Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (6): 567-572    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.06.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
应用德尔菲法构建大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系
任艳军, 徐虹, 金涛, 吕烨, 李朝康, 谭若云
杭州市疾病预防控制中心(杭州市卫生监督所),浙江 杭州 310021
Index system of public health risk assessment for air pollution emergency based on Delphi method
REN Yanjun, XU Hong, JIN Tao, LÜ Ye, LI Chaokang, TAN Ruoyun
Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Hangzhou Institute of Public Health Supervision), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
全文: PDF(897 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系,为评估大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险提供工具。方法 通过文献复习、研究小组讨论初步建立大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标,邀请环境健康、毒理学、流行病学、卫生应急和大气监测等领域15名专家经2轮咨询确定指标体系,采用积极系数、权威系数和协调程度评价咨询效果;采用专家评分法和熵权法的组合赋权方法计算指标权重。结果 15名专家参与咨询,其中男性11人,女性4人;博士研究生8人,硕士研究生6人,本科1人;正高级职称11人,副高级职称4人;工作年限为(23.73±10.48)年。2轮咨询的积极系数分别为83.33%和100.00%,权威系数分别为0.794和0.811,各项指标重要性、可行性和敏感性评分的变异系数分别为0.097~0.352、0.078~0.478、0.115~0.388和0.049~0.133、0.052~0.153、0.049~0.178,肯德尔协调系数分别为0.237和0.440(均P<0.05)。构建的指标体系包括“可能性”“危害性”“脆弱性”“可控性”4个一级指标,综合权重分别为0.206 7、0.059 6、0.378 1和0.355 5;13个二级指标中“监测能力”的综合权重最高,为0.192 6;40个三级指标中“大气污染物实时监测”“前期预报结果回溯评价”“大气污染物种类、数量和联合作用”“人群接触大气污染物的暴露方式”的综合权重较高,分别为0.089 5、0.043 1、0.041 1和0.040 3。结论 本研究构建的大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系可用于大气污染突发事件的公共卫生风险评估。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
任艳军
徐虹
金涛
吕烨
李朝康
谭若云
关键词 大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估德尔菲法    
AbstractObjective To construct an index system of public health risk assessment for air pollution emergency, so as to provide a tool of evaluating the public health risks of air pollution emergency. Methods Index system of public health risk assessment for air pollution emergency was established through literature review and group discussions. The index system was determined through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations involving specialists in environmental health, toxicology, epidemiology, health emergency response, and atmospheric monitoring. The effectiveness of the consultation was evaluated by positive coefficient, authority coefficient and coordination coefficient. The weights of index were determined using a combination weighting method of the expert scoring method and the entropy weight method. Results Fifteen experts participated in the consultation, including 11 males and 4 females. There were 8 experts with a doctor degree, 6 experts with a master degree, 1 experts with a bachelor degree. A total of 11 experts with senior professional titles, and 4 experts with associate senior professional titles. The average work experience was (23.73±10.48) years. The expert positive coefficients for the two rounds of consultations were 83.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficients were 0.794 and 0.811, respectively. The coefficients of variation for the importance, feasibility, and sensitivity scores of each index in the two rounds of comsultations were 0.097 to 0.352, 0.078 to 0.478, 0.115 to 0.388, and 0.049 to 0.133, 0.052 to 0.153, 0.049 to 0.178, respectively. The Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.237 and 0.440 (both with P<0.05) for the two rounds of consultations. The constructed assessment index system included "likelihood" "hazard" "vulnerability" "controllability" with comprehensive weights of 0.206 7, 0.059 6, 0.378 1, and 0.355 5, respectively. Among the 13 second indicators, "monitoring capability" had the highest comprehensive weight of 0.192 6. Among the 40 tertiary indicators, "real-time monitoring of atmospheric pollutants" "retrospective evaluation of early forecasting results" "types, quantities, and combined effects of atmospheric pollutants" "exposure modes of the population to atmospheric pollutants" had relatively high comprehensive weights of 0.089 5, 0.043 1, 0.041 1 and 0.040 3, respectively. Conclusion The constructed index system of public health risk assessment for air pollution emergency can be applied to the public health risk assessment for air pollution emergencies.
Key wordsair pollution    emergency    public health    risk assessment    Delphi method
收稿日期: 2025-03-18      修回日期: 2025-05-22      出版日期: 2025-06-10
中图分类号:  R122  
基金资助:杭州市医药卫生科技重点项目(ZD20230031)
作者简介: 任艳军,硕士,主任医师,主要从事疾病预防与控制工作
通信作者: 徐虹,E-mail:xuhong@hzcdc.com.cn   
引用本文:   
任艳军, 徐虹, 金涛, 吕烨, 李朝康, 谭若云. 应用德尔菲法构建大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 567-572.
REN Yanjun, XU Hong, JIN Tao, LÜ Ye, LI Chaokang, TAN Ruoyun. Index system of public health risk assessment for air pollution emergency based on Delphi method. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(6): 567-572.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.06.006      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I6/567
[1] 郭新彪,刘君卓.突发公共卫生事件应急指引[M].3版.北京:化学工业出版社,2022.
GUO X B,LIU J Z.Emergency Guidelines for Public Health Emergencies[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2022.(in Chinese)
[2] 张亚利,蔡剑,裴迎新,等.我国各级疾病预防控制机构突发事件公共卫生风险评估工作现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(9):1462-1466.
ZHANG Y L,CAI J,PEI Y X,et al.A survey of performance of public health risk assessment in emergencies of institutions for disease control and prevention at different levels in China[J].Chin J Epidemiol,2023,44(9):1462-1466.(in Chinese)
[3] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.大气污染人群健康风险评估技术规范:WS/T 666—2019[EB/OL].[2025-05-22].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/pgw/202003/fb4c325cb7a0491db7723fa
91f6b9387.shtml.
[4] 岑琼,蒋旸,降菁月,等.应用德尔菲法构建儿童家长口腔健康素养评价指标体系[J].预防医学,2024,36(3):193-197.
CEN Q,JIANG Y,JIANG J Y,et al.Evaluation index system of oral health literacy for childrene's parents based on Delphi method[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(3):193-197.(in Chinese)
[5] 陈银炜,周洋,刘珍,等.流动人口HIV感染孕产妇健康综合评价指标体系研究[J].预防医学,2023,35(3):210-214.
CHEN Y W,ZHOU Y,LIU Z,et al.Construction of comprehensive health evaluation index system for HIV-infected pregnant and lying-in women in floating populations[J].China Prev Med J,2023,35(3):210-214.(in Chinese)
[6] 柴鑫,崔佳,叶丽红,等.基于德尔菲法探索中国老年人群健康长寿实施策略[J].中华预防医学杂志,2024,58(6):883-890.
CHAI X,CUI J,YE L H,et al.Exploring implementation strategies for healthy longevity among the elderly population in China based on the delphi method[J].Chin J Prev Med,2024,58(6):883-890.(in Chinese)
[7] 高丽娟,井淇,郑文贵,等.县级疾病预防控制中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系构建[J].预防医学,2023,35(8):659-664.
GAO L J,JING Q,ZHENG W G,et al.Construction of an evaluation index system of public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level centers for disease control and prevention[J].China Prev Med J,2023,35(8):659-664.(in Chinese)
[8] 孙振球,徐勇勇.医学统计学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2019.
SUN Z Q,XU Y Y.Medical Statistics[M].4th ed.Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2019.(in Chinese)
[9] 鲁志鸿,李友卫,郭栋,等.县级中医医院中医服务能力评价指标体系构建[J].中华医院管理杂志,2022,38(11):847-851.
LU Z H,LI Y W,GUO D,et al.Construction of the evaluation index system on TCM service capability of county-level hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine[J].Chin J Hosp Admin,2022,38(11):847-851.(in Chinese)
[10] 刘巧,刘民,刘珏.我国疟疾消除后阶段输入风险评估指标体系的构建[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(1):67-73.
LIU Q,LIU M,LIU J.Construction of an indicator system for risk assessment on imported malaria during post-elimination period in China[J].Chin J Epidemiol,2023,44(1):67-73.(in Chinese)
[11] 中国疾病预防控制中心.突发事件公共卫生风险评估技术方案(试行)[EB/OL].[2025-05-22].https://www.chinacdc.cn/jkyj/tfggws/jswj1/201708/t20170810_301463.html.
[12] 王若楠,余伯韬,何艳婷,等.中国省域突发公共卫生事件应急系统脆弱性评价及驱动因素分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2022,39(10):730-735.
WANG R N,YU B T,HE Y T,et al.Vulnerability evaluation and driving factors analysis of provincial public health emergency system in China[J].Chin Health Servi Mana,2022,39(10):730-735.(in Chinese)
[13] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.环境空气质量指数(AQI)技术规定(试行):HJ 633—2012[EB/OL].[2025-05-22].https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/jcffbz/201203/t20120302_224166.shtml.
[14] 浙江省生态环境厅.浙江省重污染天气应急预案[EB/OL].[2025-05-22].http://sthjt.zj.gov.cn/art/2024/5/13/art_1229589223_58956228.html.
[15] 何晓庆,罗进斌,陈强,等.基于大气污染物与寿命损失年的金华市空气质量健康指数构建研究[J].预防医学,2024,36(12):1017-1021.
HE X Q,LUO J B,CHEN Q,et al.Construction of air quality health index in Jinhua City based on air pollutants and years of life lost[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(12):1017-1021.(in Chinese)
[1] 周璇, 吴苗苗, 何以晴, 苏芳, 丁金霞, 谢伦芳. 德尔菲法构建宫颈癌防治素养评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 413-416,420.
[2] 张涛, 杜治平, 王祚懿, 金屡华. 2014—2023年金华市突发公共卫生事件特征[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 69-72.
[3] 王英杰, 孙高峰, 赵娥, 田原. 2017—2021年乌鲁木齐市2型糖尿病患者管理指标分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 92-95.
[4] 鲁琴宝, 吴昊澄, 吴晨, 傅天颖, 丁哲渊, 王心怡, 杨珂, 林君芬. 2023年浙江省突发公共卫生事件特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 487-490.
[5] 陈佩弟, 肖婷婷, 李新秀, 郑帅印, 黄芸. 2016—2023年乌鲁木齐市大气PM2.5污染分析及建立预测模型[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 510-513.
[6] 何晓庆, 罗进斌, 王小红, 许丹丹. 金华市大气污染物短期暴露对居民死亡和寿命损失年的影响[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 383-387.
[7] 赵薛飞, 王爱红, 史碧君, 谷少华, 张丹丹. 宁波市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 333-337.
[8] 朱澜澜, 张钟, 卞增惠, 许阳婷, 孙红敏, 刘婷. 2017—2022年南京市水痘突发公共卫生事件的空间聚集特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 215-218.
[9] 岑琼, 蒋旸, 降菁月, 李晓菲, 向文静, 吕韵云. 应用德尔菲法构建儿童家长口腔健康素养评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 193-197.
[10] 袁震, 沈先标, 季鹏, 严丽丽, 杨程. 宝山区大气污染物与儿科门诊量的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 143-146.
[11] 何晓庆, 罗进斌, 陈强, 许丹丹. 基于大气污染物与寿命损失年的金华市空气质量健康指数构建研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(12): 1017-1021.
[12] 张开月, 李小琴, 夏俊鹏, 戴翔宇, 巫晶晶, 蒋萌, 王芳, 陆盛华. 大气PM2.5暴露对居民超额死亡的风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(11): 950-952,957.
[13] 钞凤, 刘秉瑞, 付鹏钰, 张书芳, 李杉, 袁蒲. 河南省居民铅镉汞砷铝膳食暴露风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(11): 971-975,979.
[14] 董玉婷, 彭慧, 王小卉, 程仁杰, 王和兴. 嘉定区儿童膳食铅暴露健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 893-896.
[15] 宋韶芳, 张维蔚, 张玉华, 王燕燕, 曾锦衡, 潘心红. 广州市21种市售蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂膳食风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 781-785.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed