|
|
|
| Latent profile analysis of active health behaviors among elderly hospitalized patients with hypertension |
| MA Zongkang1, YE Jin2, FAN Jiao1, CAI Meiyi1, QI Yunhan2, CHEN Fenghui1
|
1. School of Nursing, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830017, China;
2. The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the latent classes of active health behaviors and influencing factors among elderly hospitalized patients with hypertension, so as to provide the evidence for improving active health behaviors among elderly patients with chronic diseases. Methods Using convenience sampling, hospitalized patients with hypertension aged ≥65 years were recruited from the hypertension, geriatrics, and cardiovascular departments of three Class A tertiary hospitals in Urumqi City. Demographic data, hypertension duration, hypertension grade, and cardiovascular risk stratification were collected through questionnaires. Anxiety, depression, cognition, and active health behaviors were assessed with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Active Health Behavior Scale for hypertensive patients, respectively. Latent profile analysis identified behavioral types, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors for active health behaviors among elderly hospitalized patients with hypertension. Results A total of 354 elderly hospitalized patients with hypertension were included, of whom 151 (42.66%) were males and 203 (57.34%) were females. The majority (233, 65.82%) were aged 65-<75 years. The mean score of active health behaviors was (105.79±5.82) points. Latent profile analysis classified the participants into two types: behavior-driven (76.55%) and responsibility-driven (23.45%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that, using the responsibility-driven type as the reference, patients with a middle school education level were more likely to belong to the behavior-driven type (OR=3.380, 95%CI: 1.244-9.185). In contrast, patients with a duration of hypertension exceeding 10 years (>10-20 years, OR=0.490, 95%CI: 0.273-0.880; >20 years, OR=0.383, 95%CI: 0.172-0.857), those with anxiety symptoms (OR=0.499, 95%CI: 0.283-0.881), and those with mild cognitive impairment (OR=0.456, 95%CI: 0.263-0.793) were less likely to belong to the behavior-driven type. Conclusions Active health behaviors among elderly hospitalized patients with hypertension exhibit two types: the behavior-driven type and the responsibility-driven type. The behavior-driven type was statistically associated with educational level, duration of hypertension, anxiety symptoms, and cognitive function.
|
|
Received: 15 May 2026
Revised: 01 July 2026
Published: 27 July 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中国老年医学学会高血压分会,北京高血压防治协会,国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(中国人民解放军总医院,首都医科大学宣武医院).中国老年高血压管理指南2023[J].中华高血压杂志,2023,31(6):508-538.
[2] 张梅,吴静,张笑,等.2018年中国成年居民高血压患病与控制状况研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(10):1780-1789.
[3] 刘仕俊,袁寒艳,姜彩霞,等.杭州市老年高血压患者血压控制的影响因素研究[J].预防医学,2021,33(7):661-664.
[4] 魏艺琳,张莉,陈芳菲,等.高血压患者主动健康行为量表编制[J].中国公共卫生,2023,39(3):370-374.
[5] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会,高血压联盟(中国),中国医疗保健国际交流促进会高血压病学分会,等.中国高血压防治指南(2024年修订版)[J].中华高血压杂志(中英文),2024,32(7):603-700.
[6] 朱天顺,朱可可,薛会元,等.高血压患者主动健康行为现状及影响因素研究[J].中国护理管理,2025,25(3):369-374.
[7] 陈高涵,许兴龙,周绿林.中老年人主动健康行为对其健康水平的影响研究:基于潜在剖面分析[J].中国卫生事业管理,2025,42(3):344-348.
[8] Mefford M T,Goyal P,Howard G,et al.The association of hypertension,hypertension duration,and control with incident heart failure in black and white adults[J].J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich),2020,22(5):857-866.
[9] Taylor C,Tillin T,Chaturvedi N,et al.Midlife hypertensive status and cognitive function 20 years later:the Southall and Brent revisited study[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2013,61(9):1489-1498.
[10] 中国营养学会肥胖防控分会,中国营养学会临床营养分会,中华预防医学会行为健康分会,等.中国居民肥胖防治专家共识[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2022,43(4):619-631.
[11] Doi S,Iwata H,Wada H,et al.A novel and simply calculated nutritional index serves as a useful prognostic indicator in patients with coronary artery disease[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,262:92-98.
[12] 中国血脂管理指南修订联合专家委员会.中国血脂管理指南(基层版2024年)[J].中国全科医学,2024,27(20):2429-2436.
[13] Spitzer R L,Kroenke K,Williams J B W,et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder:the GAD-7[J].Arch Intern Med,2006,166(10):1092-1097.
[14] 何筱衍,李春波,钱洁,等.广泛性焦虑量表在综合性医院的信度和效度研究[J].上海精神医学,2010,22(4):200-203.
[15] Sheikh J I,Yesavage J A.A knowledge assessment test for geriatric psychiatry[J].Hosp Community Psychiatry,1985,36(11):1160-1166.
[16] 唐丹.简版老年抑郁量表(GDS-15)在中国老年人中的使用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(3):402-405.
[17] Nasreddine Z S,Phillips N A,Bédirian V,et al.The Montreal Cognitive Assessment,MoCA:a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2005,53(4):695-699.
[18] 张立秀,刘雪琴.蒙特利尔认知评估量表中文版的信效度研究[J].护理研究,2007,21(31):2906-2907.
[19] Tein J Y,Coxe S,Cham H.Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis[J].Struct Equ Modeling,2013,20(4):640-657.
[20] Vincenzo J L,Patton S K,Lefler L L,et al.A qualitative study of older adults' facilitators,barriers,and cues to action to engage in falls prevention using health belief model constructs[J/OL].Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2022,99[2026-07-01].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2021.104610.
[21] Insel K,Einstein G,Morrow D,et al.Foundational basis for the development of MEDSReM[J/OL].Innov Aging,2021,5(Suppl.1)[2026-07-01].https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.880.
[22] 杨国红,蔡伟,石蕊,等.天津市河东区社区老年高血压患者知信行水平及其影响因素[J].武警医学,2024,35(12):1058-1061,1066.
[23] Mogg K,Bradley B P.A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety[J].Behav Res Ther,1998,36(9):809-848.
[24] Bubulac L,Zivari M,Eremia I A,et al.Stress,anxiety,and self-efficacy in hypertension:evidence from a Romanian case-control study[J/OL].Diseases,2025,13(11)[2026-07-01].https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13110373.
[25] Ma L Y,He F,Liu S,et al.The association between the prevalence,medication adherence and control of hypertension and the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in rural northern China:a cross-sectional study[J].Patient Prefer Adherence,2022,16:493-502. |
|
|
|
