Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (7): 743-746    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.07.019
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
杭州市公共场所毛巾pH值调查结果
徐珊珊, 徐虹, 吕烨, 刘卫艳, 陈树昶
杭州市疾病预防控制中心健康危害因素监测所,浙江 杭州 310021
Investigation on pH value of towels in public places in Hangzhou City
XU Shanshan, XU Hong, LÜ Ye, LIU Weiyan, CHEN Shuchang
Institute of Health Risk Factors Monitoring, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China
全文: PDF(794 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 调查杭州市公共场所毛巾pH值,为加强公共场所毛巾卫生监督提供依据。方法 于2021年分别在杭州市13个县(市、区)随机抽取三星级及以上酒店、三星级以下酒店、快捷酒店、理发店和美容店各1家,按照投入使用总数的3%~5%随机抽取清洗消毒后准备使用的毛巾。采用《公共场所健康危害因素监测项目(2021年版)》场所基本情况调查表,收集场所类别和毛巾清洗消毒方式,按照GB/T 7573—2009《纺织品 水萃取液pH值的测定》检测毛巾pH值,依据GB 37488—2019《公共场所卫生指标及限值要求》,pH值为6.5~8.5为合格,分析不同场所和清洗消毒方式的毛巾pH值合格情况。结果 调查公共场所64家,检测毛巾807条,pH值MQR)为7.3(0.7),pH值合格655件,合格率为81.16%。三星级及以上酒店、三星级以下酒店、快捷酒店、理发店和美容店毛巾pH值合格率分别为84.95%、75.56%、73.21%、85.61%和88.81%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.307,P=0.001)。自行清洗消毒毛巾pH值合格率为88.28%,高于外送清洗消毒毛巾的77.18%(χ2=14.973,P<0.001)。三星级及以上酒店外送清洗消毒毛巾pH值合格率较高,为83.82%;三星级以下酒店和美容店自行清洗消毒毛巾pH值合格率较高,均为100.00%。结论 杭州市公共场所毛巾清洗质量有待提高,建议加强对公共场所毛巾的卫生监督。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 毛巾pH公共场所    
AbstractObjective To investigate the pH value of towels in public places in Hangzhou City, so as to provide the evidence for improving health supervision of towels in public places. Methods One three- and higher-star hotel, one less than three-star hotel, one express hotel, one barber shop and one beauty shop were selected from 13 counties (districts) of Hangzhou City in 2021, and 3% to 5% of all cleaned and disinfected towels that planned to be used were randomly sampled. The type of public places and towels cleaning and disinfection were collected using the basic investigation form provided in the Public Place Health Risk Factors Surveillance Program (2021 version), and the pH value of towels was measured according to the national criteria Textiles-determination of pH of aqueous extract (GB/T 7573-2009). According to the national criteria of Hygienic indicators and limits for public places (GB 37488-2019), a pH value of 6.5 to 8.5 was defined qualified, and the rates of qualified pH values was estimated for towels sampled from different places and with different cleaning and disinfection types. Results Totally 64 public places were investigated, and 807 towels were measured for pH values, with a median pH value of 7.3 (interquartile range, 0.7). A total of 655 towels had qualified pH values (81.16%). The rates of qualified pH values were 84.95%, 75.56%, 73.21%, 85.61% and 88.81% for towels sampled from the three- and higher-star hotel, less than three-star hotel, express hotel, barber shop and beauty shop, respectively (χ2=19.307, P=0.001). The rate of qualified pH values for self-cleaned and -disinfected towels was significantly higher than for towels with outsourcing cleaning and disinfection services (88.28% vs. 77.18%; χ2=14.973, P<0.001). The rate of qualified pH values was 83.82% for towels with outsourcing cleaning and disinfection services sampled from the three- and higher-star hotel, and was both 100.00% for self-cleaned and -disinfected towels sampled from the less than three-star hotel and beauty shop. Conclusion The cleaning quality of towels remains to be improved in public places in Hangzhou City, and health supervisions on towels are recommended to be improved in public places.
Key wordstowel    pH    public place
收稿日期: 2022-03-03      修回日期: 2022-04-16      出版日期: 2022-07-10
中图分类号:  R195  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2020ZH027); 浙江省科技计划项目软科学研究计划(2020C35036)
通信作者: 徐珊珊,E-mail:151697330@qq.com   
作者简介: 徐珊珊,博士,主管医师,主要从事环境卫生相关工作
引用本文:   
徐珊珊, 徐虹, 吕烨, 刘卫艳, 陈树昶. 杭州市公共场所毛巾pH值调查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 743-746.
XU Shanshan, XU Hong, LÜ Ye, LIU Weiyan, CHEN Shuchang. Investigation on pH value of towels in public places in Hangzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(7): 743-746.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.07.019      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I7/743
[1] 李莉,葛覃兮,刘航,等.全国585家旅店毛巾和床单pH值现状及影响因素分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2018,35(8):698-701.
LI L,GE T X,LIU H,et al.Analysis on pH value and influencing factors for public sharing textiles in 585 hotels in China[J].J Environ Health,2018,35(8):698-701.
[2] 季志坚. 上海毛巾产品质量总体良好——2019年上海市毛巾产品质量监督抽查公告解读[J].上海质量,2020(2):77-78.
JI Z J.The overall quality of towel products in Shanghai is good-interpretation of the announcement on quality supervision and random inspection of towel products in Shanghai in2019[J].Shanghai Qual,2020(2):77-78.
[3] 方道奎,周国宏,余淑苑,等.深圳市住宿场所布草卫生状况调查及pH值检测结果分析[J].社区医学杂志,2019,17(15):896-899.
FANG D K,ZHOU G H,YU S Y,et al.Investigation on sanitary condition of cloth and analysis of pH value test results in accommodation places in Shenzhen[J].J Community Med,2019,17(15):896-899.
[4] 国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.公共场所卫生指标及限值要求:GB 37488—2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
State Administraion for Market Regulation,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Hygienic indicators and limits for public places:GB 37488-2019[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2019.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.公共场所卫生检验方法第6部分:卫生监测技术规范:GB/T 18204.6—2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Examination methods for public place-part 6:technical specifications of health monitoring:GB/T 18204.6-2013[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2014.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.纺织品水萃取液pH值的测定:GB/T 7573—2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Textiles-determination of pH of aqueous extract:GB/T 7573-2009[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2009.
[7] 郭廉双. 解析纺织品经洗涤后pH值超标问题[J].中国纤检,2011,16:47.
GUO L S.Analysis on the problem of excessive pH value of textiles after washing[J].China Fiber Inspection,2011,16:47.
[8] 陈先荣. 浅析游轮布草质量问题及原因[J].中国纤检,2016,9:49.
CHEN X R.A simple analysis of the problems of linen quality used on cruises and its causes[J].China Fiber Inspection,2016,9:49.
[9] 岳霄. 宾馆、酒店布草洗涤专用酸剂的技术进展[J].中国洗涤用品工业,2021(1):45-49.
YUE X.Technical progress of special neutralizing sour for hotel linen washing[J].China Clean Ind,2021(1):45-49.
[10] 叶绍燕,冯看,冯莲,等.柳州市宾馆(酒店)公共用品pH值的检测结果[J].职业与健康,2019,35(24):3420-3423.
YE S Y,FENG K,FENG L,et al.Detection results of pH value of public goods in Liuzhou hotel[J].Occup Health,2019,35(24):3420-3423.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.生态纺织品技术要求:GB/T 18885—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China.Technical specification for ecological textiles:GB/T 18885-2002[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2003.
[12] 张芸. 纺织产品常见质量问题分析[J].印染,2012(5):33-36.
ZHANG Y.Analysis on quality problems of textile products[J].Dyeing Finish,2012(5):33-36.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.国家纺织产品基本安全技术规范:GB 18401—2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine,Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.National general safety technical code for textile products:GB 18401-2010[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2011.
[14] 中华人民共和国商务部.衣物洗涤质量要求:SB/T 10989—2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China.Clothing washing quality requirements:SB/T 10989-2013[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2013.
[15] 刘雪莹,陈海平,孟田,等.2019年北京市海淀区部分住宿类公共场所健康危害因素调查[J].职业与健康,2021,37(6):824-827.
LIU X Y,CHEN H P,MENG T,et al.Investigation on health hazard factors of some accommodation public places in Haidian District of Beijing in 2019[J].Occup Health,2021,37(6):824-827.
[16] 闫岩. 安阳市宾馆(酒店)健康危害因素分析[J].健康教育与健康促进,2020,15(4):428-430.
YAN Y.Analysis of health hazard factors of guesthouses (hotels) in Anyang City[J].Health Educ Health Promot,2020,15(4):428-430.
[17] 甘俊英,魏昊,邱光文,等.马鞍山市2019年主城区公共场所健康危害因素监测结果分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2021,27(5):355-358.
GAN J Y,WEI H,QIU G W,et al.Analysis on the monitoring results of health hazard factors in public places in the main urban area of Ma'anshan City in 2019[J].Anhui J Prev Med,2021,27(5):355-358.
[1] 方子思, 廖辉, 周筱丛, 徐虹. 我国公共场所集中空调通风系统嗜肺军团菌污染的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 425-430.
[2] 郑子聪, 俞锋, 王子艺, 王勐, 徐越, 吕巧红. 杭州市公共场所无烟环境建设暗访调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 355-358.
[3] 文彩荷, 俞黎铭, 柴芸. 重度窒息新生儿55例预后分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 899-902.
[4] 翟和亮, 陈栋, 罗慧敏, 李玉. 六安市宾馆健康危害因素评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 940-943.
[5] 陈卫中, 陈志健, 何升良, 徐沛维, 陈媛, 伍立志. 浙江省公共场所集中空调通风系统卫生状况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(10): 1048-1050.
[6] 陈卫中,陈志健,何升良,徐沛维,陈媛,伍立志. 浙江省公共场所集中空调通风系统污染监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(4): 402-404.
[7] 赵世苗, 秦国兴, 陈军良, 甘建光. 基于评估的治疗管理模式对抑郁症患者的疗效研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(5): 469-472.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed