Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (1): 39-43    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.01.010
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
某钢铁企业工人职业伤害调查
罗晓蕾, 张嘉文, 江靖雯, 韩雪梅
兰州大学公共卫生学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
Survey on occupational injury among workers in a steel enterprise
LUO Xiaolei, ZHANG Jiawen, JIANG Jingwen, HAN Xuemei
School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
全文: PDF(842 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解甘肃省某钢铁企业工人职业伤害情况及影响因素,为钢铁企业工人职业伤害预防提供依据。方法 于2022年1—3月整群抽取甘肃省某钢铁企业工人为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集基本人口学信息、职业史和职业伤害资料,分析发生职业伤害的工种、伤害部位和类型;采用多因素logistic回归模型分析工人职业伤害的影响因素。结果 发放问卷12 089份,回收有效问卷10 724份,问卷有效率为88.71%。男性9 412人,占87.77%;女性1 312人,占12.23%。年龄MQR)为36.00(15.00)岁。大专及以上文化程度为主,6 056人占56.47%。工龄MQR)为10.00(11.00)年。发生职业伤害563例,占5.25%。职业伤害主要工种为检修工,占11.90%;伤害类型主要为物体打击,占18.25%;伤害部位主要为下肢,占27.82%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,男性(OR=2.464,95%CI:1.580~3.843)、年龄(30~<40岁,OR=2.561,95%CI:1.643~3.993;40~<50岁,OR=5.197,95%CI:2.679~10.079;≥50岁,OR=10.620,95%CI:6.788~16.615)、高温暴露(OR=1.400,95%CI:1.165~1.683)、作业设备故障(OR=1.291,95%CI:1.048~1.591)、无个人安全防护设备(OR=1.555,95%CI:1.064~2.273)和安全行为评分(OR=0.967,95%CI:0.937~0.996)是钢铁企业工人职业伤害的影响因素。结论 该钢铁企业男性工人、检修工是职业伤害高危人群,伤害类型主要为物体打击,下肢受伤为主。职业伤害的发生受到性别、年龄、工作环境、设备状态和安全行为的影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
罗晓蕾
张嘉文
江靖雯
韩雪梅
关键词 钢铁企业职业伤害影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the prevalence of occupational injury and identify its influencing factors among workers in a steel enterprise in Gansu Province, so as to provide insights into prevention of occupational injury among steel workers. Methods Workers were sampled from a steel enterprise in Gansu Province using a cluster sampling method from January to March 2022, and participants' demographics, occupational history and occupational injury were collected using questionnaire surveys. The type of job and site and type of injury were analyzed among workers with occupational injuries, and factors affecting workers' occupational injuries were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 12 089 questionnaires were allocated and 10 725 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 88.71%. The respondents included 9 412 males (87.77%) and 1 312 females (12.23%), and had a median age of 36.00 (interquartile range, 15.00) years. Junior college and above was the predominant educational level (6 056 workers, 56.47%), and the respondents had a median length of service of 10 (interquartile range, 11) years. The prevalence of occupational injury was 5.25% among respondents. Overhaul worker was the main type of job (11.90%), and object strike was the predominant type of occupational injury (18.25%), while the lower limb was the predominant site of injury (27.82%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified men (OR=2.464, 95%CI: 1.580-3.843), age (30 to 39 years, OR=2.561, 95%CI: 1.643-3.993; 40 to 49 years, OR=5.197, 95%CI: 2.679-10.079; 50 years and older, OR=10.620, 95%CI: 6.788-16.615), exposure to high temperature (OR=1.400, 95%CI: 1.165-1.683), operating equipment failure (OR=1.291, 95%CI: 1.048-1.591), absence of personal safety protection equipment (OR=1.555, 95%CI: 1.064-2.273) and safety behavior scores (OR=0.967, 95%CI: 0.937-0.996) as factors affecting occupational injuries among workers in a steel enterprise. Conclusions Men and overhaul workers are at a high risk of occupational injuries in this steel enterprise. Objectstrike is the predominant type of injury and lower limb is the main site of injury. The risk of occupational injuries is affected by gender, age, working environments, equipment status and safety behaviors.
Key wordssteel enterprise    occupational injury    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2023-08-18      修回日期: 2023-10-27      出版日期: 2024-01-10
中图分类号:  R135  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(72274087); 甘肃省自然科学基金项目(22JR5RA498)
作者简介: 罗晓蕾,硕士研究生在读,公共卫生专业
通信作者: 韩雪梅,E-mail:xmhan123@163.com   
引用本文:   
罗晓蕾, 张嘉文, 江靖雯, 韩雪梅. 某钢铁企业工人职业伤害调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 39-43.
LUO Xiaolei, ZHANG Jiawen, JIANG Jingwen, HAN Xuemei. Survey on occupational injury among workers in a steel enterprise. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(1): 39-43.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.01.010      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I1/39
[1] 邬堂春. 职业卫生与职业医学:第8版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2017:322-324.
[2] International Labour Organization.Quick guide on sources and uses of statistics on occupational safety and health[EB/OL].[2023-10-27].https://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/publications/WCMS_759401/lang--en/index.htm.
[3] RAJAK R,CHATTOPADHYAY A,MAURYA P.Accidents and injuries in workers of iron and steel industry in West Bengal,India:prevalence and associated risk factors[J].Int J Occup Saf Ergon,2022,28(4):2533-2540.
[4] 中国钢铁新闻网.世界钢协发布行业安全与职业健康数据报告(2023)[EB/OL].[2023-10-27].http://www.csteelnews.com/xwzx/gjgt/202305/t20230526_75146.html.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家标准局.企业职工伤亡事故分类标准:GB 6441—86[S].1986.
[6] 胡伟江,周安寿.某钢铁企业非致死性职业伤害流行病学调查[J].中国职业医学,2010,37(1):29-31.
[7] 谢晶,白梅,杨莉,等.某钢铁厂1998—2008年职业伤害危险因素分析[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(7):630-636.
[8] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.人社部等八部门印发工伤预防五年行动计划(2021—2025年)[EB/OL].[2023-10-27].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-01/23/content_5582060.html.
[9] 张琳. 1975至2015年徐州铁路职业伤害流行病学研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2016,34(8):586-590.
[10] REY-MERCHÁN M D C,LÓPEZ-ARQUILLOS A.Organizational and personal factors in occupational traffic injuries at work in Spain[J].Traffic Inj Prev,2021,22(7):519-523.
[11] 李雪,王力民,张宁,等.2008—2017年乌鲁木齐铁路局职业伤害流行病学特征分析[J].现代预防医学,2018,45(17):3107-3110,3117.
[12] 雷林,周海滨,彭绩.2012—2016年深圳急门诊职业伤害病例特征分析[J].伤害医学(电子版),2017,6(3):47-51.
[13] 鲁京浦. 2006—2010年胜利油田职业伤害流行病学特征分析[J].中国职业医学,2015,42(4):476-480.
[14] MULUGETA H,BIRILE A,KETEMA H,et al.Non-fatal occupational injury prevalence and associated factors in an integrated large-scale textile industry in Addis Ababa,Ethiopia[J/OL].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022,19(6)[2023-10-27].https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063688.
[15] LIAO C W,CHIANG T L.Occupational injuries among non-standard workers in the Taiwan construction industry[J].J Safety Res,2022,82:301-313.
[16] EBI K L,CAPON A,BERRY P,et al.Hot weather and heat extremes:health risks[J].Lancet,2021,398(10301):698-708.
[17] 李向文,王永斌,刘启玲,等.噪声和高温职业暴露与高血压的关系研究[J].预防医学,2019,31(12):1189-1192,1199.
[18] 王力民,李雪,尹建刚.铁及其化合物粉尘职业暴露与呼吸系统损害[J].预防医学,2016,28(2):145-147,151.
[19] DAS B.Assessment of ergonomic exposure,work-related occupational injuries,and prevention:child work in the brickfield industry in India[J].Toxicol Ind Health,2021,37(8):481-495.
[20] WIN K N,TRIVEDI A,LAI A,et al.Non-fatal occupational accidents in Brunei Darussalam[J].Ind Health,2021,59(3):193-200.
[1] 吴成慧, 彭艳红, 张可, 朱维晔, 邓亮, 谭玲玲, 瞿丹丹, 米秋香. 中青年2型糖尿病患者益处发现的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 31-35.
[2] 徐光明, 张震, 叶小红. 2015—2024年临海市新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 71-74.
[3] 夏子淇, 陈晴晴, 高四海, 吴矛矛. 温州市中小学生营养健康知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 98-101,106.
[4] 陈慧, 苗姗姗, 刘宪峰, 张慧. 新疆生产建设兵团中小学生龋齿现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 102-106.
[5] 吕婧, 徐欣颖, 乔颖异, 石兴龙, 岳芳, 刘营, 程传龙, 张宇琦, 孙继民, 李秀君. 浙江省发热伴血小板减少综合征流行特征及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 10-14.
[6] 陶桃, 张海芳, 凡鹏飞, 李秋华, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市老年肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 892-896,902.
[7] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
[8] 姜艳, 李锦成, 许纯, 杨科佼, 杨文彬, 徐胜. 扬州市MSM人群艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓率调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 903-906,912.
[9] 翟羽佳, 章涛, 古雪, 徐乐, 吴梦娜, 林君芬, 吴晨. 社区老年人认知衰弱现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 762-766,772.
[10] 苏德华, 陈向阳, 李君, 赵丽娜, 张鹤美, 朱婷婷, 胡文雪, 赖江宜. 温州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗及时性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 804-808.
[11] 严青秀, 王炜, 郝晓刚, 高宇, 方春福, 张幸, 刘文峰. 2017—2023年衢州市肺结核患者未收治情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 799-803.
[12] 王晓宇, 张志平, 董玉颖, 梁杰, 陈强. 老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 809-813.
[13] 王海琪, 张涵潇, 杨凤云, 国献丽, 范生荣, 张丽锋, 蒋泓. 嘉定区中学生抑郁情绪调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 832-836.
[14] 成灵灵, 阎亚琼, 白增华, 张晓刚, 郝丽婷, 杨慧莹. 先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿年龄别体质指数Z评分变化轨迹及影响因素[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 858-863.
[15] 陈强, 郭震, 朱玮, 何晓庆, 朱斌斌. 金华市重点人群职业健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 747-750,756.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed