Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (7): 695-698    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.07.011
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
天津市严重急性呼吸道感染病例病原体感染特征
刘小畅1, 郭丽茹1, 杨杰1, 吴明琨1, 孔梅1, 张芃1, 李晓燕1,2
1.天津市疾病预防控制中心,天津 300011;
2.天津医科大学公共卫生学院,天津 300070
Characteristics of pathogens among severe acute respiratory infection cases in Tianjin Municipality
LIU Xiaochang1, GUO Liru1, YANG Jie1, WU Mingkun1, KONG Mei1, ZHANG Peng1, LI Xiaoyan1,2
1. Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin 300011, China;
2. School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
全文: PDF(808 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析天津市严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)病例病原体感染特征,为制定SARI区域性防控策略提供依据。方法 于2024年1月—2025年12月,采集天津市6家呼吸道病原体监测哨点医院SARI病例的痰液或咽拭子样本,采用呼吸道病原体核酸多重实时荧光PCR检测试剂盒检测14种SARI病原体。描述性分析14种病原体的检出情况,以及时间和年龄分布特征。结果 采集3 402份样本,检出病原体阳性样本1 456份,阳性检出率为42.80%。10—12月检出阳性样本较多,分别为205、232和274份,阳性检出率为38.90%、44.87%和51.02%。肺炎支原体、流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌阳性检出率居前3位,分别为10.58%、9.88%和6.61%。单一感染阳性检出率居前3位的病原体依次为肺炎支原体、甲型流感病毒和流感嗜血杆菌,混合感染阳性检出率居前4位的病原体组合依次为流感嗜血杆菌+肺炎支原体、流感嗜血杆菌+肺炎链球菌、呼吸道合胞病毒+肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌+甲型流感病毒。0~<6岁、6~<18岁SARI病例病原体阳性检出率较高,分别为61.14%、59.97%。结论 天津市SARI病例病原体以肺炎支原体、流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌感染为主,秋冬季、0~<18岁人群病原体感染风险较高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘小畅
郭丽茹
杨杰
吴明琨
孔梅
张芃
李晓燕
关键词 严重急性呼吸道感染肺炎支原体流感嗜血杆菌肺炎链球菌特征    
AbstractObjective To analyze the infection characteristics of pathogens among cases with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) in Tianjin Municipality, so as to provide the evidence for developing regional SARI prevention and control strategies. Methods Sputum or throat swab specimens were collected from SARI cases at six sentinel hospitals for respiratory pathogen surveillance in Tianjin Municipality from January 2024 to December 2025. A multiplex real-time PCR nucleic acid detection kit for respiratory pathogens was used to detect 14 types of SARI pathogens. Descriptive analysis was conducted to explore pathogen detection status, as well as temporal and age distribution characteristics. Results A total of 3 402 specimens were collected, with 1 456 pathogen-positive samples and positive detection rate of 42.80%. More positive samples were detected from October to December, with 205, 232 and 274 positive samples accounting for 38.90%, 44.87% and 51.02%, respectively. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae had relatively high positive detection rates of 10.58%, 9.88% and 6.61%, respectively. The top three pathogens ranked by positive detection rate for single infection were Mycoplasma pneumoniae, influenza A virus and Haemophilus influenzae, while the top four pathogen combinations ranked by positive detection rate for mixed infection were Haemophilus influenzae combined with Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae combined with Streptococcus pneumoniae, respiratory syncytial virus combined with Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae combined with influenza A virus. The 0-<6 years and 6-<18 years age groups exhibited relatively high pathogen positive detection rates of 61.14% and 59.97%, respectively. Conclusions The predominant pathogens among SARI patients in Tianjin Municipality were Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. The risk of pathogen infection was higher in autumn and winter and among population aged 0-<18 years.
Key wordssevere acute respiratory infection    Mycoplasma pneumoniae    Haemophilus influenzae    Streptococcus pneumoniae    characteristics
收稿日期: 2026-02-27      修回日期: 2026-05-26      出版日期: 2026-07-10
中图分类号:  R183.3  
基金资助:天津市科技计划项目(25ZYCGSY01350);天津市医学重点发展学科—流行病学(传染病预防与控制)(TJYXZDXK-3-004D)
作者简介: 刘小畅,硕士,实习研究员,主要从事病原检测工作
通信作者: 李晓燕,E-mail:xiaoyanli1291@163.com   
引用本文:   
刘小畅, 郭丽茹, 杨杰, 吴明琨, 孔梅, 张芃, 李晓燕. 天津市严重急性呼吸道感染病例病原体感染特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 695-698.
LIU Xiaochang, GUO Liru, YANG Jie, WU Mingkun, KONG Mei, ZHANG Peng, LI Xiaoyan. Characteristics of pathogens among severe acute respiratory infection cases in Tianjin Municipality. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(7): 695-698.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.07.011      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I7/695
[1] World Health Organization.Global epidemiological surveillance standards for influenza[M].Geneva:WHO,2014.
[2] GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators.Estimates of the global,regional,and national morbidity,mortality,and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in 195 countries,1990-2016:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2018,18(11):1191-1210.
[3] Nair H,Nokes D J,Gessner B D,et al.Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Lancet,2010,375(9725):1545-1555.
[4] Li Z J,Zhang H Y,Ren L L,et al.Etiological and epidemiological features of acute respiratory infections in China[J/OL].Nat Commun,2021,12[2026-05-26].http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25120-6.
[5] Ruuskanen O,Lahti E,Jennings L C,et al.Viral pneumonia[J].Lancet,2011,377(9773):1264-1275.
[6] 范佳鑫,夏汝杰,周晓梅,等.2024—2025年成都某医院急性呼吸道感染主要病原体的流行病学特征[J].临床荟萃,2025,40(7):602-607.
[7] 尤凤凤,施新焕,刘泽芬,等.2022—2024年大理州某医院急性呼吸道感染病原体流行特征[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2026,36(5):784-789.
[8] 蒋惟,陈火英,胡航宇,等.2023—2024年桂北地区某医院急性呼吸道感染病原体流行特征分析[J].疾病预防控制通报,2025,40(6):42-48.
[9] 杜青青,雷霞,姜晓峰,等.2023—2024年内蒙古自治区急性呼吸道病原体流行病学特征分析[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2025,48(5):530-535.
[10] 孙娜娜,宋明辉,谢江,等.2023—2025年三亚地区某医院七种呼吸道病原体检测及流行病学特征[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2026,36(1):89-93.
[11] Du H,Li J,et al.Respiratory pathogen profiles of patients:Beijing municipality,China,November 2023-April 2024[J].China CDC Wkly,2025,7(4):113-120.
[12] Lowen A C,Mubareka S,Steel J,et al.Influenza virus transmission is dependent on relative humidity and temperature[J].PLoS Pathog,2007,3(10):1470-1476.
[13] Shaman J,Pitzer V E,Viboud C,et al.Absolute humidity and the seasonal onset of influenza in the continental United States[J/OL].PLoS Biol,2010,8(2)[2026-05-26].http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000316.
[14] Waites K B,Talkington D F.Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen[J].Clin Microbiol Rev,2004,17(4):697-728.
[15] Williams D J,Shah S S.Community-acquired pneumonia in the conjugate vaccine era[J].J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc,2012,1(4):314-328.
[16] Li Y,Wang X,Blau D M,et al.Global,regional,and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019:a systematic analysis[J].Lancet,2022,399(10340):2047-2064.
[17] 杨艳娜,李敏,杨阳,等.一起学校肺炎支原体P1-Ⅱ型感染暴发疫情的流行病学调查[J].预防医学,2024,36(4):342-344.
[1] 李卫丹, 唐慧玲, 金屡华, 朱凯强, 陈依娜. 2015—2024年金华市淋病流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 722-725.
[2] 孙宇, 刘佳丽, 苗雨阳, 曹琳, 何美琪, 周强. 2015—2025年徐州市流行性腮腺炎流行特征和时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 731-734.
[3] 朱跃蒙, 倪朝荣, 谢华森, 李晓伟, 余向华, 黄洁茹. 2015—2025年温州市其他感染性腹泻流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 703-705,710.
[4] 胡蔡松, 余向华, 魏晶娇, 高豪俊, 李万仓, 王冰倩, 叶振淼. 2012—2024年温州市水痘流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(7): 711-713.
[5] 唐慧玲, 陈依娜, 朱凯强, 李卫丹, 张子根, 陈高尚. 2016—2025年金华市流动人口肺结核流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 541-544.
[6] 何继东, 黄勇, 张宇, 李婷, 张辉望, 姚寒砺, 栾荣生. 2011—2024年眉山市肺结核流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 555-558.
[7] 姚学君, 陈国清, 徐士林, 李长城. 1996—2024年柯萨奇病毒A组4型VP1区基因特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 622-625.
[8] 孙宏瑜, 吕玉梦, 王晨, 王丹彤, 陶旭. 2015—2024年秦皇岛市布鲁氏菌病流行特征和时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 635-638.
[9] 何瑶, 章光明, 吴晓虹, 庞志峰. 2015—2024年金华市学校突发公共卫生事件特征[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 578-582.
[10] 郭诗, 赵林, 陈枭, 罗琳, 余丹. 2016—2025年南充市流行性感冒流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 513-516,522.
[11] 吕恭进, 杨辰, 杨扬, 申屠平平. 金华市食源性疾病病例沙门菌感染特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 532-535,540.
[12] 冯豪, 李广辉, 田阳阳, 葛锐. 2015—2024年嘉兴市生殖道沙眼衣原体感染流行特征及趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 493-497.
[13] 朱列波, 叶蓁, 冯霞燕, 蒋君. 2015—2024年义乌市输入性疟疾病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 406-409.
[14] 张涛, 胡跃强, 章光明, 杜治平, 王祚懿, 王俊玲. 2010—2024年金华市输入性疟疾病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 398-401.
[15] 陈同, 王奕楠, 张栋梁, 贺天锋, 陈云鹏. 2015—2024年宁波市肺外结核流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 348-351.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed