Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2016, Vol. 28 Issue (4): 362-367    
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
术前外周血NLR和d-NLR水平与结直肠癌手术患者预后的相关性研究
崔莹珊1, 陈小林2, 周航亮3, 张瑞光4
1.金华市中心医院放疗科,浙江 金华 321037;
2.萍乡市人民医院;
3.东阳市横店集团医院;
4.华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院肿瘤中心
A study on the association between preoperative NLR and d-NLR and clinical outcome of postoperative colorectal cancer patient
CUI Ying-shan, CHEN Xiao-lin, ZHOU Hang-liang, ZHANG Rui-guang
Radiotherapy Department of Jinghua Central Hospital, Jinhua,Zhejiang, 321037,China
全文: PDF(980 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨术前外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与派生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(d-NLR)对评估结直肠癌(CRC)手术患者预后的价值。方法 收集555例CRC根治性切除手术患者临床病理资料,并对其进行5年随访;利用ROC曲线确定NLR和d-NLR的cut-off值,Kaplan-Meier曲线和多重Cox回归分析NLR、d-NLR与CRC术后患者预后的关系,并构建临床预后预测列线图评价预测价值。结果 以总生存期为判断终点,NLR(灵敏度=0.752,特异度=0.753,AUC=0.762)与d-NLR(灵敏度=0.721,特异度=0.683,AUC=0.720)的cut-off值分别为3.21和2.12;Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,术前NLR、d-NLR与CRC术后患者的无复发生存期和总生存期相关(P<0.01);多因素COX回归分析显示,NLR和d-NLR水平高是判断CRC术后患者无复发生存期(HRNLR=2.53,HRd-NLR=1.60)和总生存期(HRNLR=2.75,HRd-NLR=2.11)的独立预测因子;按包含与未包含NLR、d-NLR两因子分别构建无复发生存期和总生存期预测列线图,其C指数分别为0.851、0.836和0.801、0.793。结论 术前NLR和d-NLR水平高则CRC术后患者无复发生存期和总生存期明显缩短;术前NLR和d-NLR可作为评估肿瘤II~III期CRC患者术后无复发生存期和总生存期的独立预后因子。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
崔莹珊
陈小林
周航亮
张瑞光
关键词 结直肠癌NLRd-NLR预测列线图相关性    
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer (CRC) individuals. MethodsThe clinical pathological data and preoperative blood routine test results were collected from medical records, and 5 year follow up was performed in a total of 555 surgically resected CRC cases. Receiver operative curve (ROC) was used to calculate NLR and d-NLR cut-off value, and Kaplan-Meier curve and multiple COX regression were selected to evaluate the influence of preoperative NLR and d-NLR on clinical outcome of CRC cases and prognostic predictive nomogram was established to evaluate the predictive value of NLR and d-NLR. ResultsUsing overall survival (OS) as an endpoint, the optimal cut-off values of NLR and d-NLR were 3.21 (Sensitivity=0.752, specificity=0.753, AUC=0.762) and 2.12 (sensitivity=0.721, specificity=0.683, AUC=0.720), respectively. Preoperative NLR and d-NLR were significantly associated with free-recurrent survival (RFS) and OS(P<0.01). NLR and d-NLR were independent factors for prediction of RFS (HRNLR =2.53, HRd-NLR=1.60) and OS (HRNLR=2.75, HRd-NLR=2.11) in II-III stage preoperative CRC patients. The C-indexes of RFS and OS predictive nomograms including NLR and d-NLR were 0.851 and 0.836, and C-indexes without NLR and d-NLR were 0.801 and 0.793, respectively. ConclusionThis results indicated that RFS and OS of the patients with preoperative high NLR and d-NLR were significantly shorter than those with relative low NLR and d-NLR, and they were independent prognostic predictive factors for RFS and OS, and nomograms including NLR and d-NLR could significantly improve the prognostic predictive efficacy in postoperative CRC individuals.
Key wordsCRC    NLR    d-NLR    Nomogram    Associatiom
收稿日期: 2015-09-22      修回日期: 2015-11-12      出版日期: 2016-04-10
中图分类号:  R135.3  
作者简介: 崔莹珊,硕士,医师,主要从事常见肿瘤诊治工作
通信作者: 崔莹珊,E-mail:cuiyingshan@yeah.net   
引用本文:   
崔莹珊, 陈小林, 周航亮, 张瑞光. 术前外周血NLR和d-NLR水平与结直肠癌手术患者预后的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(4): 362-367.
CUI Ying-shan, CHEN Xiao-lin, ZHOU Hang-liang, ZHANG Rui-guang. A study on the association between preoperative NLR and d-NLR and clinical outcome of postoperative colorectal cancer patient. Preventive Medicine, 2016, 28(4): 362-367.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2016/V28/I4/362
[1] CANDIDO J, HAGEMANN T. Cancer-related inflammation[J]. J Clin Immunol,2013, 33(Suppl 1): S79-84.
[2] GO S I, LEE A, LEE U S, et al. Clinical significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in venous thromboembolism patients with lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer,2014, 84(1): 79-85.
[3] KILINCALP S, COBAN S, AKINCI H, et al. Neutrophil/[CM)]lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume as potential biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of colorectal adenocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Cancer Prev,2015,24(4): 328-333.
[4] DIRICAN A, KUCUKZEYBEK B B, ALACACIOGLU A, et al. Do the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predict prognosis in breast cancer?[J]. Int J Clin Oncol,2015, 20(1):70-81.
[5] MALIETZIS G, GIACOMETTI M, ASKARI A, et al. Apreoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 predicts disease-free survival after curative elective colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(2):287-292.
[6] SZKANDERA J, GERGER A, LIEGL-ATZWANGER B, et al. The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome and improves the predictive accuracy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas[J]. Int J Cancer,2014, 135(2):362-370.
[7] ULICH T R, DEL CASTILLO J, KEYS M, et al. Kinetics and mechanisms of recombinant human interleukin 1 and tumor necrosisfactor-alpha- induced changes in circulating numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes[J]. J Immunol,1987, 139(10): 3406-3415.
[8] 丁燕, 南娟, 刘谦. 慢性炎症、肿瘤微环境与癌变[J].中国肺癌杂志,2009, 12(9): 1022-1030.
[9] GRAZIOSI L, MARINO E, DE ANGELIS V, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio in patients resected for gastric cancer[J]. Am J Surg,2015, 209(2) :333-337.
[10] CEDRÉS S, TORREJON D, MARTÍNEZ A,et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Transl Oncol,2012, 14(11): 864-869.
[11] GAO F, LI X, GENG M, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-[CM)]lymphocyte ratio: an independent predictor of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2015, 94(11):e639.
[12] AZAB B, MOHAMMAD F, SHAH N, et al. The value of the pretreatment neutrophil lymphocyte ratio vs. platelet lymphocyte ratio in predicting the long-term survival in colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Biomark,2014, 14(5):303-312.
[13] WEITZMAN S A, GORDON L I. Inflammation and cancer: role of phagocyte-generated oxidants in carcinogenesis[J]. Blood,1990,76(4): 655-663.
[14] 朱元民,刘玉兰. 感染、炎症与肿瘤的发生[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2013,22(2): 105-108.
[15] 王从玉,邓跃华,刘弋,等. nm23 VE6F-C及VEGFR-3在大肠癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2008,35(9): 1117-1121.
[16] KIM S L, LEE S T, TRANG K T, et al. Parthenolide exerts inhibitory effects on angiogenesis through the down regulation of VEGF/VEGFRs in colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Mol Med,2014, 33(5): 1261-1267.
[17] MENGES T, ENGEL J, WELTERS I, et al. Changes in blood lymphocyte populations after multiple trauma: association with posttraumatic complications[J]. Crit Care Med,1999,27(4): 733-740.
[1] 周凡, 王小红, 陈梦倩, 张小兰, 徐则林. 2016—2027年金华市结直肠癌发病和死亡趋势分析及预测[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 26-30.
[2] 李玉荣, 王冬飞, 高媛媛, 蒋园园, 林君英, 肖段段. 2010—2024年萧山区结直肠癌发病趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 927-931,936.
[3] 张莹, 陈伊绚, 高玥, 王晔, 李剑森, 韩毓桐, 魏文强, 廖羽. 2020年广东省肿瘤登记地区结直肠癌流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 997-1001.
[4] 陈铭睿, 林玲, 楚楚, 黄捷, 韩亚蓉, 蔡波, 韩颖颖. 2013—2022年南通市结直肠癌发病和死亡趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1039-1044.
[5] 蒋鸣孝, 李剑, 黄旭云. 上城区结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 501-505.
[6] 和金金, 朱陈, 潘婷婷, 黄文雯, 蒋秉洁, 余炜燕, 王乐, 吴维妙, 杭栋, 杜灵彬. 定性和定量粪便免疫化学试验筛查结直肠癌效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 317-321.
[7] 陈淑淑, 龚巍巍, 关云琦, 周晓燕, 潘劲, 戴品远, 王浩, 李娜, 俞敏. 1990—2019年浙江省结直肠癌疾病负担和危险因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 203-206.
[8] 高菡璐, 俞晓芳, 吕乐彬, 叶国良, 樊金卿. 多靶点粪便DNA、肠道菌群、癌胚抗原及水果摄入对结直肠癌风险的交互作用研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 219-223.
[9] 沈方力, 茅俭英, 孟杨, 朱礼明, 柏红, 汤德珍, 刘世友. 宝山区居民结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 869-872,877.
[10] 曾龙武, 唐晓鸿, 张素霞, 刘强, 梁朝聪, 唐漫漫. 结直肠癌化疗患者照护人疾病不确定感影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 444-447.
[11] 吕乐彬, 樊金卿, 赵王芳, 陆启文, 顾俊娣, 高菡璐. 肠镜检查人群多靶点粪便DNA检测意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 218-223.
[12] 杭文璐, 武琦, 李婉君, 薄芸, 周贤梅. SiO2对大鼠气道表面微环境和NEK7/NLRP3炎性小体的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 180-184.
[13] 郑沛, 卢丽微, 朱福乾, 戴曙杰. 永嘉县结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 727-731.
[14] 倪卫桂, 余勇, 谢悦, 汪敬轩, 陈婷婷, 杨春霞. 成都市结直肠癌患者抑郁症状的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 147-150.
[15] 张晓海, 施惠娟, 张洪涛, 钟华, 姚敏, 谭又吉. 麻风病治愈患者结直肠癌及癌前病变的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(12): 1257-1261.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed