Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (10): 1066-1071    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.019
  卫生管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
上海市、区公共卫生应急队员应急处置能力评价指标体系构建
段春梅1, 龚刚1, 张妍1, 张书志1, 钟培松1, 黄晓燕2, 朱也凡1
1.上海市嘉定区疾病预防控制中心(上海市嘉定区卫生健康监督所),上海 201821;
2.上海市疾病预防控制中心,上海 201107
Construction of evaluation index system for emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai
DUAN Chunmei1, GONG Gang1, ZHANG Yan1, ZHANG Shuzhi1, ZHONG Peisong1, HUANG Xiaoyan2, ZHU Yefan1
1. Jiading District Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Jiading District Institute of Public Health Supervision), Shanghai 201821, China;
2. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201107, China
全文: PDF(861 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建上海市、区公共卫生应急队员应急处置能力评价指标体系,为应急队员能力评估与队伍建设提供工具。方法 通过文献检索、政策查阅和研究小组讨论初步建立上海市、区公共卫生应急队员应急处置能力评价指标体系框架。采用德尔菲法,邀请应急管理、疾病预防控制或公共卫生相关领域专家参与咨询,确定指标体系;采用专家积极系数、权威系数和协调程度评价咨询效果。采用层次分析法确定一、二级指标权重,采用百分权重法确定三级指标权重。结果 参与咨询专家20人,男性12人,女性8人;硕士及以上学历16人;工作年限为(16.50±5.24)年。2轮专家咨询问卷有效率分别为100.00%、95.00%,专家权威系数为0.86±0.07,肯德尔协调系数分别为0.161~0.247和0.314~0.585(均P<0.05)。构建的上海市、区公共卫生应急队员应急处置能力评价指标体系包括“应急准备能力”(0.193 1)、“监测预警能力”(0.263 9)、“应急处置能力”(0.392 3)和“应急恢复能力”(0.150 8)4个一级指标;15个二级指标中,“现场调查”(0.084 7)和“应急响应”(0.080 5)组合权重居前2位;59个三级指标包括共性指标42个、市级个性指标12个和区级个性指标5个。结论 本研究专家咨询具有较好的专家积极性和权威性,构建的评价指标体系兼顾上海市、区公共卫生应急队员的共性能力和差异化职能需求,可为上海市、区公共卫生应急队员的应急处置能力评价提供工具。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
段春梅
龚刚
张妍
张书志
钟培松
黄晓燕
朱也凡
关键词 : 公共卫生,  应急队员,  应急处置能力,  德尔菲法,  评价指标    
Abstract:Objective To construct an evaluation index system for emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai, so as to provide a tool for capability assessment and team building of emergency responders. Methods The framework of the evaluation indexe system for emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai were preliminarily established through literature retrieval, policy review and research group discussion. The Delphi method was used to invite experts in the fields of emergency management, disease prevention and control or public health to participate in the consultation, and the index system was determined. The quality of the consultation was evaluated using the expert positive coefficient, authority coefficient and degree of coordination. The analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of the first- and second-level indexes, and the percentage weight method was used to determine the weights of the third-level indexes. Results A total of 20 experts participated in the consultation, including 12 males and 8 females. Sixteen experts had a master's degree or above. The mean years of practice was (16.50±5.24) years. The response rates of the two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires were 100.00% and 95.00%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient was 0.86±0.07, and Kendall's coefficients of concordance were 0.161-0.247 and 0.314-0.585, respectively (all P<0.05). The constructed evaluation index system for emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai included 4 first-level indexes: "emergency preparedness capability" (0.193 1), "monitoring and early warning capability" (0.263 9), "emergency response capability" (0.392 3) and "emergency recovery capability" (0.150 8). Among the 15 second-level indexes, "on-site investigation" (0.084 7) and "emergency response" (0.080 5) ranked the top two in combined weight. Among the 59 third-level indexes, there were 42 common indexes, 12 municipal-level specific indexes and 5 district-level specific indexes. Conclusions The expert consultation in this study showed good expert positivity and authority. The constructed evaluation index system takes into account both the common capabilities and differentiated functional needs of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai, and can provide a tool for evaluating the emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai.
Key words: public health    emergency responder    emergency response capability    Delphi method    evaluation index
收稿日期: 2026-07-16      修回日期: 2026-09-21      出版日期: 2026-10-10
中图分类号:  R197.2  
基金资助:上海市卫生健康委员会2026年卫生健康行业发展课题(2026HP12); 上海市嘉定区卫生健康委科研立项项目(2023-KY-26)
作者简介: 段春梅,硕士,主管医师,主要从事卫生应急管理工作
通信作者: 黄晓燕,E-mail:huangxiaoyan@scdc.sh.cn   
引用本文:   
段春梅, 龚刚, 张妍, 张书志, 钟培松, 黄晓燕, 朱也凡. 上海市、区公共卫生应急队员应急处置能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(10): 1066-1071.
DUAN Chunmei, GONG Gang, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Shuzhi, ZHONG Peisong, HUANG Xiaoyan, ZHU Yefan. Construction of evaluation index system for emergency response capability of public health emergency responders at municipal and district levels in Shanghai. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(10): 1066-1071.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.019      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I10/1066
[1] 刘旭辉,王鑫,孙立前.应对突发公共卫生事件应急能力的思考与对策——以南京江北新区卫生应急能力培训为例[J].中华卫生应急电子杂志,2023,9(4):233-236.
[2] 焦敏,秘玉清,王镇德,等.中国疾控机构卫生应急能力评估现状分析[J].中国公共卫生,2023,39(1):62-67.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,中华人民共和国国家中医药管理局,中华人民共和国国家疾病预防控制局.关于印发国家卫生应急队伍管理办法的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-21].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202403/content_6941067.htm.
[4] 上海市卫生健康委员会.上海市人民政府办公厅关于转发市卫生健康委等四部门制订的《上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2020—2022年)》的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-21].https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/sh1/20200619/bf37c261cc7e4a80be242cf3aa2fca88.html.
[5] 上海市疾病预防控制局.关于印发上海市基层传染病应急队伍标准化建设方案的通知[Z].2024.
[6] 湖南省人民政府.应急管理概论(一)[EB/OL].[2026-09-21].https://www.hunan.gov.cn/hnszf/xxgk/yjgl/yjzs/201301/t20130108_4694722.html.
[7] 张妍,蒋泓,史慧静.应用Delphi法构建0~6岁儿童家长的健康素养评价指标体系[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(23):5809-5812.
[8] 任艳军,徐虹,金涛,等.应用德尔菲法构建大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系[J].预防医学,2025,37(6):567-572.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家疾病预防控制局,中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会,中华人民共和国财政部,等.关于印发疾病预防控制领域强基实施方案的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-21].https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100014/common/content/content_2015961597342027776.html.
[10] 李欣宇,陈勇,孙晓冬,等.上海区级疾病预防控制机构现代化建设思考与展望[J].中国卫生资源,2023,26(6):637-641.
[11] Li Z H,Wang X J,Bai W Q,et al.Construction of a competency evaluation indicator system for emergency response staff in disease control and prevention institutions-China,2023[J].China CDC Wkly,2024,6(49):1306-1312.
[12] 段云,刘敏,赵欣,等.四川省疾病预防控制机构专业人员突发公共卫生事件应急能力现况研究[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(11):2059-2064.
[13] 胡梦珏,冯莉莉,薛曹怡,等.不同层级的基层传染病应急队员岗位胜任力评价指标体系研究[J].山西医药杂志,2025,54(11):843-846.
[14] 闫东,刘冠纯,任兴宇,等.利用层次分析法和德尔菲法构建疾控机构鼠疫应急能力评价指标体系[J].中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(4):568-572.
[15] 李旭东,刘保峰,曾强,等.基于德尔菲法构建的天津市职业中毒事件应急能力评估指标体系[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2025,43(10):744-749.
[1] 孙琰婷, 傅颐, 梁宏涛, 潘一滨, 王琛, 陆金根. 应用德尔菲法构建1~3岁幼儿肛门功能评估量表[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 690-694.
[2] 何瑶, 章光明, 吴晓虹, 庞志峰. 2015—2024年金华市学校突发公共卫生事件特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 578-582.
[3] 任艳军, 徐虹, 金涛, 吕烨, 李朝康, 谭若云. 应用德尔菲法构建大气污染突发事件公共卫生风险评估指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 567-572.
[4] 周璇, 吴苗苗, 何以晴, 苏芳, 丁金霞, 谢伦芳. 德尔菲法构建宫颈癌防治素养评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 413-416,420.
[5] 王英杰, 孙高峰, 赵娥, 田原. 2017—2021年乌鲁木齐市2型糖尿病患者管理指标分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 92-95.
[6] 张涛, 杜治平, 王祚懿, 金屡华. 2014—2023年金华市突发公共卫生事件特征[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 69-72.
[7] 鲁琴宝, 吴昊澄, 吴晨, 傅天颖, 丁哲渊, 王心怡, 杨珂, 林君芬. 2023年浙江省突发公共卫生事件特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 487-490.
[8] 朱澜澜, 张钟, 卞增惠, 许阳婷, 孙红敏, 刘婷. 2017—2022年南京市水痘突发公共卫生事件的空间聚集特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 215-218.
[9] 岑琼, 蒋旸, 降菁月, 李晓菲, 向文静, 吕韵云. 应用德尔菲法构建儿童家长口腔健康素养评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 193-197.
[10] 高丽娟, 井淇, 郑文贵, 吴芳, 段明雪, 马安宁. 县级疾病预防控制中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 659-664.
[11] 张廷峰, 田梓璇, 宋华忠, 范艳存. 呼和浩特市基层公共卫生服务人员执业技能培训需求调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 485-490.
[12] 王智帆, 郭玲伶, 简伟研. 高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 401-405.
[13] 陈银炜, 周洋, 刘珍, 张晓辉. 流动人口HIV感染孕产妇健康综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 210-214.
[14] 李鹏, 吴文杰, 唐安, 李科峰, 严剑波. 2004—2021年舟山市突发公共卫生事件流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 144-147.
[15] 王心怡, 吴昊澄, 鲁琴宝, 丁哲渊, 傅天颖, 杨珂, 吴晨, 林君芬. 2012—2021年浙江省学校突发公共卫生事件及相关信息分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(9): 870-875.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed