Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (5): 447-451    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.05.004
  结核病主动发现与预防性干预专题 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测技术与诊断的研究进展
陈国智1 综述, 赵丽娜2 审校
1.乐清市疾病预防控制中心(乐清市卫生监督所),浙江 乐清 325600;
2.温州市疾病预防控制中心(温州市卫生监督所),浙江 温州 325000
Research progress on the detection techniques and diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection
CHEN Guozhi1, ZHAO Lina2
1. Yueqing Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Yueqing Institute of Public Health Supervision), Yueqing, Zhejiang 325600, China;
2. Wenzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Wenzhou Institute of Public Health Supervision), Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
全文: PDF(829 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(LTBI)是感染结核分枝杆菌后的特殊免疫状态,影响全球约1/4的人口,构成了85%~90%的活动性结核病病例。目前,LTBI常用的检测方法是结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA),然而均存在一定局限性,LTBI诊断标准尚不统一。随着分子生物技术和人工智能技术的发展,RNA测序、蛋白质组学和机器学习等为LTBI诊断提供了新方向。RNA测序和蛋白质组学能够揭示LTBI状态下基因与蛋白表达的复杂性和多样性,通过识别特异性标志物提升诊断准确性;机器学习可通过算法训练诊断模型,为LTBI检测提供快速诊断和个性化决策支持。本文综述了LTBI的诊断现状、检测新方法和机器学习在LTBI辅助诊断中的应用,为LTBI的诊断提供理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈国智
赵丽娜
关键词 结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测技术诊断方法机器学习    
Abstract:Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) refers to a specific immune state after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, affecting approximately one quarter of the global population and contributing to 85%-90% of active pulmonary tuberculosis cases. At present, the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assay are the main detection methods for LTBI, yet both have certain limitations, and there is no unified standard for LTBI diagnosis. With the rapid advancement of molecular biotechnology and artificial intelligence, technologies such as RNA sequencing, proteomics and machine learning have opened up new perspectives for LTBI diagnosis. RNA sequencing and proteomics can reveal the complexity and diversity of gene and protein expression profiles under LTBI status, and improve diagnostic accuracy by identifying specific biomarkers. Machine learning can establish diagnostic models through algorithm training, so as to provide rapid diagnosis and personalized decision support for LTBI screening. This paper reviews the current diagnostic situation, novel detection techniques of LTBI and the application of machine learning in auxiliary diagnosis of LTBI, aiming to provide theoretical references for the diagnosis of LTBI.
Key wordslatent tuberculosis infection    detection techniques    diagnostic methods    machine learning
收稿日期: 2026-01-20      修回日期: 2026-04-25     
中图分类号:  R52  
基金资助:浙江省疾病预防控制科技计划项目(2026JKZ066); 温州市基础性科研项目(Y20240884)
作者简介: 陈国智,本科,副主任医师,主要从事传染性疾病控制工作
通信作者: 赵丽娜,E-mail:landy816@qq.com   
引用本文:   
陈国智, 赵丽娜. 结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测技术与诊断的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 447-451.
CHEN Guozhi, ZHAO Lina. Research progress on the detection techniques and diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(5): 447-451.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.05.004      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I5/447
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis reports,1997 to 2025[EB/OL].[2026-04-25].https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports.
[2] 王歆尧,姜美丽,庞元捷,等.中国结核病疾病负担现状[J].中华流行病学杂志,2024,45(6):857-864.
[3] ZHANG H Y,GUAN W W,ZHOU J K.Advances in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection[J].Infect Drug Resist,2025,18:483-493.
[4] 邱曼玲,江毅,李梦映,等.在校学生结核潜伏感染及预防性治疗研究进展[J].预防医学,2024,36(1):30-33.
[5] 张铭锦,刘绘影,高嘉,等.结核潜伏感染的诊断现状与展望[J].中华传染病杂志,2024,42(8):500-505.
[6] 姜雯雯,徐勇胜.结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查方法研究进展[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2023,38(12):948-952.
[7] TAYLOR Z,NOLAN C M,BLUMBERG H M,et al.Controlling tuberculosis in the United States.Recommendations from the American thoracic society,CDC,and the infectious diseases society of America[J].MMWR Recomm Rep,2005,54(12):1-81.
[8] CARRANZA C,PEDRAZA-SANCHEZ S,DE OYARZABAL-MENDEZ E,et al.Diagnosis for latent tuberculosis infection:new alternatives[J/OL].Front Immunol,2020,11[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02006.
[9] 张爽,赵弘,杨美霞.结核潜伏感染检测方法的研究进展[J].上海预防医学,2025,37(1):94-99.
[10] DING Y E,WONG M T J,NORAZMI M N,et al.Advancement in diagnostic approaches for latent tuberculosis:distinguishing recent from remote infections[J/OL].One Health Outlook,2025,7(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-025-00144-w.
[11] HAAS M K,BELKNAP R W.Diagnostic tests for latent tuberculosis infection[J].Clin Chest Med,2019,40(4):829-837.
[12] CODECASA L,MANTEGANI P,GALLI L,et al.An in-house RD1-based enzyme-linked immunospot-gamma interferon assay instead of the tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J].J Clin Microbiol,2006,44(6):1944-1950.
[13] AHMED A,FENG P I,GAENSBAUER J T,et al.Interferon-γ release assays in children <15 years of age[J/OL].Pediatrics,2020,145(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1930.
[14] PARK C H,PARK J H,JUNG Y S.Impact of immunosuppressive therapy on the performance of latent tuberculosis screening tests in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL].J Pers Med,2022,12(3):[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030507.
[15] GONG W P,WU X Q.Differential diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis:a key to a successful tuberculosis control strategy[J/OL].Front Microbiol,2021,12[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.745592.
[16] STARSHINOVA A,DOVGALYK I,MALKOVA A,et al.Recombinant tuberculosis allergen (Diaskintest®) in tuberculosis diagnostic in Russia (meta-analysis)[J].Int J Mycobacteriol,2020,9(4):335-346.
[17] RUHWALD M,AGGERBECK H,GALLARDO R V,et al.Safety and efficacy of the C-Tb skin test to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,compared with an interferon γ release assay and the tuberculin skin test:a phase 3,double-blind,randomised,controlled trial[J].Lancet Respir Med,2017,5(4):259-268.
[18] AGGERBECK H,RUHWALD M,HOFF S T,et al.C-Tb skin test to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children and HIV-infected adults:a phase 3 trial[J/OL].PLoS One,2018,13(9)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204554.
[19] LI F,XU M,QIN C,et al.Recombinant fusion ESAT6-CFP10 immunogen as a skin test reagent for tuberculosis diagnosis:an open-label,randomized,two-centre phase 2a clinical trial[J/OL].Clin Microbiol Infect,2016,22(10)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.015.
[20] LI F,XU M,ZHOU L J,et al.Safety of recombinant fusion protein ESAT6-CFP10 as a skin test reagent for tuberculosis diagnosis:an open-label,randomized,single-center phase Ⅰ clinical trial[J].Clin Vaccine Immunol,2016,23(9):767-773.
[21] DAWADI P,POKHAREL B,SHRESTHA A,et al.From bench to bytes:a practical guide to RNA sequencing data analysis[J/OL].Front Genet,2025,16[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1697922.
[22] FANG Y L,ZHAO J J,WANG X Y,et al.Identification of differentially expressed lncRNAs as potential plasma biomarkers for active tuberculosis[J/OL].Tuberculosis (Edinb),2021,128[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2021.102065.
[23] MIRZAEI R,BABAKHANI S,AJORLOO P,et al.The emerging role of exosomal miRNAs as a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J/OL].Mol Med,2021,27(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00296-1.
[24] DE ARAUJO L S,RIBEIRO-ALVES M,LEAL-CALVO T,et al.Reprogramming of small noncoding RNA populations in peripheral blood reveals host biomarkers for latent and active mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J/OL].mBio,2019,10(6)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01037-19.
[25] GUO J B,ZHANG X M,CHEN X C,et al.Proteomics in biomarker discovery for tuberculosis:current status and future perspectives[J/OL].Front Microbiol,2022,13[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.845229.
[26] 贺仁忠,王霄,陈玲,等.结核潜伏感染诊断新型候选标志物的筛选及临床验证[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2018,34(9):794-800.
[27] SUN H S,PAN L P,JIA H Y,et al.Label-free quantitative proteomics identifies novel plasma biomarkers for distinguishing pulmonary tuberculosis and latent infection[J/OL].Front Microbiol,2018,9[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01267.
[28] MATEOS J,ESTÉVEZ O,GONZÁLEZ-FERNÁNDEZ Á,et al.High-resolution quantitative proteomics applied to the study of the specific protein signature in the sputum and saliva of active tuberculosis patients and their infected and uninfected contacts[J].J Proteomics,2019,195:41-52.
[29] DOMINGO-GONZALEZ R,PRINCE O,COOPER A,et al.Cytokines and chemokines in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J/OL].Microbiol Spectr,2016,4(5)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.tbtb2-0018-2016.
[30] WON E J,CHOI J H,CHO Y N,et al.Biomarkers for discrimination between latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis disease[J].J Infect,2017,74(3):281-293.
[31] WANG S,LI Y,SHEN Y J,et al.Screening and identification of a six-cytokine biosignature for detecting TB infection and discriminating active from latent TB[J/OL].J Transl Med,2018,16(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1572-x.
[32] THEODOSIOU A A,READ R C.Artificial intelligence,machine learning and deep learning:potential resources for the infection clinician[J].J Infect,2023,87(4):287-294.
[33] LI L S,YANG L,ZHUANG L,et al.From immunology to artificial intelligence:revolutionizing latent tuberculosis infection diagnosis with machine learning[J/OL].Mil Med Res,2023,10(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00490-8.
[34] LU C Y,WU J,WANG H H,et al.Novel biomarkers distinguishing active tuberculosis from latent infection identified by gene expression profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells[J/OL].PLoS One,2011,6(8)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024290.
[35] WANG S,HE L,WU J,et al.Transcriptional profiling of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells identifies diagnostic biomarkers that distinguish active and latent tuberculosis[J/OL].Front Immunol,2019,10[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02948.
[36] LI J,WANG Y G,YAN L,et al.Novel serological biomarker panel using protein microarray can distinguish active TB from latent TB infection[J/OL].Microbes Infect,2022,24(8)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2022.105002.
[37] AGRANOFF D,FERNANDEZ-REYES D,PAPADOPOULOS M C,et al.Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum[J].Lancet,2006,368(9540):1012-1021.
[38] LUO Y,XUE Y,LIU W,et al.Development of diagnostic algorithm using machine learning for distinguishing between active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection[J/OL].BMC Infect Dis,2022,22(1)[2026-04-25].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07954-7.
[1] 肖筱, 陈彬, 刘巧, 沈鑫. 我国结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查与预防性治疗进展[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 433-437.
[2] 张业晴, 于全骥, 刘巧. 江苏省结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染防治策略、实践与挑战[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 438-441.
[3] 朱珂, 陈高尚, 唐慧玲, 龙智平, 金屡华, 吴佳晖. 金华市HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 452-455.
[4] 孟祥杰, 唐崟, 寿钧, 孙明希, 张钰. 余杭区中学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 456-459,463.
[5] 曾真, 赵丽娜, 单志力, 毛景, 林韩特, 毛玲琼, 李君. 温州市企业职工结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 334-337.
[6] 张文, 吴成果, 郑登虎, 罗建奎, 罗杰, 孙建, 张理翌, 雷蓉蓉, 廖文平. 南川区老年人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 338-342.
[7] 刘扬, 陈莉莉, 辛辛, 肖绍坦, 李世宏. 浦东新区高校肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 226-230.
[8] 王英杰 综述, 孙高峰, 审校. 2型糖尿病预测模型研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 369-372,377.
[9] 潘祥, 童莺歌, 李怡萱, 倪珂, 程雯倩, 辛蒙雨, 胡钰滢. 机器学习方法构建健康素养预测模型的范围综述[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 148-153.
[10] 吕阳, 乐博昕, 胡伟宏, 刘园, 陈昶, 刘效峰. 肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 658-662.
[11] 王慧, 李锦成, 陆兴, 王金富, 竺丽梅, 刘巧. 重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验筛查HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的效果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 639-643.
[12] 刘玥, 刘启玲, 苏海霞, 杨鹏, 张玉海. 机器学习法在生存分析中的应用研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 496-500,505.
[13] 陈莹琦, 辛佳芮, 黄百芬, 胡崇高, 杨磊. 人体血液维生素E检测技术进展[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 46-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed