Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 350-354,358    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.019
  健康教育 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社区高血压患者Triangle分层分级管理效果评价
张红1, 胡志明2, 潘晓锋3, 朱梦胜1, 戴伟丽4, 谢伊丽2, 诸建方1
1.杭州市第九人民医院健康事业发展部,浙江 杭州 311225;
2.杭州市第九人民医院,浙江 杭州 311225;
3.杭州市钱塘区前进街道社区卫生服务中心,浙江 杭州 311228;
4.杭州市钱塘区河庄街道社区卫生服务中心,浙江 杭州 311222
Effect of Triangle hierarchical management among community patients with hypertension
ZHANG Hong1, HU Zhiming2, PAN Xiaofeng3, ZHU Mengsheng1, DAI Weili4, XIE Yili2, ZHU Jianfang1
1. Department of Health Development, Hangzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311225, China;
2. Hangzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311225, China;
3. Qianjin Community Health Service Center, Qiantang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311228, China;
4. Hezhuang Community Health Service Center, Qiantang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311222, China
全文: PDF(1026 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价社区高血压患者实施Triangle分层分级管理的效果,为加强高血压规范化管理提供依据。方法 选择杭州市钱塘区2家社区卫生服务中心2020年底新确诊的高血压患者,随机分配至常规组和Triangle组。常规组患者按照基本公共卫生服务规范要求实施健康管理服务,Triangle组患者实施Triangle分层分级管理,为期1年。采用自我管理行为量表、治疗依从性量表和自行设计的问卷调查两组患者干预前后血压,自我管理行为,治疗依从性,以及吸烟、饮酒、锻炼等管理指标,采用协方差分析和广义估计方程比较两组干预前后差异。结果 常规组和Triangle组各纳入100例。干预前两组患者性别、年龄、文化程度和职业等基本人口学资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,Triangle组患者血压下降幅度,自我管理行为总分及其治疗管理、饮食管理、运动管理和生活习惯管理维度评分的上升幅度,治疗依从性总分及其遵医服药行为、日常生活管理行为和烟酒嗜好管理维度评分的上升幅度,戒烟、戒酒、锻炼和血压达标患者数增加幅度均大于常规组,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 Triangle分层分级管理可提高高血压患者治疗依从性,改善患者自我管理行为,有利于患者血压控制,可在社区高血压患者健康管理中推广应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张红
胡志明
潘晓锋
朱梦胜
戴伟丽
谢伊丽
诸建方
关键词 高血压Triangle 分层分级管理自我管理行为治疗依从性    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effect of Triangle hierarchical management among community patients with hypertension, so as to provide insights into the improvements of standardized hypertension management. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed hypertension from 2 community health service centers in Qiantang District of Hangzhou City by the end of 2020 were randomly assigned to the conventional group and the Triangle group. Patients in the conventional group were given health management services according to the requirements of basic public health service standard for one year, while patients in the Triangle group were given Triangle hierarchical management. The blood pressure, self-management behaviors, treatment compliance, smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise were collected using the self-management behavior scale, treatment compliance scale and self-designed questionnaires, and were compared before and after intervention with analysis of covariance and generalized estimation equations. Results Totally 200 patients with hypertension were recruited, including 100 patients in the conventional group and 100 patients in the Triangle group. There were no significant differences between the two groups before implementation of interventions in terms of gender, age, educational level or occupation (P>0.05). The reduction in blood pressure, increase in the score of treatment, diet, exercise and living habitat management and the total score of self-management behaviors, increase in the score of adherence to medication regimens, daily living management behaviors, smoking and alcohol consumption preference and the total score of treatment compliance, and increase in the number of patients with normal standard of quitting smoking, quitting alcohol consumption, exercise and blood pressure were significantly higher in the Triangle group than in the conventional group after intervention (P<0.05). Conclusions Triangle hierarchical management may increase the treatment compliance, improve the self-management behavior and facilitate hypertension control among hypertensive patients, which may be popularized for health management among community patients with hypertension.
Key wordshypertension    Triangle hierarchical management    self-management behavior    treatment compliance
收稿日期: 2022-11-09      修回日期: 2023-02-23      出版日期: 2023-04-10
中图分类号:  R544.1  
基金资助:杭州市医药卫生科技项目(B20200007)
作者简介: 张红,本科,副主任护师,主要从事公共卫生管理、医联体管理工作
引用本文:   
张红, 胡志明, 潘晓锋, 朱梦胜, 戴伟丽, 谢伊丽, 诸建方. 社区高血压患者Triangle分层分级管理效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 350-354,358.
ZHANG Hong, HU Zhiming, PAN Xiaofeng, ZHU Mengsheng, DAI Weili, XIE Yili, ZHU Jianfang. Effect of Triangle hierarchical management among community patients with hypertension. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(4): 350-354,358.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.019      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I4/350
[1] NCD Risk Factor Collaboration(NCD-RisC).Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015:a pooled analysis of 1 479 population-based measurement studies with 19.1 million participants[J].Lancet,2017,389(10064):37-55.
[2] 金桂凤,程丽,王钰.分层次护理管理在高血压合并心脑血管危险因素患者中的应用[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2017,14(20):52-54.
[3] FEACHEM R G A,SEKHRI N K,WHITE K L.Getting more for their dollar:a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente[J/OL].BMJ,2002,324(7330):135-141.
[4] 中国老年学和老年医学学会心脑血管病专业委员会,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会.老年高血压的诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2017版)[J].中华内科杂志,2017,56(11):885-893.
[5] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会,高血压联盟(中国),中华医学会心血管病学分会,等.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J].中国心血管杂志,2019,24(1):24-56.
[6] 刘宁,张婧珺,鱼星锋,等.高血压病人自我管理量表的研制与信效度检验[J].护理研究,2015,29(14):1764-1767.
[7] 唐红英,朱京慈,何海燕,等.高血压治疗依从性量表的编制及信效度研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2011,33(13):1400-1403.
[8] 陈琪,徐建华,王小飞,等.高血压规范化管理实施效果及其影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2018,30(4):377-381.
[9] 周忠贤,费丽萍,田海艳,等.社区高血压患者家庭血压监测行为及影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2021,33(11):1142-1145.
[10] 张梅,吴静,张笑,等.2018年中国成年居民高血压患病与控制状况研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(10):1780-1789.
[11] WANG Z W,WANG X,CHEN Z,et al.Hypertension control in community health centers across China:analysis of antihypertensive drug treatment patterns[J].Am J Hypertens,2014,27(2):252-259.
[1] 郭艳强, 张丽, 张兰, 韩荣荣. 高血压患者肥胖类型与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 36-42.
[2] 孟杨, 万金豹, 吴萃, 陈秋艳, 严青华, 程旻娜. 上海市农村高血压患者高血压知信行及家庭血压测量调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 737-742.
[3] 陆丽君, 袁磊, 李殿江, 卢昆, 朱怡萱, 王志勇, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我管理行为在抑郁症状与血糖控制间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 455-459.
[4] 李倩, 杨柏林, 陈积标, 尹寒露, 许祝平, 孟晓军. 无锡市50岁及以上HIV/AIDS抗病毒治疗病例自报慢性病资料分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 390-394.
[5] 王启开, 弭亚楠, 刘好, 林嘉浩, 杨鑫源, 王越, 金千靖, 宋照猛. 高血压肾病患者膳食干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 373-377.
[6] 缪彩云, 覃玉, 万亚男, 陈路路, 崔岚, 王小莉. 江苏省居民自测血压行为及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 223-227.
[7] 俞丹丹, 张雅萍, 许慧琳, 何丹丹, 梁彤彤, 杨加丽, 李俊. 糖尿病共病患者自我管理行为与时间洞察力的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 130-134.
[8] 叶振淼, 张默涵, 樊丽辉, 谢轶敏, 姜雪霞, 郑宇航, 罗永园, 夏喆铮, 金茜, 孙倩. 超重、肥胖、中心性肥胖与高血压的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(11): 1113-1118.
[9] 白开智, 章光明, 吴晓虹, 王小红, 徐则林, 庞志峰. 中国内脏脂肪指数预测高血压风险研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(11): 1119-1123.
[10] 龚海英, 薛凤玉, 刘晓芬, 邢瑞婷, 苗雨阳, 赵耀. 18~79岁居民高血压风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1075-1080.
[11] 金丹, 张开月, 王静. 家庭固体燃料使用与糖尿病、高血压风险的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 679-682.
[12] 陈德彬, 申锦玉. 厦门市居民慢性病患病情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 622-625.
[13] 黄文, 汤佳良, 陈康康, 黄敏钢, 陈奇峰. 高血压合并糖尿病患者睡眠质量调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 296-298,303.
[14] 高慧, 朱旭婷, 张磊, 夏庆华, 王英全, 张艳萍, 许姜敏, 施悦, 史午悦, 姜玉, 万金豹. 高血压发病年龄与糖尿病的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(11): 921-925,930.
[15] 李晴, 潘宁宁, 刘敏, 李园, 张普洪, 白雅敏, 徐建伟. 正常高值血压、高血压与微量白蛋白尿的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(11): 961-964.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed