Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (5): 483-487    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.05.012
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地铁环境氡浓度调查及工作人员暴露剂量评估
郝小吉, 俞顺飞, 郭佳娣, 赖忠俊, 曹艺耀, 王东航, 宣志强
浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310051
Investigation of radon concentration and assessment of occupational exposure dose in the metro environment
HAO Xiaoji, YU Shunfei, GUO Jiadi, LAI Zhongjun, CAO Yiyao, WANG Donghang, XUAN Zhiqiang
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China
全文: PDF(861 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解杭州市地铁1号线和5号线氡浓度及工作人员氡暴露剂量,为评估氡暴露潜在健康风险、保障地铁工作人员职业健康提供依据。方法 于2022年3月—2023年3月,对杭州市地铁1号线和5号线53个车站开展氡浓度监测,每个车站布设车控室、客服中心、安检区和站台4个采样点;其中车控室开展为期1年的连续监测,其他采样点开展为期1个季度的连续监测。采用CR-39累积氡探测杯检测氡浓度,采用RAD7测氡仪检测瞬时氡浓度,并估算氡及其子体所致的工作人员人均年有效剂量;分析不同线路、采样点和季度氡浓度。结果 地铁1号线氡浓度MQR)为26.8(11.2)Bq/m3,瞬时氡浓度MQR)为4.7(8.5)Bq/m3;5号线氡浓度为(26.1±6.1)Bq/m3,瞬时氡浓度MQR)为4.7(7.4)Bq/m3;2条线路氡浓度和瞬时氡浓度差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。地铁1号线和5号线车控室氡浓度较高,MQR)分别为42.5(24.3)、26.8(6.1)Bq/m3。1号线车控室各季度氡浓度MQR)分别为37.7(27.5)、42.5(24.4)、46.8(26.0)和34.9(29.0)Bq/m3,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);5号线分别为24.8±6.7、26.6(5.9)、33.8±7.9、22.8(8.7)Bq/m3,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中第三季度氡浓度高于第一季度和第四季度(均P<0.05)。地铁1号线车控室、5号线站台氡及其子体所致的工作人员人均年有效剂量较高,分别为0.305 2、0.255 9 mSv。结论 杭州市地铁1号线、5号线环境氡浓度处于低剂量辐射范围,符合国家相关标准限值要求,无显著健康风险;需重点关注车控室和第三季度氡浓度,加强监测与通风管理。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郝小吉
俞顺飞
郭佳娣
赖忠俊
曹艺耀
王东航
宣志强
关键词 氡浓度地铁年有效剂量氡子体浓度    
AbstractObjective To investigate the radon concentration and occupational radon exposure doses in Hangzhou Metro Line 1 and Line 5, so as to provide a basis for assessing potential health risks of radon exposure and protecting the occupational health of metro workers. Methods From March 2022 to March 2023, radon concentration monitoring was conducted at 53 stations on Hangzhou Metro Lines 1 and 5. Four sampling points were set up at each station: train control room, customer service center, security checkpoint area, and platform. Continuous monitoring was conducted for one year at the train control room, while continuous monitoring at the other sampling points lasted for one quarter. CR-39 cumulative radon detection cups were used to measure radon concentrations, while RAD7 radon detectors were used to measure instantaneous radon concentrations. The annual effective dose to workers from radon and its progeny was estimated. Radon concentrations across different lines, sampling points, and seasons were analyzed. Results The median radon concentration was 26.8 (interquartile range, 11.2) Bq/m3 in Line 1, and the median instantaneous radon concentration was 4.7 (interquartile range, 8.5) Bq/m3. In Line 5, the radon concentration was (26.1±6.1) Bq/m3, and the median instantaneous radon concentration was 4.7 (interquartile range, 7.4) Bq/m3. No significant differences were found between the two lines in either radon or instantaneous radon concentrations (both P>0.05). The control rooms in both lines showed relatively high radon levels, with a median of 42.5 (interquartile ranges, 24.3) Bq/m3 in Line 1 and a median of 26.8 (interquartile ranges, 6.1) Bq/m3 in Line 5. In the Line 1 control room, the median radon concentrations across four quarters were 37.7 (interquartile range, 27.5), 42.5 (interquartile range, 24.4), 46.8 (interquartile range, 26.0), and 34.9 (interquartile range, 29.0) Bq/m3, respectively. No significant seasonal variation was observed (P>0.05). In the Line 5 control room, the values were 24.8±6.7, 26.6 (5.9), 33.8±7.9, and 22.8 (8.7) Bq/m3, respectively. A significant seasonal difference was found (P<0.05), with the third quarter showing higher radon levels than the first and fourth quarters (both P<0.05). The annual effective doses to workers from radon and its progeny were relatively high in the Line 1 control room (0.305 2 mSv) and the Line 5 platform (0.255 9 mSv). Conclusions The radon concentrations in Hangzhou Metro Lines 1 and 5 were within the low-dose radiation range and met the national standard limits. No significant health risks were identified. However, attention should be paid to radon levels in control rooms and during the third quarter. Enhanced monitoring and ventilation management are recommended.
Key wordsradon concentration    metro    annual effective dose    radon progeny concentration
收稿日期: 2025-12-26      修回日期: 2026-04-28     
中图分类号:  R144  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金项目(2022KY133)
作者简介: 郝小吉,硕士,主管医师,主要从事放射卫生工作
通信作者: 宣志强,E-mail:zhqxuan@cdc.zj.cn   
引用本文:   
郝小吉, 俞顺飞, 郭佳娣, 赖忠俊, 曹艺耀, 王东航, 宣志强. 地铁环境氡浓度调查及工作人员暴露剂量评估[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 483-487.
HAO Xiaoji, YU Shunfei, GUO Jiadi, LAI Zhongjun, CAO Yiyao, WANG Donghang, XUAN Zhiqiang. Investigation of radon concentration and assessment of occupational exposure dose in the metro environment. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(5): 483-487.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.05.012      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I5/483
[1] GRZYWA-CELIŃSKA A,KRUSIŃSKI A,MAZUR J,et al.Radon:the element of risk.the impact of radon exposure on human health[J/OL].Toxics,2020,8(4)[2026-04-28].https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8040120.
[2] NIE J H,CHEN Z H,LIU X,et al.Oxidative damage in various tissues of rats exposed to radon[J].J Toxicol Environ Health Part A,2012,75(12):694-699.
[3] 苗晓翔,苏垠平,武云云,等.我国室内氡致肺癌的疾病负担估算[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2024,44(12):1069-1076.
[4] 司凌霄,唐梦然,童海强,等.杭州地铁通勤客流特征研究[J].现代城市轨道交通,2024(7):100-108.
[5] 王欣,陈英民,王垒,等.山东省矿井下工作人员职业性照射初步评价[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(3):273-275.
[6] 徐立鹏,陈立,王先良,等.成都地铁氡浓度水平调查研究[J].辐射防护,2024,44(4):367-373.
[7] 石梦蝶,闵之藤,刘华牛,等.武汉市地铁线路运行期间氡浓度调查分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2024,33(5):505-509.
[8] 朱伟寿,林静,李仲修,等.乌鲁木齐地铁一号线氡浓度调查[J].疾病预防控制通报,2021,36(4):59-60,72.
[9] 王晨,丁艳秋,邓君,等.基于TASLIMAGE系统的CR-39氡探测器测量氡的蚀刻条件研究[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(2):148-152.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.公共地下建筑及地热水应用中氡的放射防护要求:WS/T 668—2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
[11] 张凯,杨翊方,王海军,等.密闭空间氡浓度垂直分布规律的实验研究[J].辐射研究与辐射工艺学报,2011,29(3):189-191.
[12] 高鹏,刘陆,甘睿琳,等.北京市地铁站台及车箱内氡浓度水平调查[J].核安全,2021,20(1):17-21.
[13] 王成明.成都地铁一号线站台内空气中氡浓度分布状况研究[J].四川环境,2015,34(1):146-149.
[14] 翁绪,罗维均,王彦伟,等.贵阳地铁1号线氡浓度特征及其潜在健康效应评估[J].地球与环境,2022,50(1):131-139.
[15] 鞠志萍,黄伊林,彭文斌,等.南宁市地铁一号线氡浓度调查与分析[J].广西科技大学学报,2019,30(04):1-5,14.
[16] 翟江龙,朱国英,张燕燕,等.2009年上海市地铁车站放射性水平[J].环境与职业医学,2012,29(7):407-410,419.
[17] 胡丹,杨维耿,宋建锋,等.浙江省居室内氡浓度和γ辐射水平的初步调查[J].中国辐射卫生,2011,20(1):77-79.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.电离辐射防护与辐射源安全基本标准:GB 18871—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
[1] 冯越, 陈茸, 沈小磊, 曾亚楠, 李清华. 无锡市住宅室内氡浓度调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 415-418.
[2] 王凯, 张霞, 苏瑾. 地铁车站PM2.5金属元素污染水平调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1096-1099.
[3] 王小林, 聂臻, 刘斯峰, 郑夏雯, 郑钊, 沈爱新. 拟建核电站周边环境放射性元素监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(5): 513-514,517.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed