Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (4): 325-328    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.04.001
  结核病主动发现与预防性干预专题 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
结核肉芽肿自噬相关基因与免疫浸润的相关性分析
李广辉1, 李之威1, 冯豪2, 梁真真3
1.苏州市吴中区疾病预防控制中心(苏州市吴中区卫生监督所),江苏 苏州 215100;
2.嘉兴市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 嘉兴 314050;
3.河南医药大学公共卫生学院,河南 新乡 453003
Correlation between autophagy-related genes and immune infiltration in tuberculous granuloma
LI Guanghui1, LI Zhiwei1, FENG Hao2, LIANG Zhenzhen3
1. Wuzhong District Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Wuzhong District Institute of Public Health Supervision), Suzhou, Jiangsu 215100, China;
2. Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314050, China;
3. School of Public Health, Henan Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan 453003, China
全文: PDF(915 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 应用生物信息学分析方法筛选结核肉芽肿差异表达的自噬相关基因(DEARG),并分析其与免疫浸润的相关性,为探究结核病(TB)发病机制提供理论依据。方法 通过Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO)数据库获取人结核肉芽肿GSE184537数据集作为分析集、GSE157671数据集作为验证集,通过人类自噬基因数据库自噬相关基因(ARG)获取232个ARG,筛选结核肉芽肿组织差异表达的ARG(DEARG)。对DEARG进行富集分析、蛋白互作网络分析,筛选关键基因;采用单样本基因集富集分析评估24种免疫细胞浸润丰度,并采用Spearman秩相关分析关键基因与免疫细胞浸润丰度的相关性。采用GSE157671数据集验证关键基因表达差异。结果 GSE184537数据集与232个ARG取交集,共获得24个DEARG;富集分析结果显示,其生物过程显著富集于自噬、蛋白质磷酸化和细胞生长调节,并富集于自噬、细胞凋亡、低氧诱导因子-1信号通路和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶信号通路等10条通路。蛋白互作网络分析筛选BIRC5IFNGCXCR4FOSERBB2TNFSF10EGFRCTSB共8个关键基因。免疫浸润分析结果显示,结核肉芽肿组织CD4+ T淋巴细胞、iTreg细胞和Tfh细胞浸润丰度较高,单核细胞、中性粒细胞和NK细胞浸润丰度较低(均P<0.05);Spearman秩相关性分析显示,8个关键基因与24种免疫细胞浸润水平存在相关性,其中ERBB2与NK细胞呈强正相关,CXCR4与NK细胞呈强负相关(均P<0.05)。GSE157671数据集验证结果显示,6个关键基因与GSE184537数据集差异分析趋势一致。结论 本研究筛选出BIRC5IFNGCXCR4等8个关键ARG,可通过调控免疫细胞浸润参与TB发生发展,可作为TB发病机制研究的潜在候选基因。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李广辉
李之威
冯豪
梁真真
关键词 自噬免疫浸润生物信息学分析结核肉芽肿结核病    
AbstractObjective To screen differentially expressed autophagy-related genes (DEARGs) in tuberculous granuloma using bioinformatics analysis and to analyze their correlation with immune infiltration, so as to provide a theoretical basis for investigating the pathogenesis of tuberculosis (TB). Methods The GSE184537 dataset of human tuberculous granuloma was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database as the analysis set, and the GSE157671 dataset was used as the validation set. A total of 232 autophagy-related genes (ARGs) were retrieved from the Human Autophagy Gene Database. DEARGs in tuberculous granuloma tissues were screened. Enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction network analysis were performed on the DEARGs to identify key genes. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was used to evaluate the infiltration abundance of 24 immune cell types, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between key genes and immune cell infiltration abundance. The GSE157671 dataset was used to validate the expression differences of key genes. Results A total of 24 DEARGs were obtained by intersecting the GSE184537 dataset with 232 ARGs. Enrichment analysis showed that the biological processes were significantly enriched in autophagy, protein phosphorylation, and cell growth regulation, and the pathways were enriched in 10 pathways including autophagy, apoptosis, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 signaling pathway, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Protein-protein interaction network analysis was performed to screen a total of 8 key genes, including BIRC5, IFNG, CXCR4, FOS, ERBB2, TNFSF10, EGFR, and CTSB. Immune infiltration analysis showed that the infiltration abundances of CD4+ T lymphocytes, iTreg cells, and Tfh cells were relatively high in tuberculous granuloma tissues, while those of monocytes, neutrophils, and NK cells were relatively low (all P<0.05). Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed that the eight key genes were correlated with the infiltration levels of 24 immune cell types. Among them, ERBB2 exhibited a strong positive correlation and CXCR4 exhibited a strong negative correlation with NK cells (both P<0.05). Validation results in the GSE157671 dataset showed the differential expression trends of the 6 key genes were consistent with those in the GSE184537 dataset. Conclusion This study identified eight key ARGs, including BIRC5, IFNG, and CXCR4, which may participate in the development and progression of TB by regulating immune cell infiltration and could serve as potential candidate genes for further research on the pathogenesis of TB.
Key wordsautophagy    immune infiltration    bioinformatics analysis    tuberculous granuloma    tuberculosis
收稿日期: 2026-01-25      修回日期: 2026-04-07      出版日期: 2026-04-10
中图分类号:  R52  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(82304081)
作者简介: 李广辉,硕士,医师,主要从事结核病防制工作
通信作者: 梁真真,E-mail:221010@xxmu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
李广辉, 李之威, 冯豪, 梁真真. 结核肉芽肿自噬相关基因与免疫浸润的相关性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 325-328.
LI Guanghui, LI Zhiwei, FENG Hao, LIANG Zhenzhen. Correlation between autophagy-related genes and immune infiltration in tuberculous granuloma. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(4): 325-328.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.04.001      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I4/325
[1] KAUL S,KAUR I,MEHTA S,et al.Cutaneous tuberculosis.Part I:pathogenesis,classification,and clinical features[J].J Am Acad Dermatol,2023,89(6):1091-1103.
[2] JANSSEN S,MURPHY M,UPTON C,et al.Tuberculosis:an update for the clinician[J].Respirology,2025,30(3):196-205.
[3] COHEN S B,GERN B H,URDAHL K B.The tuberculous granuloma and preexisting immunity[J].Annu Rev Immunol,2022,40:589-614.
[4] GERN B H,ADAMS K N,PLUMLEE C R,et al.TGFβ restricts expansion,survival,and function of T cells within the tuberculous granuloma[J].Cell Host Microbe,2021,29(4):594-606.
[5] MCCAFFREY E F,DONATO M,KEREN L,et al.The immunoregulatory landscape of human tuberculosis granulomas[J].Nat Immunol,2022,23(2):318-329.
[6] NISA A,KIPPER F C,PANIGRAHY D,et al.Different modalities of host cell death and their impact on Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection[J].Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,2022,323(5):1444-1474.
[7] RAMAKRISHNAN L.Revisiting the role of the granuloma in tuberculosis[J].Nat Rev Immunol,2012,12(5):352-366.
[8] KIM Y S,SILWAL P,KIM S Y,et al.Autophagy-activating strategies to promote innate defense against mycobacteria[J].Exp Mol Med,2019,51(12):1-10.
[9] SHENG Y F,HUA H B,YONG Y,et al.Identification of hub genes and typing of tuberculosis infections based on autophagy-related genes[J].Pol J Microbiol,2023,72(3):223-238.
[10] SUN Q F,LI S S,GAO M Q,et al.Therapeutic strategies for tuberculosis:progress and lessons learned[J].Biomed Environ Sci,2024,37(11):1310-1323.
[11] SHARIQ M,QUADIR N,ALAM A,et al.The exploitation of host autophagy and ubiquitin machinery by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in shaping immune responses and host defense during infection[J].Autophagy,2023,19(1):3-23.
[12] LAM A,PRABHU R,GROSS C M,et al.Role of apoptosis and autophagy in tuberculosis[J].Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,2017,313(2):218-229.
[13] BRAGINA E Y,TIYS E S,RUDKO A A,et al.Novel tuberculosis susceptibility candidate genes revealed by the reconstruction and analysis of associative networks[J].Infect Genet Evol,2016,46:118-123.
[14] LU Y,WANG X M,DONG H C,et al.Bioinformatics analysis of microRNA expression between patients with and without latent tuberculosis infections[J].Exp Ther Med,2019,17(5):3977-3988.
[15] PAHLAVAN Y,KAHROBA H,SAMADI N,et al.Survivin modulatory role in autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases[J].J Cell Physiol,2019,234(11):19440-19450.
[16] SOUZA DE LIMA D,OGUSKU M M,SADAHIRO A,et al.Inflammasome genetics contributes to the development and control of active pulmonary tuberculosis[J].Infect Genet Evol,2016,41:240-244.
[17] ROVETTA A I,PEÑA D,HERNÁNDEZ DEL PINO R E,et al.IFNG-mediated immune responses enhance autophagy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in patients with active tuberculosis[J].Autophagy,2014,10(12):2109-2121.
[18] DEBNATH J,GAMMOH N,RYAN K M.Autophagy and autophagy-related pathways in cancer[J].Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,2023,24(8):560-575.
[1] 曾真, 赵丽娜, 单志力, 毛景, 林韩特, 毛玲琼, 李君. 温州市企业职工结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 334-337.
[2] 陈彬. 关口前移,创新驱动,迈向终结结核流行[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 217-221.
[3] 马宵, 宁士龙. 1993—2021年中国归因于烟草的广泛耐药结核病疾病负担分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(12): 1266-1271.
[4] 陈高尚, 朱凯强, 朱军礼, 李克. 金华市学生结核病病例发现延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 698-701.
[5] 张亚欣, 贾生青, 王兆芬, 王兴斌, 杨得杰, 赵昌明. 2006—2020年海东市结核病发病的年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(12): 1052-1056,1059.
[6] 高锦, 杜孝康, 项海燕, 范超明, 蔡成松, 潘峰. 结核潜伏感染和活动性结核病患者血浆外泌体mRNA表达谱分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 70-73, 77.
[7] 胡嘉, 黄钦, 郑建刚, 何旺瑞, 曾艳文. 江西省居民结核病防治核心信息知晓情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 718-720,731.
[8] 马丽, 梁智超, 陈阳贵, 张为胜, 毛宏凯, 胥婉婷, 曹明芹. 2010—2019年乌鲁木齐市学生结核病病例发现延迟、就诊延迟、确诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 53-56,60.
[9] 夏强, 刘海灿, 赵秀芹, 万康林, 赵丽丽. 结核分枝杆菌异烟肼与乙硫异烟胺交叉耐药的相关基因研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 836-841.
[10] 马志, 叶尔扎提·吾瓦特, 腾子豪, 蒋远东, 向阳. 2009—2020年伊宁市学生结核病就诊延迟情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 180-184.
[11] 腾子豪, 蒋远东, 王玥, 王艳杰, 樊晓蕾, 胡鹏远, 向阳. 新疆某职业院校新生结核潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1156-1160.
[12] 桑国鑫, 陈同, 车洋, 陈云鹏, 贺天锋. 宁波市结核分枝杆菌和艾滋病病毒双重感染筛查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1121-1124.
[13] 陈松华. 世界卫生组织关于新冠肺炎流行期间的结核病防控意见[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1187-1188.
[14] 郭海萍, 尚媛媛, 李姗姗, 逄宇. 全基因组测序在结核病分子流行病学研究中的应用[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 899-903.
[15] 陈馨仪,综述; 陈彬, 蒋健敏,审校. 移动信息技术在结核病患者治疗管理中的应用进展[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 583-587.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed