Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (7): 687-691    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.07.009
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者呼吸康复干预效果评价
胡锦秀, 方婷婷, 张小敏, 张卉
安徽医科大学第一附属医院,安徽 合肥 230088
Effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation intervention in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer
HU Jinxiu, FANG Tingting, ZHANG Xiaomin, ZHANG Hui
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230088, China
全文: PDF(894 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价以问题为导向的呼吸康复护理对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者术后肺功能、活动能力、住院时间和胸腔闭式引流管留置时间的影响,为改善肺癌手术患者预后提供依据。方法 选择2023年10月—2024年6月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院行胸腔镜下肺癌根治术治疗的119例肺癌患者为研究对象,随机纳入对照组和干预组。对照组予以胸外科常规呼吸康复护理,干预组在此基础上实施以问题为导向的呼吸康复护理;于术前1 d和术后3 d测量第一秒用力呼吸容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)评估肺功能,测量6 min步行距离(6MWD)评价活动能力;通过医院电子病历收集两组患者术后并发症发生情况、住院时间和胸腔闭式引流管留置时间;采用重复测量资料的方差分析、log-rank检验比较两组干预效果。结果 对照组60例,年龄为(60.77±9.31)岁;男性28例,女性32例;鳞癌4例,腺癌55例,小细胞癌1例;肿瘤位于右侧肺叶41例。干预组59例,年龄为(58.71±10.01)岁;男性23例,女性36例;鳞癌2例,腺癌56例,小细胞癌1例;肿瘤位于右侧肺叶37例。两组患者年龄、性别、文化程度、病理类型和肿瘤位置比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后3 d,两组患者FEV1、FVC和6MWD组间与时间存在交互效应,干预组FEV1和6MWD高于对照组(均P<0.05),FVC组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组术后发生并发症3例,干预组未发生并发症。Log-rank检验结果显示,干预组术后住院时间、胸腔闭式引流管留置时间较对照组短(均P<0.05)。结论 以问题为导向的呼吸康复护理可改善肺癌术后患者的肺功能和活动能力,缩短住院时间和胸腔闭式引流管留置时间,提高患者生活质量。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
胡锦秀
方婷婷
张小敏
张卉
关键词 肺癌呼吸康复第一秒用力呼吸容积用力肺活量    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effects of problem-oriented respiratory rehabilitation nursing on lung function, activity ability, length of hospital stay, and retention time of closed chest drainage tube in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer, so as to provide a basis for improving the prognosis of patients with lung cancer surgery. Methods A total of 119 patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2023 to June 2024 were selected and randomly divided into the intervention group (n=59) and the control group (n=60). The control group received routine respiratory rehabilitation nursing of thoracic surgery. On the basis of the treatment and guidance received by the control group, the intervention group implemented problem-oriented respiratory rehabilitation nursing. First second expiratory volume (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were used to evaluate pulmonary function at 1 day before surgery and 3 days after surgery, and the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was used to evaluate physical activity. The incidence of pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay and retention time of closed chest drainage tube were collected through the hospital's electronic medical records system. The intervention effects between the two groups were compared using variance analysis of repeated-measures analysis of variance and log-rank test. Results The mean age of the control group was (60.77±9.31) years, with 28 males and 32 females. There were 4 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 55 cases of adenocarcinoma, and 1 case of small cell carcinoma. The tumors were located in the right lobe in 41 cases. The mean age of the intervention group was (58.71±10.01) years, with 23 males and 36 females. There were 2 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 56 cases of adenocarcinoma, and 1 case of small cell carcinoma. The tumors were located in the right lobe in 37 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, education level, pathological type, and tumor location between the two groups (all P>0.05). Three days after surgery, there was an interaction effect between the group and the time in FEV1, FVC, and 6MWD between the two groups. The FEV1 and 6MWD in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (both P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in FVC between the groups (P>0.05). There were 3 cases of postoperative complications in the control group, and no cases in the intervention group. Log-rank test showed that the length of hospital stay and retention time of closed chest drainage tube after surgery in the intervention group were shorter than those in the control group (both P<0.05). Conclusion The problem-oriented respiratory rehabilitation nursing can improve the lung function and activity ability of patients with lung cancer after surgery, shorten the length of hospital stay and retention time of closed chest drainage tube, and improve the quality of life.
Key wordslung cancer    respiratory rehabilitation    first second expiratory volume    forced vital capacity
收稿日期: 2024-12-05      修回日期: 2025-06-09      出版日期: 2025-07-10
中图分类号:  R734.2  
基金资助:中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2023M740027); 安徽自然科学研究重点项目(2022AH051150)
作者简介: 胡锦秀,硕士,副主任护师,主要从事护理管理、外科临床护理工作,E-mail:2373533868@qq.com
引用本文:   
胡锦秀, 方婷婷, 张小敏, 张卉. 胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者呼吸康复干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 687-691.
HU Jinxiu, FANG Tingting, ZHANG Xiaomin, ZHANG Hui. Effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation intervention in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for lung cancer. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(7): 687-691.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.07.009      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I7/687
[1] 郑荣寿,陈茹,韩冰峰,等.2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2024,46(3):221-231.
ZHENG R S,CHEN R,HAN B F,et al.Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2022[J].Chin J Oncol,2024,46(3):221-231.(in Chinese)
[2] 魏周斌,赵亮,张俣,等.胸腔镜肺楔形切除术与胸腔镜肺叶切除加纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床效果比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(5):919-922.
WEI Z B,ZHAO L,ZHANG Y,et al.Comparison of the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection and thoracoscopic lobectomy plus mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer[J].Prog Mod Biomed,2020,20(5):919-922.(in Chinese)
[3] EDBROOKE L,GRANGER C L,DENEHY L.Physical activity for people with lung cancer[J].Aust J Gen Pract,2020,49(4):175-181.
[4] 乔亚欣,杨慧,陈瑞云,等.肺癌术后患者运动康复依从性管理策略的研究进展[J].护理与康复,2023,22(11):94-98.
QIAO Y X,YANG H,CHEN R Y,et al.Progress of research on strategies for managing adherence to exercise rehabilitation in postoperative lung cancer patients[J].J Nurs Rehabil,2023,22(11):94-98.(in Chinese)
[5] MCCARRON E P,BAILEY M,LEONARD B,et al.Improving the uptake:barriers and facilitators to pulmonary rehabilitation[J].Clin Respir J,2019,13(10):624-629.
[6] 陈雪姣,何昕.肺癌患者术后心理困扰现状及其影响因素分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(24):3318-3322.
CHEN X J,HE X.Current status of postoperative psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and its influencing factors[J].Chin J Mod Nurs,2021,27(24):3318-3322.(in Chinese)
[7] 黄晓宇,耿明飞,周福有,等.吸气肌训练对食管癌根治术后患者心肺功能及生活质量的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2017,39(7):539-542.
HUANG X Y,GENG M F,ZHOU F Y,et al.Effects of inspiratory muscle training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in patients after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J].Chin J Phys Med Rehabil,2017,39(7):539-542.(in Chinese)
[8] 苏建华,车国卫.肺癌患者术前肺功能评定的现状与进展[J].中国肿瘤临床,2017,44(7):301-305.
SU J H,CHE G W.Current status and progress of preoperative pulmonary function evaluation in patients with lung cancer[J].Chin J Clin Oncol,2017,44(7):301-305.(in Chinese)
[9] 余俊杰,陈宝钧,程晶,等.胸腔镜下肺段或肺叶切除术对老年非小细胞肺癌患者肺功能及血气指标的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2024,44(14):3362-3366.
YU J J,CHEN B J,CHENG J,et al.Effect of thoracoscopic segmental or lobectomy on lung function and blood gas index in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chin J Gerontol,2024,44(14):3362-3366.(in Chinese)
[10] 姜格宁,张雷,朱余明,等.肺切除手术患者术前肺功能评估肺科共识[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(1):1-9.
JIANG G N,ZHANG L,ZHU Y M,et al.Pulmonary consensus on preoperative pulmonary function evaluation of patients undergoing pneumonectomy[J].Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2020,27(1):1-9.(in Chinese)
[11] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病工作委员会.慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2021年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2021,44(3):170-205.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Group of Chinese Thoracic Society,Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Committee of Chinese Association of Chest Physician.Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (revised version 2021)[J].Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis,2021,44(3):170-205.(in Chinese)
[12] 中国老年保健协会肺癌专业委员会,四川省康复医学会加速康复外科分会,成都康复医学会肺康复专业委员会.肺癌围手术期肺康复训练中国专家共识[J].中国肺癌杂志,2024,27(7):495-503.
Lung Cancer Specialty Committee of Chinese Elderly Health Care Association,Enhanced Recovery aster Surgery Specialty Committee of Sichuan Province Rehabilitation Medical Association,Lung Rehabilitation Specialty Committee of Chengdu Rehabilitation Medical Association.Chinese expert consensus on perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation training for lung cancer[J].Chin J Lung Cancer,2024,27(7):495-503.(in Chinese)
[13] 马俏俏,罗静,郝桂华,等.肺癌患者术后1个月体力活动水平现状及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(16):1979-1987.
MA Q Q,LUO J,HAO G H,et al.Analysis of the current state of physical activity levels and influencing factors in lung cancer patients a month post-surgery[J].Chin J Nurs,2024,59(16):1979-1987.(in Chinese)
[14] 邓婷,宋佳美,李金,等.肺癌术后肺部并发症风险预测模型的研究进展[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2025,32(2):263-269.
DENG T,SONG J M,LI J,et al.Research progress on risk prediction models of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery[J].Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2025,32(2):263-269.(in Chinese)
[15] 都菁,邓海波,刘磊,等.主动呼吸循环技术对非小细胞肺癌手术患者心肺功能影响研究[J].护理学报,2021,28(21):71-74.
DU J,DENG H B,LIU L,et al.Effect of active cycle of breathing technique on perioperative cardiopulmonary function of patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Nurs China,2021,28(21):71-74.(in Chinese)
[16] 冯霞,蔡小琼.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者综合呼吸训练肺康复效果评价[J].预防医学,2019,31(7):703-706.
FENG X,CAI X Q.Evaluation of pulmonary rehabilitation effects of comprehensive breathing training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].China Prev Med J,2019,31(7):703-706.(in Chinese)
[1] 王越, 黄晓彤, 赵菲, 丁莉莉, 吴炳义. 中晚期肺癌患者不同治疗方案对生命质量的影响[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 272-275.
[2] 裘凤黔, 赵俊峰, 陈玮华, 杜娟, 纪云芳, 高淑娜, 蒙洁, 何丽华, 陈博, 张艳. 2002—2019年黄浦区肺癌发病和死亡趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 143-147.
[3] 白勇, 李萍, 姜楠. 肥胖、外周血血脂指标与非小细胞肺癌的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 518-522.
[4] 项彩英, 汪德兵. 2011—2022年开化县肺癌发病和死亡趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 885-889.
[5] 胡碧波, 傅克本, 顾永权. 2011—2018年余姚市恶性肿瘤发病趋势[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 44-47,52.
[6] 王江峰, 杨诗雨, 李健强, 陈晟. 丹参酮ⅡA抑制肺癌细胞增殖研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(9): 893-897.
[7] 赵紫暄, 王乐, 王悠清, 杨易, 董恒进, 杜灵彬. DRGs实施前后温岭市肺癌患者就诊费用及个人负担比较[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 672-675.
[8] 李金, 黄文, 陈奇峰. 2014—2019年绍兴市肺癌发病趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 889-892.
[9] 陈静英, 朱匡纪. 2009-2018年婺城区肺癌死亡率变化趋势[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(2): 153-156.
[10] 林秀琴, 徐健, 许树红, 马岩, 方益荣. ADH、ALDH基因多态性与饮酒的交互作用对肺癌的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 1022-1025,1029.
[11] 方益荣, 马岩, 许树红, 裴迎新. 肺癌危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(7): 649-652.
[12] 冯惠春, 郑香琴, 王黎红, 周秋萍. 肺癌患者“放疗助手”APP健康教育效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 140-143.
[13] 徐艳平, 刘文学. 龙游县肺癌死亡及减寿趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(3): 266-269.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed