Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (12): 1201-1205    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.12.003
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
男男性行为人群暴露前预防使用的影响因素分析
李欣格, 王丽娟, 宋亮, 丁海峰, 高彦杰
北京市朝阳区疾病预防控制中心,北京 100020
Factors affecting pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men
LI Xinge, WANG Lijuan, SONG Liang, DING Haifeng, GAO Yanjie
Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100020, China
全文: PDF(794 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解男男性行为(MSM)人群暴露前预防(PrEP)使用的影响因素,为提高MSM人群PrEP使用,优化艾滋病防控策略提供依据。方法 于2024年3—5月,在北京“淡蓝公益”社会组织的HIV抗体检测点采用方便抽样方法抽取MSM进行问卷调查,收集社会人口学信息、艾滋病基本知识知晓情况、性取向和性行为、近6个月内使用PrEP和暴露后预防(PEP)情况等。采用多因素logistic回归模型和决策树模型分析MSM人群PrEP使用的影响因素。结果 调查MSM 414人,年龄为(33.52±8.50)岁;大专及以上文化程度345人,占83.33%;性取向以同性恋为主,265人占64.01%;近6个月内同性性伴人数以1~2人为主,182人43.96%;近6个月内使用过PEP 39人,占9.42%。近6个月内使用过PrEP 68人,使用率为16.43%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,文化程度(大专及以上,OR=28.200,95%CI:3.162~251.519)、近6个月内同性性伴人数(3~5人,OR=3.963,95%CI:1.065~14.755;≥6人,OR=7.518,95%CI:1.829~30.910)和近6个月内使用过PEP(OR=18.606,95%CI:7.587~45.631)是MSM人群PrEP使用的影响因素。决策树模型结果显示,文化程度、性取向和近6个月内同性性伴人数是MSM人群PrEP使用的影响因素,其中近6个月内同性性伴人数是主要影响因素,近6个月内同性性伴人数≥3人且性取向为同性恋或异性恋的MSM PrEP使用率为38.46%。结论 MSM人群PrEP使用与文化程度、近6个月内同性性伴人数、近6个月内使用PEP和性取向有关。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李欣格
王丽娟
宋亮
丁海峰
高彦杰
关键词 暴露前预防男男性行为人群多因素logistic回归模型决策树模型影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the factors affecting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM), so as to provide a basis for improving PrEP uptake among MSM and optimizing HIV prevention and control strategies. Methods The MSM were recruited at a HIV testing site of the "Danlan Public Welfare" organization in Beijing Municipality using the convenient sampling method from March to May 2024. Sociodemographic information, awareness of basic AIDS knowledge, sexual orientation and behaviors, the use of PrEP and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in the past six months were collected using the questionnaire survey. Multivariable logistic regression model and decision tree model were used to analyze the influencing factors for PrEP use among MSM. Results A total of 414 participants were surveyed, with a mean age of (33.52±8.50) years. Among them, 345 individuals (83.33%) had a college degree and above. The predominant sexual orientation was homosexual, with 265 individuals, accounting for 64.01%. The majority reported having 1 to 2 same-sex partners in the past six months, with 182 individuals (43.96%). A total of 39 individuals (9.42%) had used PEP in the past six months. A total of 68 individuals (16.43%) had used PrEP during the same period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that educational attainment (college degree and above, OR=28.200, 95%CI: 3.162-251.519), the number of same-sex partners in the past six months (3-5 partners, OR=3.963, 95%CI: 1.065-14.755; ≥6 partners, OR=7.518, 95%CI: 1.829-30.910), and the use of PEP in the past six months (OR=18.606, 95%CI: 7.587-45.631) were significant factors associated with PrEP use among MSM. The decision tree model identified educational level, sexual orientation, and the number of same-sex partners in the past six months as factors affecting PrEP use among MSM. Among these, the number of same-sex partners in the past six months emerged as the primary influencing factor. The use of PrEP was 38.46% among MSM who had ≥3 same-sex partners in the past six months and identified as homosexual or heterosexual. Conclusion The use of PrEP among MSM is primarily associated with educational level, the number of same-sex partners in the past six months, use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in the past six months, and sexual orientation.
Key wordspre-exposure prophylaxis    men who have sex with men    multivariable logistic regression model    decision tree model    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2025-07-18      修回日期: 2025-11-24      出版日期: 2025-12-10
中图分类号:  R512.91  
作者简介: 李欣格,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事性病、艾滋病防控工作
通信作者: 王丽娟,E-mail:waque913@163.com   
引用本文:   
李欣格, 王丽娟, 宋亮, 丁海峰, 高彦杰. 男男性行为人群暴露前预防使用的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(12): 1201-1205.
LI Xinge, WANG Lijuan, SONG Liang, DING Haifeng, GAO Yanjie. Factors affecting pre-exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(12): 1201-1205.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.12.003      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I12/1201
[1] 潘蕴蛟,林丽,吴守丽,等.艾滋病暴露前预防用药技术推广应用的伦理困境及对策[J].医学与哲学,2024,45(21):40-43.
PAN Y J,LIN L,WU S L,et al.Ethical dilemmas and countermeasures in the promotion and application of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis technology[J].Med Philos,2024,45(21):40-43.(in Chinese)
[2] World Health Organization.Global state of PrEP[EB/OL].[2025-11-24] .https://www.who.int/groups/global-prep-network/global-state-of-prep.
[3] 夏冬艳,苏雪丽,刘国武,等.北京市男男性行为者HIV新发感染率与高危行为及接受暴露前后预防用药服务情况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(9):1390-1396.
XIA D Y,SU X L,LIU G W,et al.Investigation on new HIV infection rate,high-risk behavior and preventive drug service before and after exposure among men who have sex with men in Beijing[J].Chin J Epidemiol,2023,44(9):1390-1396.(in Chinese)
[4] 张路坤,王辉.中国HIV暴露前预防用药专家共识(2023版)[J].中国艾滋病性病,2023,29(9):954-961.
ZHANG L K,WANG H.Expert consensus on preventive medication before HIV exposure in China(2023 edition)[J].Chin J AIDS STD,2023,29(9):954-961.(in Chinese)
[5] 马丽娟. 我国艾滋病防治督导与评估系统能力评价研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2013.
MA L J.Research on capability evaluation of AIDS prevention and control supervision and evaluation system in China[D].Hefei:Anhui Medical University,2013.(in Chinese)
[6] PENG Q L,LIU X N,TANG X,et al.Low rate of pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis uptake and high prevalence of transmitted drug resistance among newly diagnosed primary HIV infections in Shenzhen,China:a real-world retrospective study[J].Chin Med J,2022,135(22):2730-2737.
[7] 李翔,赵宇博,任强,等.陕西省男男性行为人群HIV暴露前预防药物的知晓、使用意愿及使用现状分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2024,45(12):1679-1684.
LI X,ZHAO Y B,REN Q,et al.Awareness,willingness,and status of using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Shaanxi Province[J].Chin J Epidemiol,2024,45(12):1679-1684.(in Chinese)
[8] HOLLOWAY I W,TAN D E,GILDNER J L,et al.Facilitators and barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis willingness among young men who have sex with men who use geosocial networking applications in California[J].AIDS Patient Care STDS,2017,31(12):517-527.
[9] GUO J H,KANG W T,LIU T T,et al.Analysis of knowledge level and use of antiretroviral pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis among MSM - China,2019-2022[J].China CDC Weekly,2023,5(13):292-296.
[10] MACAPAGAL K,KRAUS A,KORPAK A K,et al.PrEP awareness,uptake,barriers,and correlates among adolescents assigned male at birth who have sex with males in the U.S[J].Arch Sex Behav,2020,49(1):113-124.
[11] BLAIR K J,TORRES T S,HOAGLAND B,et al.Moderating effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis use on the association between sexual risk behavior and perceived risk of HIV among Brazilian gay,bisexual,and other men who have sex with men:cross-sectional study[J/OL].JMIR Public Health Surveill,2023[2025-11-24] .https://doi.org/10.2196/45134.
[12] YEO T E D.Reconciling intimacy and safety:a qualitative systematic review of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation among gay and bisexual men[J].Cult Health Sex,2024,26(7):952-967.
[13] LUO R,XIE Z,SILENZIO V M B,et al.Gay app use,sexuality traits,and high-risk sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men in China:mediation analysis[J/OL].J Med Internet Res,2023,25[2025-11-24] .https://doi.org/10.2196/49137.
[14] 何佳晋,居豪,吴超,等.中国MSM人群HIV新发感染率及其影响因素的Meta分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(1):70-77.
HE J J,JU H,WU C,et al.Meta-analysis of new HIV infection rate and its influencing factors among MSM in China[J].China Prev Med J,2022,34(1):70-77.(in Chinese)
[15] WANG H Y,SHOBOWALE O,DEN DAAS C,et al.Determinants of PrEP uptake,intention and awareness in the Netherlands:a socio-spatial analysis[J/OL].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022,19(14)[2025-11-24] . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148829.
[16] LIU Y Y,SIDDIQI K A,CHO H,et al.Demographics,trends,and clinical characteristics of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis recipients and people newly diagnosed with HIV from large electronic health records in Florida[J].AIDS Patient Care STDS,2024,38(1):14-22.
[17] 夏永玲,张海芳,陶桃,等.丽水市MSM人群HIV定期检测及暴露后预防调查[J].预防医学,2024,36(6):465-469.
XIA Y L,ZHANG H F,TAO T,et al.Regular HIV testing and post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Lishui City[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(6):465-469.(in Chinese)
[1] 陶桃, 张海芳, 凡鹏飞, 李秋华, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市老年肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 892-896,902.
[2] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
[3] 姜艳, 李锦成, 许纯, 杨科佼, 杨文彬, 徐胜. 扬州市MSM人群艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓率调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 903-906,912.
[4] 翟羽佳, 章涛, 古雪, 徐乐, 吴梦娜, 林君芬, 吴晨. 社区老年人认知衰弱现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 762-766,772.
[5] 苏德华, 陈向阳, 李君, 赵丽娜, 张鹤美, 朱婷婷, 胡文雪, 赖江宜. 温州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗及时性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 804-808.
[6] 严青秀, 王炜, 郝晓刚, 高宇, 方春福, 张幸, 刘文峰. 2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 799-803.
[7] 王晓宇, 张志平, 董玉颖, 梁杰, 陈强. 老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 809-813.
[8] 王海琪, 张涵潇, 杨凤云, 国献丽, 范生荣, 张丽锋, 蒋泓. 嘉定区中学生抑郁情绪调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 832-836.
[9] 成灵灵, 阎亚琼, 白增华, 张晓刚, 郝丽婷, 杨慧莹. 先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿年龄别体质指数Z评分变化轨迹及影响因素[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 858-863.
[10] 陈强, 郭震, 朱玮, 何晓庆, 朱斌斌. 金华市重点人群职业健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 747-750,756.
[11] 王立新, 王浩, 何青芳, 方雨葭, 张洁, 杜晓甫. 浙江省居民限盐勺使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 668-672.
[12] 林飞云, 周敏聪, 陈晓雯. 高龄经产妇产后抑郁症状及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 732-736.
[13] 何欢, 赵雪, 蔡鹏, 詹小亚, 马蕾. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动恐惧的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 659-663.
[14] 汪小梅, 郑杉, 翁晓飞. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者二元应对水平的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 664-667,672.
[15] 杨雨欣, 邵银燕, 李艳娟. 中医养生保健素养及影响因素研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 577-582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed