Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (2): 162-164,168    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.02.018
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药分析
吴玉姣1, 左小明1, 秦科宇2, 张志新2, 张兴3
1.常州市第三人民医院药事科,江苏 常州 213000;
2.常州市第三人民医院,江苏 常州 213000;
3.常州市疾病预防控制中心,江苏 常州 213000
Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosisin Changzhou City
WU Yujiao1, ZUO Xiaoming1, QIN Keyu2, ZHANG Zhixin2, ZHANG Xing3
1. Department of Pharmacy, Changzhou Third People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China;
2. Changzhou Third People's Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China;
3. Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Control, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China
全文: PDF(857 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解江苏省常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药情况及其影响因素,为完善耐药结核病防控策略提供依据。方法 选择2020—2022年在常州市结核病定点医院就诊的>60岁肺结核患者为研究对象,收集人口学信息、既往疾病与诊疗史、药敏试验等资料,分析老年肺结核患者利福平耐药情况及其影响因素。结果 共纳入249例老年肺结核患者,年龄为(69.75±4.36)岁。男性147例,女性102例,男女性别比为1.44∶1。初治患者183例,占73.49%;复治患者66例,占26.51%。利福平耐药21例,耐药率为8.43%。其中初治患者7例,耐药率为3.83%;复治患者14例,耐药率为21.21%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,老年肺结核复治患者利福平耐药风险较高(OR=10.551,95%CI:1.344~82.857)。结论 常州市249例老年肺结核患者利福平耐药率为8.43%,治疗类型是利福平耐药的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴玉姣
左小明
秦科宇
张志新
张兴
关键词 老年人肺结核利福平耐药影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the rifampicin resistance status and its influencing factors among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, so as to provide the basis for improving drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis prevention and control strategies. Methods Patients aged over 60 years with pulmonary tuberculosis treated in tuberculosis designated hospital was selected. Demographic information, history of previous disease, history of diagnosis and treatment and drug sensitivity test were collected. Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and its influencing factors was analyzed. Results Totally 249 elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were included, with an average of (69.75±4.36) years. There were 147 males and 102 females, with a gender ratio of 1.44∶1. There were 183 treatment-naïve patients (73.49%) and 66 retreated patients (26.51%). Rifampicin resistance was found in 21 cases, with a drug resistance rate of 8.43%. Among them, there were 7 treatment-naïve patients (3.83%), and 14 retreated patients (21.21%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that retreated elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis had a higher risk of rifampicin resistance (OR=10.551, 95%CI: 1.344-82.857). Conclusion The rifampicin resistance rate of 249 elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosis was 8.43% and was associated with the type of treatment.
Key wordsthe elderly    pulmonary tuberculosis    rifampicin resistance    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2023-09-11      修回日期: 2024-01-08      出版日期: 2024-02-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:常州市科技项目(CE20215019,CJ20239024); 天晴医院药学基金项目(Q202145)
作者简介: 吴玉姣,硕士,副主任药师,主要从事临床药学工作
通信作者: 张兴,E-mail:369246694@qq.com   
引用本文:   
吴玉姣, 左小明, 秦科宇, 张志新, 张兴. 常州市老年肺结核患者利福平耐药分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 162-164,168.
WU Yujiao, ZUO Xiaoming, QIN Keyu, ZHANG Zhixin, ZHANG Xing. Rifampicin resistance among elderly patients with pulmonary tuberculosisin Changzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(2): 162-164,168.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.02.018      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I2/162
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2022[R/OL].[2024-01-08]. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/TB-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022.
[2] World Health Organization.WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 4:treatment-drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment,2022 update[M]. Geneva:WHO,2022.
[3] LIANG S F,MA J C,WANG G,et al.The application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and drug resistance prediction of pulmonary tuberculosis[J/OL]. Front Med,2022,9 [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.935080.
[4] 舒薇,逄宇,高静韬,等. 中华医学会结核病学分会2022年全国结核病学术大会会议纪要[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2022,45(11):1156-1160.
[5] 中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等. 肺结核基层诊疗指南(2018年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(8):709-717.
[6] 赵雁林. 结核病实验室质量保证手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017.
[7] ASLAM B,KHURSHID M,ARSHAD M I,et al.Antibiotic resistance:one health one world outlook[J/OL]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol,2021,11 [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510.
[8] DEVOID I,SILLAH A K,SUTHERLAND J,et al.The household economic burden of drug-susceptible TB diagnosis and treatment in the Gambia[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2022,26(12):1162-1169.
[9] AIA P,VINEY K,KAL M,et al.The economic burden of TB faced by patients and affected families in Papua New Guinea[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2022,26(10):934-941.
[10] TRAUER J M.Targeted TB control in migrants to low-burden countries[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis,2023,27(3):169-170.
[11] 王远航,胡洁,葛锐,等. 嘉兴市结核分枝杆菌耐药情况分析[J]. 预防医学,2023,35(8):705-709.
[12] 李仁忠,阮云洲,徐彩红,等. 世界卫生组织利福平耐药结核病患者数估算方法[J]. 中国防痨杂志,2023,45(3):328.
[13] 何昱颖,胡屹,陈玮,等. 2014年至2018年贵州省利福平耐药结核病的危险因素及治疗转归分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志,2021,39(5):289-294.
[14] 王荣,杨晨,丁松宁,等. 南京市复治涂阳肺结核患者耐药状况分析[J]. 预防医学,2019,31(5):478-481.
[15] MUTAYOBA B K,ERSHOVA J,LYAMUYA E,et al.The second national anti-tuberculosis drug resistance survey in Tanzania,2017-2018[J]. Trop Med Int Health,2022,27(10):891-901.
[16] DE VOS M,SCOTT L,DAVID A,et al. Comparative analytical evaluation of four centralized platforms for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid[J/OL]. J Clin Microbiol,2021,59(3) [2024-01-08]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02168-20.
[1] 吕婧, 徐欣颖, 乔颖异, 石兴龙, 岳芳, 刘营, 程传龙, 张宇琦, 孙继民, 李秀君. 浙江省发热伴血小板减少综合征流行特征及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 10-14.
[2] 吴成慧, 彭艳红, 张可, 朱维晔, 邓亮, 谭玲玲, 瞿丹丹, 米秋香. 中青年2型糖尿病患者益处发现的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 31-35.
[3] 徐光明, 张震, 叶小红. 2015—2024年临海市新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 71-74.
[4] 李燕冰, 周树彤, 李莹莹, 毕善琳, 李友卫. 农村中老年慢性病患者自我效能感在家庭健康与健康素养间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 75-78,84.
[5] 夏子淇, 陈晴晴, 高四海, 吴矛矛. 温州市中小学生营养健康知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 98-101,106.
[6] 陈慧, 苗姗姗, 刘宪峰, 张慧. 新疆生产建设兵团中小学生龋齿现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 102-106.
[7] 董春玲, 王冲, 关添元, 刘玥, 李雪莹, 张玉海. 基于组轨迹模型的老年人膳食多样性与认知功能研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 865-869.
[8] 杜昌翰, 高琳茜, 卢心雨, 赵渭娟, 李领. 1992—2021年我国老年人群口腔癌疾病负担的年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 870-874.
[9] 章涛, 林君芬, 古雪, 徐乐, 李傅冬, 吴晨. 社区老年人阿尔茨海默病列线图预测模型构建[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 875-880.
[10] 陶桃, 张海芳, 凡鹏飞, 李秋华, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市老年肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 892-896,902.
[11] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
[12] 姜艳, 李锦成, 许纯, 杨科佼, 杨文彬, 徐胜. 扬州市MSM人群艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓率调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 903-906,912.
[13] 凌红, 汪娜, 宋琴, 徐昊. 2009—2023年黄浦区肺结核流行特征和时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 937-940.
[14] 翟羽佳, 章涛, 古雪, 徐乐, 吴梦娜, 林君芬, 吴晨. 社区老年人认知衰弱现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 762-766,772.
[15] 苏德华, 陈向阳, 李君, 赵丽娜, 张鹤美, 朱婷婷, 胡文雪, 赖江宜. 温州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗及时性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 804-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed