Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (5): 384-387,409    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
新生儿出生体重与母亲2型糖尿病关联的双向孟德尔随机化研究
沈放如, 杨可, 刘厚璞, 朱家豪, 李迎君
杭州医学院公共卫生学院,浙江 杭州 311399
Association between neonatal birth weight and maternal type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
SHEN Fangru, YANG Ke, LIU Houpu, ZHU Jiahao, LI Yingjun
School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311399, China
全文: PDF(1327 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨新生儿出生体重与母亲2型糖尿病(T2DM)的关联,为早期预防孕产妇T2DM、改善母婴健康提供参考。方法 通过与新生儿出生体重、母亲T2DM相关的2项全基因组关联研究(GWAS)收集单核苷酸多态性位点(SNP)资料;采用逆方差加权法,以出生体重相关的26个SNP为工具变量,母亲T2DM为研究结局进行正向孟德尔随机化(MR)分析;以母亲T2DM相关的18个SNP作为工具变量,以新生儿出生体重的母体效应作为研究结局进行反向MR分析。采用Cochran Q检验异质性,采用MR-Egger回归法检验多效性,采用留一法检验结果的稳健性。结果 Q检验显示存在异质性(P=0.019、0.038),均采用随机效应模型。MR分析结果显示,新生儿出生体重每增加1个标准差(≈488 g),母亲发生T2DM风险下降29.9%(OR=0.701,95%CI:0.547~0.899);母亲患T2DM可导致新生儿出生体重增加0.074个标准差(OR=1.074,95%CI:1.043~1.106)。未发现工具变量的水平多效性(P=0.241、0.188)。逐个剔除SNP后,MR分析结果稳健。结论 新生儿出生体重与母亲T2DM发生风险之间存在双向关联。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
沈放如
杨可
刘厚璞
朱家豪
李迎君
关键词 出生体重2型糖尿病孟德尔随机化    
AbstractObjective To examine the association between neonatal birth weight and maternal type 2 diabetes (T2DM), so as to provide insights into the formulation of the early T2DM prevention and improvements of maternal and children health. Methods Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were collected from two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that examined the association between neonatal birth weight and maternal T2DM. Inverse variance weighted method was employed for forward Mendelian randomization with 26 birth weight-associated SNPs as instrumental variables and maternal T2DM as the study outcome and for reverse Mendelian randomization with 18 maternal T2DM-associated SNPs as instrumental variables and maternal effects of neonatal birth weight as the study outcome. The heterogeneity was examined using Cochran's Q test, and the pleiotropy was evaluated using MR-Egger regression, while the robustness of the results was evaluated using leave-one-out test. Results Cochran's Q test detected heterogeneity across two studies (P=0.019, 0.038), and random effect models were employed. Mendelian randomization showed that an increase in neonatal birth weight by per standard error (approximately 488 g) resulted a 29.9% reduction in the risk of maternal T2DM (OR=0.701, 95%CI: 0.547-0.899), and maternal T2DM increased the neonatal birth weight by 0.074 standard errors (OR=1.074, 95%CI: 1.043-1.106). No horizontal pleiotropy was seen for instrumental variables (P=0.241, 0.188). With each SNP excluded in turn, the results of Mendelian randomization study were robust. Conclusion There are bidirectional associations between neonatal birth weight and risk of maternal T2DM.
Key wordsbirth weight    type 2 diabetes mellitus    Mendelian randomization
收稿日期: 2023-01-13      修回日期: 2023-03-31      出版日期: 2023-05-10
中图分类号:  R587.1  
基金资助:国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202113023001)
通信作者: 李迎君,E-mail:2016034036@hmc.edu.cn   
作者简介: 沈放如,本科在读
引用本文:   
沈放如, 杨可, 刘厚璞, 朱家豪, 李迎君. 新生儿出生体重与母亲2型糖尿病关联的双向孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 384-387,409.
SHEN Fangru, YANG Ke, LIU Houpu, ZHU Jiahao, LI Yingjun. Association between neonatal birth weight and maternal type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 384-387,409.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.004      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I5/384
[1] SARAVANAN P.Gestational diabetes:opportunities for improving maternal and child health[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endo,2020,8(9):793-800.
[2] METZGER B E,LOWE L P,DYER A R,et al.Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med,2008,358(19):1991-2002.
[3] NAVER K V,SECHER N J,OVESEN P G,et al.Offspring preterm birth and birth size are related to long-term risk of maternal diabetes[J]. Eur J Epidemiol,2013,28(5):427-432.
[4] NHAM T,READ S H,GIANNAKEAS V,et al.The association between offspring birthweight and future risk of maternal diabetes:a population-based study [J/OL]. Diabetic Med,2022,40(2)[2023-03-31] . https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14991.
[5] STRØM-ROUM E M,JUKIC A M,ESKILD A.Offspring birthweight and placental weight-does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies[J]. Acta Obstet Gyn Scan,2021,100(10):1885-1892.
[6] TYRRELL J S,YAGHOOTKAR H,FREATHY R M,et al.Parental diabetes and birthweight in 236 030 individuals in the UK biobank study[J].Int J Epidemiol,2013,42(6):1714-1723.
[7] CHIA A R,CHEN L W,LAI J S,et al.Maternal dietary patterns and birth outcomes:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Adv Nutr,2019,10(4):685-695.
[8] CARNEGIE R,ZHENG J,SALLIS H M,et al.Mendelian randomisation for nutritional psychiatry[J].Lancet Psychiat, 2020,7(2):208-216.
[9] WARRINGTON N M,BEAUMONT R N,HORIKOSHI M,et al.Maternal and fetal genetic effects on birth weight and their relevance to cardio-metabolic risk factors[J].Nat Genet,2019,51(5):804-814.
[10] MAHAJAN A,TALIUN D,THURNER M,et al.Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps[J].Nat Genet,2018,50(11):1505-1513.
[11] EVANS D M,SMITH D G.Mendelian randomization:new applications in the coming age of hypothesis-free causality[J].Annu Rev Genom Hum G,2015,16:327-350.
[12] BURGESS S,THOMPSON S G.Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method[J]. Eur J Epidemiol,2017,32(5):377-389.
[13] BOWDEN J,SMITH D G,HAYCOCK P C,et al.Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator[J].Genet Epidemiol,2016,40(4):304-314.
[14] ZENG P,ZHOU X.Causal association between birth weight and adult diseases:evidence from a Mendelian randomization analysis [J/OL]. Front Genet,2019,10[2023-03-31] .https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00618.
[15] JAMES-TODD T M,KARUMANCHI S A,HIBERT E L,et al. Gestational age,infant birth weight, and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes in mothers:Nurses' Health StudyⅡ[J/OL]. Prev Chronic Dis,2013,10[2023-03-31] .http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120336.
[16] EVANS D M,MOEN G H,HWANG L D,et al.Elucidating the role of maternal environmental exposures on offspring health and disease using two-sample Mendelian randomization[J].Int J Epidemiol,2019,48(3):861-875.
[17] CHEN J,BACELIS J,SOLE-NAVAIS P,et al.Dissecting maternal and fetal genetic effects underlying the associations between maternal phenotypes,birth outcomes,and adult phenotypes:a mendelian-randomization and haplotype-based genetic score analysis in 10 734 mother-infant pairs [J/OL]. PLoS One,2020,17(8)[2023-03-31] .https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003305.
[18] LI J H,SZCZERBINSKI L,DAWED A Y,et al.A polygenic score for type 2 diabetes risk is associated with both the acute and sustained response to sulfonylureas[J].Diabetes,2021,70(1):293-300.
[19] BEAUMONT R N,WARRINGTON N M,CAVADINO A,et al.Genome-wide association study of offspring birth weight in 86 577 women identifies five novel loci and highlights maternal genetic effects that are independent of fetal genetics[J]. Hum Mol genet,2018,27(4):742-756.
[1] 柏旭, 苏洁, 李凤, 徐倩, 沈源, 肖凌凤. 我国成人糖尿病视网膜病变影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 595-601.
[2] 刘国志, 袁空军, 庄蔚, 周光清. 国内外城市社区2型糖尿病健康管理模式比较[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 262-266.
[3] 杨红, 刘溦, 骆沛洋, 宋杰, 蒋雨晴, 何志兴, 叶丁, 毛盈颖. 吸烟与强直性脊柱炎关联的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 1-5.
[4] 汤洋, 李琳, 廖兴, 林坚. 2型糖尿病患者体感运动联合神经肌肉穴位电刺激干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 794-798.
[5] 孙霞, 朱艳, 郑鹏, 徐爱花, 董海娜. 超重肥胖和2型糖尿病对瘦素、内脂素的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 581-585.
[6] 何雅薇, 葛华英, 李修英, 叶赵芳, 孔利萍. 中青年2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 258-262.
[7] 周晓燕, 胡如英, 何青芳, 潘劲, 龚巍巍, 陆凤, 王蒙, 钟节鸣. 浙江省农村2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白控制水平及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 123-128.
[8] 苏银霞, 卢耀勤, 田翔华, 李莉, 姚华. 基于常规体检指标的2型糖尿病风险预测研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(12): 1230-1234.
[9] 贾庆梅, 张丽, 喻喆, 陈为霞, 孔利萍. 青年2型糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦水平及其影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 808-811.
[10] 杨晓迪, 李曾荣, 刘素贞. 中青年2型糖尿病患者心理弹性的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 665-669.
[11] 李文丽, 苏银霞, 诸葛瑾慧, 王育珊, 王淑霞, 姚华. 新源县哈萨克族人群主要慢性病的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 398-403.
[12] 潘冬梅, 王佳蓓, 郭庆, 李静静. 老年2型糖尿病患者合并骨质疏松症的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 382-384,387.
[13] 唐英琪, 李英, 田坚. 2型糖尿病患者合并非酒精性脂肪性肝病的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 292-294.
[14] 鹿伟, 夏勇, 张世鑫, 宋燕华, 蔡德雷, 徐彩菊, 赵李丽. 5-HMF对早期2型糖尿病合并肝损伤小鼠糖脂代谢和肝功能影响的研究[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1109-1112.
[15] 李珊珊, 赵钰岚. 胰岛素抵抗及高胰岛素血症促进胰腺癌发生的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1122-1125,1129.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed