Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (8): 799-803    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.08.009
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况分析
严青秀1, 王炜2, 郝晓刚2, 高宇2, 方春福2, 张幸2, 刘文峰3
1.浙江中医药大学公共卫生学院,浙江 杭州 310051;
2.衢州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 衢州 324000;
3.常山县疾病预防控制中心,浙江 常山 324200
Unregistered treatment situation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Quzhou City from 2017 to 2023
YAN Qingxiu1, WANG Wei2, HAO Xiaogang2, GAO Yu2, FANG Chunfu2, ZHANG Xing2, LIU Wenfeng3
1. School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China;
2. Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang 324000, China;
3. Changshan County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changshan, Zhejiang 324200, China
全文: PDF(847 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析2017—2023年浙江省衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况及影响因素,为促进肺结核患者管理、优化疾病防控策略提供依据。方法 通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统传染病报告监测系统和结核病管理信息系统收集2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者资料,包括人口学信息、病原学结果和死亡情况等;以结核病管理信息系统中未匹配到的肺结核患者为未收治肺结核患者,分析未收治率,采用多因素logistic回归模型分析肺结核患者未收治的影响因素。结果 2017—2023年衢州市共报告肺结核患者10 779例,其中男性7 700例,占71.44%;女性3 079例,占28.56%。<65岁5 484例,占50.88%。未收治肺结核患者630例,未收治率为5.84%(95%CI:5.42%~6.38%)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,≥65岁肺结核患者未收治风险高于<65岁患者(OR=1.829,95%CI:1.512~2.212);外地户籍肺结核患者未收治风险高于本地患者(OR=5.710,95%CI:4.724~6.901);家务及待业(OR=2.001,95%CI:1.421~2.818)和其他职业(OR=2.396,95%CI:1.789~3.137)肺结核患者未收治风险高于农民患者。未收治肺结核患者死亡率为26.67%,高于收治患者的5.02%,死亡风险高于收治患者(OR=7.147,95%CI:5.738~8.902)。结论 2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治率控制较好,但老年人、外地户籍、家务及待业患者未收治风险较高。建议完善医疗和社会保障政策,加强肺结核防治知识健康教育,提高治疗依从性,降低死亡风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
严青秀
王炜
郝晓刚
高宇
方春福
张幸
刘文峰
关键词 肺结核未收治率影响因素    
AbstractObjective To analyze the unregistered treatment situation and its influencing factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province from 2017 to 2023, so as to provide a basis for promoting the management of tuberculosis patients and optimizing disease prevention and control strategies. Methods Data of pulmonary tuberculosis patients including demographic information, etiological results, and mortality status were collected through the China Disease Prevention and Control Information System Infectious Disease Reporting and Surveillance System and the Tuberculosis Management Information System. Pulmonary tuberculosis patients not matched in the Tuberculosis Management Information System were defined as unregistered treatment patients, and the unregistered treatment rate was analyzed. Factors affecting unregistered treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis patients were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 10 779 pulmonary tuberculosis patients were reported in Quzhou City from 2017 to 2023, including 7 700 males (71.44%) and 3 079 females (28.56%). There were 5 484 cases aged <65 years, accounting for 50.88%. Among them, 630 cases were unregistered treatment, with an unregistered treatment rate of 5.84% (95%CI: 5.42%-6.38%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed pulmonary tuberculosis patients aged ≥65 years (OR=1.829, 95%CI: 1.512-2.212) had a higher risk of being unregistered treatment than those aged <65 years; patients with non-local household registration (OR=5.710, 95%CI: 4.724-6.901) had a higher risk than local patients; and patients engaged in housework/unemployed (OR=2.001, 95%CI: 1.421-2.818) or other occupations (OR=2.396, 95%CI: 1.789-3.137) had a higher risk than farmers. The mortality of unregistered treatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients was higher than the registered treatment patients (26.67% vs. 5.02%),with a significantly elevated mortality risk (OR=7.147, 95%CI: 5.738-8.902). Conclusions The unregistered treatment rate among pulmonary tuberculosis patients was well controlled in Quzhou City from 2017 to 2023, but the elderly, patients with non-local household registration, and those engaged in housework/unemployed had a higher risk of unregistered treatment. It is recommended to improve medical and social security policies, strengthen health education on tuberculosis prevention, enhance treatment adherence, and reduce mortality risk.
Key wordspulmonary tuberculosis    unregistered treatment rate    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2025-05-21      修回日期: 2025-07-21      出版日期: 2025-08-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:浙江省基层卫生软科学项目(2023ZD16); 常山县科技研发和成果转换计划项目(2022C029); 衢州市科技局指导性科技攻关项目(2024ZD085)
作者简介: 严青秀,硕士研究生在读,公共卫生专业
通信作者: 方春福,E-mail:ajkqzcdc@126.com   
引用本文:   
严青秀, 王炜, 郝晓刚, 高宇, 方春福, 张幸, 刘文峰. 2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 799-803.
YAN Qingxiu, WANG Wei, HAO Xiaogang, GAO Yu, FANG Chunfu, ZHANG Xing, LIU Wenfeng. Unregistered treatment situation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Quzhou City from 2017 to 2023. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(8): 799-803.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.08.009      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I8/799
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2024[R].Geneva:WHO,2024.
[2] 成君,赵雁林.创建无结核社区终止结核病流行[J].中国防痨杂志,2021,43(11):1120-1124.
CHENG J,ZHAO Y L.End tuberculosis epidemic by establishing zero tuberculosis community[J].Chin J Antituberc,2021,43(11):1120-1124.(in Chinese)
[3] DOOKIE N,RAMBARAN S,PADAYATCHI N,et al.Evolution of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis:a review on the molecular determinants of resistance and implications for personalized care[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2018,73(5):1138-1151.
[4] COLEMAN M,MARTINEZ L,THERON G,et al.Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in high-incidence settings-new paradigms and insights[J].Pathogens,2022,11(11):1-20.
[5] 吴倩,张钰,刘魁,等.2016—2020年浙江省肺结核流行特征分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(5):487-491.
WU Q,ZHANG Y,LIU K,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in Zhejiang Province from 2016 to 2020[J].China Prev Med J,2022,34(5):487-491.(in Chinese)
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断:WS 288—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.Diagnosis for pulmonary tuberculosis:WS 288—2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2018.(in Chinese)
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.结核病分类:WS 196—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.Classification of tuberculosi:WS 196—2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2018.(in Chinese)
[8] 葛锐,田敏,侯志刚,等.2013—2022年嘉兴市儿童青少年肺结核发现延迟分析[J].预防医学,2023,35(12):1089-1092.
GE R,TIAN M,HOU Z G,et al.Delay in identification of pulmonary tuberculosis among children and adolescents in Jiaxing City from 2013 to 2022[J].China Prev Med J,2023,35(12):1089-1092.(in Chinese)
[9] 梁瑞英,梁桂烨,张爱洁,等.2018—2020年北京市朝阳区肺结核患者未收治情况及相关因素分析[J].首都公共卫生,2022,16(3):142-146.
LIANG R Y,LIANG G Y,ZHANG A J,et al.Analysis of untreated pulmonary tuberculosis patients and related factors in Chaoyang district of Beijing,2018-2020[J].Capital J Public Health,2022,16(3):142-146.(in Chinese)
[10] 赵倩颖,王慧,李锦成,等.2013—2022年扬州市老年人群肺结核流行特征[J].预防医学,2025,37(3):276-279.
ZHAO Q Y,WANG H,LI J C,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis among the elderly in Yangzhou City from 2013 to 2022[J].China Prev Med J,2025,37(3):276-279.(in Chinese)
[11] WOLFE M K,MCDONALD N C,HOLMES G M.Transportation barriers to health care in the United States:findings from the national health interview survey,1997-2017[J].Am J Public Health,2020,110(6):815-822.
[12] 郝晓刚,王炜,张幸.衢州市肺结核流行特征与老年患者诊疗状况分析[J].预防医学,2018,30(4):391-392.
HAO X G,WANG W,ZHANG X.Analysis of epidemic characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis and diagnosis and treatment of elderly patients in Quzhou City[J].China Prev Med J,2018,30(4):391-392.(in Chinese)
[13] 倪妮,黄飞,王倪,等.2016—2020年全国流动人口肺结核流行特征分析[J].疾病监测,2023,38(7):819-824.
NI N,HUANG F,WANG N,et al.Epidemic characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in migrants in China,2016-2020[J].Dis Surveill,2023,38(7):819-824.(in Chinese)
[14] 徐彩玲. 不同阶段的肺结核患者治疗依从性及影响因素的调查研究[D].天津:天津医科大学,2016.
XU C L.Investigation and study on treatment compliance and influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patients at different stages[D].Tianjin:Tianjin Medical University,2016.(in Chinese)
[15] 胡冬梅,徐彩红,赵雁林.2018—2021年全国流动人口肺结核流行特征分析[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2023,21(2):78-81,107.
HU D M,XU C H,ZHAO Y L.Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis among floating population in China from 2018 to 2021[J].J Trop Dis Parasitol,2023,21(2):78-81,107.(in Chinese)
[16] 王黎霞,成诗明,陈明亭,等.2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告[J].中国防痨杂志,2012,34(8):485-508.
WANG L X,CHENG S M,CHEN M T,et al.The fifth national tuberculosis epidemiological survey in 2010[J].Chin J Antituberc,2012,34(8):485-508.(in Chinese)
[17] 夏加英,羊红儿.杭州市富阳区老年结核病患者结核病知识知晓情况及其影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2021,37(3):402-405.
XIA J Y,YANG H E.Awareness of tuberculosis knowledge and its influencing factors among elderly tuberculosis patients in Fuyang District,Hangzhou City[J].Chin J Public Health Manag,2021,37(3):402-405.(in Chinese)
[1] 翟羽佳, 章涛, 古雪, 徐乐, 吴梦娜, 林君芬, 吴晨. 社区老年人认知衰弱现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 762-766,772.
[2] 苏德华, 陈向阳, 李君, 赵丽娜, 张鹤美, 朱婷婷, 胡文雪, 赖江宜. 温州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗及时性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 804-808.
[3] 王晓宇, 张志平, 董玉颖, 梁杰, 陈强. 老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 809-813.
[4] 王海琪, 张涵潇, 杨凤云, 国献丽, 范生荣, 张丽锋, 蒋泓. 嘉定区中学生抑郁情绪调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 832-836.
[5] 成灵灵, 阎亚琼, 白增华, 张晓刚, 郝丽婷, 杨慧莹. 先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿年龄别体质指数Z评分变化轨迹及影响因素[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 858-863.
[6] 王立新, 王浩, 何青芳, 方雨葭, 张洁, 杜晓甫. 浙江省居民限盐勺使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 668-672.
[7] 林飞云, 周敏聪, 陈晓雯. 高龄经产妇产后抑郁症状及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 732-736.
[8] 陈强, 郭震, 朱玮, 何晓庆, 朱斌斌. 金华市重点人群职业健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 747-750,756.
[9] 何欢, 赵雪, 蔡鹏, 詹小亚, 马蕾. 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者运动恐惧的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 659-663.
[10] 汪小梅, 郑杉, 翁晓飞. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者二元应对水平的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 664-667,672.
[11] 杨雨欣, 邵银燕, 李艳娟. 中医养生保健素养及影响因素研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 577-582.
[12] 李美琳, 周梦姣, 吴佳芸, 喻喆, 孔利萍. 老年男性2型糖尿病患者合并肌少症的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 588-592.
[13] 梁茵茵, 袁瑞, 刘光涛, 李辉, 付云. 湖州市中学生抑郁症状现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 622-627,631.
[14] 俞丹丹, 杨加丽, 张雅萍, 许慧琳, 何丹丹, 李俊. 2型糖尿病共病患者空腹血糖波动轨迹的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 562-567,572.
[15] 白茂潮, 李芬, 地力努尔·吐尔逊, 热米拉·热扎克, 王岩. HPV感染女性焦虑症状的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 573-577,582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed