Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (9): 932-936    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.09.015
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
小学生近视综合防控干预效果评价
王浏瑛1,2, 田蒙珂3, 郭伟全4, 段香星2, 王佳龙2, 云丽娜1,2
1.内蒙古医科大学蒙医临床医学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010059;
2.内蒙古自治区国际蒙医医院,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010010;
3.清华大学万科公共卫生与健康学院,北京 100084;
4.呼和浩特市近视防控协会,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010020
Effect of comprehensive myopia prevention and control among primary school students
WANG Liuying1,2, TIAN Mengke3, GUO Weiquan4, DUAN Xiangxing2, WANG Jialong2, YUN Lina1,2
1. Mongolian Medicine Clinical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010059, China;
2. Inner Mongolia International Hospital of Mongolian Medicine, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
3. Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
4. Hohhot Myopia Prevention and Control Association, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010020, China
全文: PDF(880 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价小学生近视综合防控干预效果,为学校开展近视学生综合防控提供依据。方法 于2023年9月,采用分层随机抽样方法抽取呼和浩特市锡林南路小学6~11岁近视学生为研究对象,随机分为干预组和对照组。对照组接受学校常规管理,并给予常规屈光矫正;干预组在对照组的基础上实施涵盖健康教育、用眼行为管理、视觉环境改善、重复低强度红光治疗和耳穴按压等近视综合防控干预措施,干预周期12个月。通过问卷调查、眼科检查收集基本信息、用眼行为和眼科检查指标,采用广义估计方程分析两组近视小学生干预前后用眼行为差异,采用线性混合效应模型分析眼轴长度(AL)、等效球镜度(SE)和裸眼视力(UCVA)差异。结果 对照组52人,男生25人,女生27人,年龄为(7.94±0.94)岁;干预组52人,男生27人,女生25人,年龄为(7.88±0.92)岁。两组近视小学生性别、年龄、AL、SE和UCVA等基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组近视小学生电子屏幕使用时间达标率和户外活动时间达标率的组间与时间存在交互效应(均P<0.05);干预后,干预组电子屏幕使用时间达标率、户外活动时间达标率分别为51.92%、69.23%,高于对照组的28.85%、50.00%。两组近视小学生AL、SE和UCVA的组间与时间存在交互效应(均P<0.05);干预后,干预组AL增长0.17 mm,低于对照组的0.34 mm;SE、UCVA下降分别为0.12 D、0.03,低于对照组的0.42 D、0.12。结论 近视综合防控措施对小学生近视防控具有干预效果,可减缓眼轴增长和屈光状态进展,并改善裸眼视力和部分用眼行为。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王浏瑛
田蒙珂
郭伟全
段香星
王佳龙
云丽娜
关键词 : 近视,  综合防控,  眼轴长度,  等效球镜度,  裸眼视力    
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of comprehensive prevention and control interventions for myopia among primary school students, so as to provide evidence for the comprehensive prevention and control of myopia among myopic students in schools. Methods In September 2023, myopic students aged 6 to 11 years from Xilin South Road Primary School in Hohhot City were selected as research subjects by stratified random sampling method, and randomly divided into intervention group and control group. The control group received routine school management and conventional refractive correction. On the basis of routine care for the control group, the intervention group received comprehensive myopia prevention and control interventions covering health education, eye use behavior management, visual environment improvement, repeated low-level red-light therapy and auricular point pressing, with an intervention period of 12 months. Basic information, eye use behaviors and ophthalmic examination indicators were collected through questionnaire survey and ophthalmic examination. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the differences in eye use behaviors between the two groups of myopic primary school students before and after intervention, and linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze the differences in axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Results The control group included 52 students, including 25 boys and 27 girls, with an average age of (7.94±0.94) years. The intervention group included 52 students, including 27 boys and 25 girls, with an average age of (7.88±0.92) years. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as gender, age, AL, SE and UCVA between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were statistically significant interaction effects between group and time on the compliance rate of screen time and outdoor activity time in the two groups (both P<0.05). After intervention, the compliance rates of screen time and outdoor activity time in the intervention group were higher than in the control group (51.92% vs. 28.85%, 69.23% vs. 50.00%). There were statistically significant interaction effects between group and time on AL, SE and UCVA (all P<0.05). After intervention, the AL increase was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (0.17 mm vs. 0.34 mm), the decreases in SE and UCVA were lower in the intervention group than in the control group (0.12 D vs. 0.42 D, 0.03 vs. 0.12). Conclusion The comprehensive myopia prevention and control measures have intervention effects on myopia prevention and control among primary school students, which can slow down the axial elongation and the progression of refractive status, and improve uncorrected visual acuity and some eye use behaviors.
Key words: myopia    comprehensive prevention and control    axial length    spherical equivalent    uncorrected visual acuity
收稿日期: 2026-05-06      修回日期: 2026-09-04     
中图分类号:  R179  
基金资助:内蒙古自治区卫生健康科技计划项目(202201158)
作者简介: 王浏瑛,硕士,医师,主要从事学校卫生工作
通信作者: 云丽娜,E-mail:dryunlina@126.com   
引用本文:   
王浏瑛, 田蒙珂, 郭伟全, 段香星, 王佳龙, 云丽娜. 小学生近视综合防控干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(9): 932-936.
WANG Liuying, TIAN Mengke, GUO Weiquan, DUAN Xiangxing, WANG Jialong, YUN Lina. Effect of comprehensive myopia prevention and control among primary school students. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(9): 932-936.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.09.015      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I9/932
[1] 中华人民共和国国家疾病预防控制局.国家疾控局积极推进儿童青少年近视防控近视率呈下降趋势[EB/OL].[2026-09-04].https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100008/common/content/content_1764617954927783936.html.
[2] 李国峰,张秀红,杨田,等.2019—2021年内蒙古自治区儿童青少年近视流行趋势曲线模型分析[J].中国健康教育,2023,39(11):973-977.
[3] Morgan I G,Ohno-Matsui K,Saw S M.Myopia[J].Lancet,2012,379(9827):1739-1748.
[4] 王竹章,沈月平.儿童和青少年近视控制方法的研究进展[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志(中英文),2025,27(8):629-634.
[5] Wang Y M,Lu S Y,Zhang X J,et al.Myopia genetics and heredity[J/OL].Children(Basel),2022,9(3)[2026-09-04].https://doi.org/10.3390/children9030382.
[6] Haarman A E G,Enthoven C A,Tideman J W L,et al.The complications of myopia:a review and meta-analysis[J/OL].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2020,61(4)[2026-09-04].https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.4.49.
[7] 李国峰,张秀红,魏娜娜,等.内蒙古自治区儿童青少年2019—2021年近视流行状况[J].中国学校卫生,2023,44(7):1076-1079,1083.
[8] Rosenfield M.Computer vision syndrome:a review of ocular causes and potential treatments[J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2011,31(5):502-515.
[9] 中华中医药学会眼科分会.中医药防控儿童青少年近视指南(社区医生与校医版)[J].中国中医眼科杂志,2021,31(7):461-465.
[10] Wolffsohn J S,Kollbaum P S,Berntsen D A,et al.IMI-clinical myopia control trials and instrumentation report[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2019,60(3):132-160.
[11] 张锡彦,许继民,苗升浩,等.线上线下近视防控健康教育对小学生干预效果评估[J].中国学校卫生,2023,44(11):1720-1723,1728.
[12] He X G,Wang J J,Zhu Z T,et al.Effect of repeated low-level red light on myopia prevention among children in China with premyopia:a randomized clinical trial[J/OL].JAMA Netw Open,2023[2026-09-04].https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9612.
[13] Jiang Y,Zhu Z T,Tan X P,et al.Effect of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia control in children:a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J].Ophthalmology,2022,129(5):509-519.
[14] Gao H X,Zhang L,Liu J H.Auricular acupressure for myopia in children and adolescents:a systematic review[J/OL].Complement Ther Clin Pract,2020,38[2026-09-04].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.101067.
[15] Wu P C,Chen C T,Lin K K,et al.Myopia prevention and outdoor light intensity in a school-based cluster randomized trial[J].Ophthalmology,2018,125(8):1239-1250.
[16] Li Q,Guo L,Zhang J Y,et al.Effect of school-based family health education via social media on children's myopia and parents'awareness:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Ophthalmol,2021,139(11):1165-1172.
[17] 李小勇,孙强, 龚清海. 鄞州区中小学生行为生活方式对近视影响的潜在类别分析[J].预防医学,2023,35(12):1043-1047,1052.
[18] 王子睿,张祥,刘煜,等. 中小学生脊柱弯曲异常与筛查性近视共患现况调查[J].预防医学,2025,37(4):336-340.
[19] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发近视防治指南(2024年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-04].https://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/c100068/202405/8536cb2bb0f5480ab345be7ebf7502ea.shtml.
[1] 杨艳, 马倩倩, 黄莹, 张松杰, 王燕波. 西安市儿童青少年近视及增长速度分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(9): 870-874.
[2] 邢超, 黄炯杰, 任蒋磊, 王琦梅, 章建伟. 绍兴市中小学生常见病共病调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(9): 927-931.
[3] 王芸, 申赟魁, 刘博昊, 陈静, 张琨. 延庆区中小学生近视与超重肥胖共患现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 85-88.
[4] 王子睿, 张祥, 刘煜, 周潇潇. 中小学生脊柱弯曲异常与筛查性近视共患现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 336-340.
[5] 高帆, 王玉红, 顾一楠, 包旭艳, 徐秋叶. 近视儿童视觉训练效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 776-780.
[6] 李小勇, 孙强, 龚清海. 鄞州区中小学生行为生活方式对近视影响的潜在类别分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1043-1047, 1052.
[7] 俞丹丹, 孙重秀, 李晨晨, 韩东方, 马瑞鸿, 王丽华. 金山区小学生家庭用眼卫生调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1181-1186.
[8] 周娓, 吴锋, 元国平. 江北区中学生用眼行为现状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 689-693.
[9] 黄滟, 高锦凤, 杜涛, 朱彦锋, 余小平. 天全县高中学生视频显示终端综合征的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 514-518.
[10] 高华, 易波, 张琰, 蒋丹捷, 史碧君, 周绍英, 郭延波. 宁波市初中学生近视流行现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 522-525,528.
[11] 胡佳, 丁子尧, 韩迪, 海波, 尹洁云, 沈蕙. 苏州市中小学生近视的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 241-245.
[12] 何娟, 蒋丹丹, 林瑶瑶, 肖海哨, 刘倩, 陈燕燕. 中高度近视学生心理健康与视觉相关生活质量的关系[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(2): 117-120.
[13] 周红亮, 荣晓夙, 李虎. 阿克苏地区学生常见病监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(2): 197-199,203.
[14] 李强强, 王悦, 郑康杰. 6~18岁儿童眼部屈光度、眼轴长度和角膜曲率分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 917-919.
[15] 黄坤, 综述, 李秀红, 审校. 青少年近视影响因素及机制研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 578-582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed