探[J]. 科教文汇,2015(12):137-140.
[9] 孔克勤,叶奕乾,杨秀君.个性心理学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006:245-249.
[10] 杨晓斌,张雨青,张涵诗,等. HTP投射测验与EPQ问卷测验的相关性研究[J]. 中国卫生统计,2015,32(3):443-445.
[11] 陈涛,裴欢昌,王鹏,等.青少年依赖型人格障碍倾向的绘画评估诊断[J]. 中国特殊教育,2015(2):59-64.
[12] LANGE-KÜTTNER C,KERZMANN A,HECKHAUSEN J. The emergence of visually realistic contour in the drawing of the human figure[J]. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2002,20(3):439-463.
[13] ISAKSSON C,NORLÉN A K,ENGLUND B,et al. Changes in self-image as seen in tree paintings[J]. The Arts in Psychotherapy,2009,36(5):304-312.
[14] ZALSMAN G,NETANEL R,FISCHEL T,et al.Human figure drawings in the evaluation of severe adolescent suicidal behavior[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2000,39(8):1024-1031.
[15] KATO D,SUZUKI M.Personality traits and the expression area of synthetic house-tree-person drawings in early adolescent Japanese[J]. Psychological Thought,2016,9(1):67-74.
[16] 邱鸿钟,吴东梅.抑郁症患者明尼苏达多项人格测验与房树人绘画特征的相关性研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2010,18(11):1341-1344.
[17] HAMMER E F.Negro and white children's personality adjustment as revealed by a comparison of their drawings (H-T-P)[J]. J Clin Psychol,1953,9(1):7-10.
[18] GROTH-MARNAT G,ROBERTS L.Human figure drawings and house tree person drawings as indicators of self-esteem:a quantitative approach[J]. J Clin Psychol,1998,54(2):219-222.
[1] 张筱晗, 倪春辉. 数字健康素养量表在医学院学生调查中的信度和效度检验[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 409-412.
[2] 蒋丹丹,周文哲,郑森国,陈燕燕. 学龄期儿童用眼行为调查问卷的信度和效度检验[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 255-259.
[3] 董芬,王勍,董朝晖,罗尹. 公交车驾驶员人格特征与驾龄的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(12): 1213-1216.
[4] 魏澹宁, 汤军, 沈淑华, 包文婷. 公民中医养生保健素养调查问卷的信度和效度分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(9): 960-963.
[5] 沈志华, 汪永光, 王义强. Barratt冲动性量表在大学生心理健康网络调查中的信效度检验[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(4): 368-371.
[6] 汤路瀚, 徐方忠, 周婉宁. 房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统信效度研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 1-4.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed