Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (11): 1139-1144    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.11.012
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
应用ddPCR检测甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒H275Y突变研究
楼秀玉, 颜浩, 孙逸, 王欣莹, 陈寅, 茅海燕
浙江省疾病预防控制中心微生物检验所,浙江 杭州 310051
Detection of H275Y mutation in influenza A H1N1 pdm09 virus by droplet digital PCR assay
LOU Xiuyu, YAN Hao, SUN Yi, WANG Xinying, CHEN Yin, MAO Haiyan
Department of Microbiology, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China
全文: PDF(1352 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价微滴式数字PCR(ddPCR)检测甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒神经氨酸酶(NA)H275Y突变的方法。方法 根据甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒NA片段包含275氨基酸位点的序列信息设计引物和双探针,优化ddPCR退火温度,建立甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒H275耐药敏感基因和H275Y耐药突变基因检测方法。采用检出限比较ddPCR和荧光定量PCR(qPCR)的灵敏度,通过检测甲型H1N1 pdm09、季节性H1N1、甲型H3N2流感病毒等14种呼吸道病毒样本比较ddPCR和qPCR的特异性。检测64份临床标本和5株流感病毒株,获得拷贝数,计算H275Y突变丰度,并将5株毒株的突变丰度与二代测序结果进行比较。结果 确定62.2 ℃为最优退火温度。采用ddPCR和qPCR检测甲型H1N1 pdm09 H275耐药敏感质粒和H275Y耐药突变质粒,ddPCR检出限分别为5.28(95%CI:4.28~7.45)和6.51(95%CI:5.25~9.37)拷贝/反应;qPCR检出限分别为5.70(95%CI:4.83~7.45)和7.06(95%CI:5.92~9.40)拷贝/反应。ddPCR和qPCR均能检出甲型H1N1 pdm09样本中的H275耐药敏感质粒和H275Y耐药突变质粒,其他11种呼吸道病毒均未检出,两种方法检测结果一致。64份临床标本中,ddPCR检出1例感染甲型H1N1 pdm09的重症肺炎患者的3份咽拭子标本存在H275Y突变,使用磷酸奥司他韦治疗第4天采集的标本突变丰度最高,为53.37%。ddPCR检测分离自该病例治疗第2、4、5天标本的流感病毒H275Y突变丰度分别为0.63%、88.93%和1.27%;二代测序检测治疗第4天标本的H275Y突变丰度为89.46%,未检测到治疗第2、5天标本存在H275Y突变。结论 ddPCR的灵敏度和特异性较qPCR高,对低频突变的检测灵敏度较二代测序高,可定量检测甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒NA片段H275Y突变。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
楼秀玉
颜浩
孙逸
王欣莹
陈寅
茅海燕
关键词 甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒H275Y突变微滴式数字PCR    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effectiveness of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for detection of neuraminidase (NA) H275Y mutations in influenza A H1N1 pdm09 virus. Methods The primers and dual probes were designed based on the sequence of the H1N1 pdm09 NA gene fragment which contained 275 amino acid sites, and the annealing temperature of ddPCR assay was optimized to establish a method for detection of H275 drug-sensitive genes and H275Y drug-resistant genes in H1N1 pdm09 virus. The sensitivity of ddPCR assay and fluorescent quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was compared using the detection limit, and the specificity of ddPCR and qPCR assays was compared for detection of 14 respiratory virus samples. In addition, 64 clinical samples and 5 influenza isolates were tested to calculate the abundance of H275Y mutations, and the mutation abundance of 5 influenza isolates was compared with next-generation sequencing results. Results The optimal annealing temperature was 62.2 ℃. The detection limits of ddPCR assay were 5.28 (95%CI: 4.28-7.45) copies/reaction for H1N1 pdm09 H275 drug-sensitive plasmids and 6.51 (95%CI: 5.25-9.37) copies/reaction for H1N1 pdm09 H275Y drug-resistant plasmids, and the detection limits of qPCR assay were 5.70 (95%CI: 4.83-7.45) copies/reaction for H1N1 pdm09 H275Y drug-sensitive plasmids and 7.06 (95%CI: 5.92-9.40) copies/reaction for H1N1 pdm09 H275Y drug-resistant plasmids. Both ddPCR and qPCR assays detected H275 and H275Y drug-resistant plasmids in H1N1 pdm09 viral samples but did not detect H275 and H275Y drug-resistant plasmids in other 11 respiratory virus samples, and these two assays showed consistent results. Of the 64 clinical samples, ddPCR assay detected H275Y mutation in three pharyngeal swab specimens from a severe pneumonia patients infected with H1N1 pdm09 virus, and the greatest mutation abundance was detected in samples collected on day 4 post-treatment with oseltamivir phosphate (53.37%). ddPCR assay detected 0.63, 88.93%% and 1.27% H275Y mutation abundance in samples collected on days 2, 4 and 5 post-treatment with oseltamivir phosphate, and next-generation sequencing detected 89.46% H275Y mutation abundance in samples collected on day 4 post-treatment with oseltamivir phosphate; however, no H275Y mutation was detected in samples collected on days 2 or 5 post-treatment with oseltamivir phosphate. Conclusions ddPCR presents a higher sensitivity and specificity than qPCR assay for detection of H275Y mutations in H1N1 pdm09 virus, and presents a higher sensitivity than next-generation sequencing for detection of low-frequency mutations, which is effective for quantitative detection of H275Y mutations in the NA fragment of the H1N1 pdm09 virus.
Key wordsinfluenza A H1N1 pdm09    influenza virus    H275Y mutation    droplet digital PCR
收稿日期: 2022-07-08      修回日期: 2022-09-16      出版日期: 2022-11-10
中图分类号:  R511.7  
基金资助:浙江省基础公益研究计划(LGF18H190003); 浙江省重点研发计划(2021C03044); 浙江省卫生领军人才培养项目[(2018)22]
通信作者: 茅海燕,E-mail:hymao@cdc.zj.cn   
作者简介: 楼秀玉,硕士,工程师,主要从事微生物检验工作
引用本文:   
楼秀玉, 颜浩, 孙逸, 王欣莹, 陈寅, 茅海燕. 应用ddPCR检测甲型H1N1 pdm09流感病毒H275Y突变研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1139-1144.
LOU Xiuyu, YAN Hao, SUN Yi, WANG Xinying, CHEN Yin, MAO Haiyan. Detection of H275Y mutation in influenza A H1N1 pdm09 virus by droplet digital PCR assay. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(11): 1139-1144.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.11.012      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I11/1139
[1] HUANG W J,CHENG Y H,LI X Y,et al.Neuraminidase inhibitor susceptibility profile of human influenza viruses during the 2016-2017 influenza season in Mainland China[J].J Infect Chemother,2018 ,24(9):729-733.
[2] CHAUDHRY A,BASTIEN N,LI Y,et al.Oseltamivir resistance in an influenza A(H3N2)virus isolated from an immunocompromised patient during the 2014-2015 influenza season in Alberta,Canada[J].Influenza Other Respir Viruses,2016,10(6):532-535.
[3] 包佳琪,王晓晨,邹迁达,等.流感病毒对神经氨酸酶抑制剂耐药性的研究进展[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2018,11(6):473-481.
BAO J Q,WANG X C,ZOU Q D,et al.Research progress on drug-resistance of influenza virus to neuraminidase inhibitors[J].Chin J Clin Infect Dis,2018,11(6):473-481.
[4] NGUYEN H T,ALICIA M F,GUBAREVA L V.Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance in influenza viruses and laboratory testing methods[J]. Antivir Ther,2012,17:159-173.
[5] 刘译利,高晶.数字聚合酶链反应在病原微生物检测中的应用进展[J].国际检验医学杂志,2020,41(21):2684-2688.
LIU Y L,GAO J.The application of digital polymerase chain reaction in pathogen detection[J].Int J Lab Med,2020,41(21):2684-2688.
[6] WHALE A S,BUSHELL C,GRANT P R,et al.Detection of rare drug resistance mutations by digital PCR in a human influenza a virus model system and clinical samples[J].J Clin Microbiol,2016,54(2):392-400.
[7] MITCHELL S L,CHANG Y C,FEEMSTER K,et al.Implementation of a rapid influenza A/B and RSV direct molecular assay improves emergency department oseltamivir use in paediatric patients[J].J Med Microbiol,2018,67(3):358-363.
[8] BOSMAN K J,NIJHUIS M,HAM P V,et al.Comparison of digital PCR platforms and semi-nested qPCR as a tool to determine the size of the HIV reservoir[J/OL].Sci Rep,2015,5[2022-09-16].http://doi.org/10.1038/srep13811.
[9] 韩冰,吴翠萍,赵芯,等.数字PCR和荧光定量PCR诊断急性期布鲁菌病的灵敏度比较初步研究[J].传染病信息,2019,32(4):312-316.
HAN B,WU C P,ZHAO X,et al.A preliminary study on the sensitivity of digital PCR and fluorescence quantitative PCR in the diagnosis of acute brucellosis[J].Infect Dis Inf,2019,32(4):312-316.
[10] JEANNOT E,BECETTE V,CAMPITELLI M,et al.Circulating human papillomavirus DNA detected using droplet digital PCR in the serum of patients diagnosed with early stage human papillomavirus-associated invasive carcinoma[J].J Pathol Clin Res,2016,28,(4):201-209.
[11] 孙婷婷,姜艳芳,宫平,等.应用数字PCR检测环境中微量新型冠状病毒残留[J].科学通报,2021,66(13):1653-1662.
SUN T T,JIANG Y F,GONG P,et al.Detection of microamounts of novel coronavirus residues in environment by digital PCR[J].Chin Sci Bull,2021,66(13):1653-1662.
[12] 王晓晨. H1N1 pdm09流感重症肺炎患者耐药位点筛查及H275Y突变与奥司他韦耐药相关性研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2020.
WANG X C.Screening of drug-resistant sites in patients with severe H1N1 pdm09 influenza pneumonia and research of the association between H275Y mutation ans oseltamivir-resistance [D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2020.
[1] 李萍萍, 罗丽, 吴一峰, 叶莉霞. 老年人接种三价流感病毒裂解疫苗的免疫原性评价[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 277-281.
[2] 刘卫光, 赵桂让, 黄道靖, 张智博, 孔振. 15岁以下严重急性呼吸道感染病例流感病毒检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(5): 516-518.
[3] 刘书珍, 孟丽, 席佩佩, 张勇朝, 范蓓, 李长贵, 夏胜利, 潘若文. 四价流感病毒裂解疫苗安全性和免疫原性评价[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1091-1095.
[4] 王小丽, 李锋, 韩同武, 王萌, 程真真, 李国伟. 郑州市流行性感冒监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(1): 52-56.
[5] 赵丹, 郝艳会. 辽阳市流行性感冒流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(9): 914-916,920.
[6] 杨洁, 刘栋楠, 许苗苗, 卫成, 武恕星, 武景福. 三门峡市流行性感冒病原学监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 813-815,819.
[7] 章显传, 王顺, 倪朝荣, 张晓铭. 一起学校乙型流行性感冒暴发疫情应急处置调查[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 375-377.
[8] 吴奇, 郑升龙, 李芳, 毛丽. 江山市城乡活禽市场禽流感病毒监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(1): 84-85,88.
[9] 涂智杰, 胡芹, 李光平. 乐平市活禽交易市场禽流感监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(9): 916-918.
[10] 万圣, 邵坚强, 杨涛, 於小丽. 三种禽流感病毒核酸检测试剂盒比较[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(11): 1184-1186.
[11] 裘锋平, 陈国强, 蒋颖颖, 李雪松. 柯桥区哨点医院流行性感冒病原学三年检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(9): 936-938.
[12] 蒋小仙, 李均, 罗琴, 金洁. 2 326例流感样病例流感病毒检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 63-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed