Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (6): 474-478    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.06.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析
孙强1, 李小勇1, 龚清海2, 潘文杰3, 黄艳4
1.宁波市鄞州区疾病预防控制中心健康教育与慢性病防制科,浙江 宁波 315100;
2.宁波市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 宁波 315010;
3.鄞州区第三医院,浙江 宁波 315191;
4.宁波大学附属人民医院,浙江 宁波 315100
Association between latent class of health-risk behaviors and depressive symptoms among middle school students
SUN Qiang1, LI Xiaoyong1, GONG Qinghai2, PAN Wenjie3, HUANG Yan4
1. Department of Health Education and Chronic Disease Control, Yinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China;
2. Ningbo Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China;
3. The Third Hospital of Yinzhou, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315191, China;
4. Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China
全文: PDF(773 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关系,为预防和干预中学生抑郁症状提供依据。方法 采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法抽取浙江省宁波市鄞州区2所初中、2所高中和1所职业高中的在校学生进行问卷调查,收集人口学信息、健康相关行为等资料,采用流调中心抑郁量表调查抑郁症状;分析学生健康危险行为的潜在类别,并采用多因素logistic回归模型分析健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关系。结果 调查1 247人,男生641人,占51.40%;女生606人,占48.60%。初中452人,占36.25%;高中532人,占42.66%;职业高中263人,占21.09%。潜在类别分析分为行为健康组(52.93%)、饮食不良组(39.94%)和行为高危组(7.14%),抑郁症状检出率分别为7.12%、18.88%和52.81%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,调整年龄、性别、籍贯、独生子女和住校因素后,与行为健康组相比,饮食不良组(OR=3.107,95%CI:2.086~4.627)、行为高危组(OR=15.401,95%CI:9.031~26.262)发生抑郁症状的风险较高。结论 健康危险行为高危、饮食不良可能增加中学生抑郁症状发生风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙强
李小勇
龚清海
潘文杰
黄艳
关键词 中学生健康危险行为抑郁症状潜在类别分析    
AbstractObjective To analyze the association between latent class of health-risk behaviors and depressive symptoms among middle school students, so as to provide the evidence for the prevention and intervention of depressive symptoms among middle school students. Methods Students in two junior high schools, two senior high schools and one vocational high school in Yinzhou District, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, were selected using a stratified multi-stage cluster sampling method. Demography and health-risk behaviors were collected using questionnaire surveys, depressive symptoms were investigated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression-10 Scale, and latent class analysis was conducted for health-risk behaviors. The association between different latent classes and depressive symptoms was analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 1 247 students were surveyed, including 641 boys (51.40%) and 606 girls (48.60%). There were 452 junior high school students (36.25%), 532 high school students (42.66%) and 263 vocational high school students (21.09%). Latent class analysis showed that health-risk behaviors in students were classified into three groups, namely healthy behavior group (52.93%), poor diet group (39.94%) and high-risk behavior group (7.14%), and the detection rates of depressive symptoms were 7.12%, 18.88% and 52.81%, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between groups (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for age, gender, native place, only child and living on campus, the poor diet group (OR=3.107, 95%CI: 2.086-4.627) and high-risk behavior group (OR=15.401, 95%CI: 9.031-26.262) had higher risks of depressive symptoms compared with the healthy behavior group. Conclusion Having high-risk behaviors and poor diet may increase the risk of developing depressive symptoms among middle school students.
Key wordsmiddle school students    health-risk behavior    depressive symptoms    latent class analysis
收稿日期: 2024-03-15      修回日期: 2024-05-11      出版日期: 2024-06-10
中图分类号:  R193.3  
基金资助:宁波市科技公益类项目(2022S077); 浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LTGY24H260007)
作者简介: 孙强,硕士,医师,主要从事学校卫生工作
通信作者: 黄艳,E-mail:75688884@qq.com   
引用本文:   
孙强, 李小勇, 龚清海, 潘文杰, 黄艳. 中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
SUN Qiang, LI Xiaoyong, GONG Qinghai, PAN Wenjie, HUANG Yan. Association between latent class of health-risk behaviors and depressive symptoms among middle school students. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.06.004      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I6/474
[1] COSTELLO E J,EGGER H,ANGOLD A.10-year research update review:the epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders:I.methods and public health burden[J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2005,44(10):972-986.
[2] WINDFUHR K,WHILE D,HUNT I,et al.Suicide in juveniles and adolescents in the United Kingdom[J].J Child Psychol Psychiatry,2008,49(11):1155-1165.
[3] CLAYBORNE Z M,VARIN M,COLMAN I.Systematic review and meta-analysis:adolescent depression and long-term psychosocial outcomes[J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2019,58(1):72-79.
[4] 刘洋,张伟波,蔡军.初中生焦虑抑郁情绪与生活方式的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2017,31(3):235-240.
[5] 凌洁,张敬敏,赵玲慧.嘉兴市中小学生网络成瘾现况调查[J].预防医学,2022,34(12):1207-1211.
[6] 赵志雅. 心理控制源对大学生焦虑、抑郁的影响——健康危险行为的中介效应[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2021.
[7] RADLOFF L S.The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults[J].J Youth Adolesc,1991,20(2):149-166.
[8] 张雪晴,张珂欣,朱云娇,等.四种网络成瘾量表在大学生中应用评价[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(8):1193-1197.
[9] 侯常春,梁明玥,刘忠慧,等.天津市初中生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联[J].中国学校卫生,2023,44(3):423-427.
[10] 贾至慧,陈飞宇,李旭阳,等.江西省农村中小学生健康危险行为共发性及关联性[J].中国公共卫生,2022,38(1):29-32.
[11] 杨杨. 郑州市中学生健康危险行为状况及其影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2019,46(9):1595-1599.
[12] 卢小敏,赵继娟,孙中友,等.盐城市儿童青少年健康危险行为聚集情况调查[J].预防医学,2023,35(4):331-334.
[13] 李玖玲,陈星,赵春华,等.中国儿童青少年抑郁症状流行率的Meta分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(3):295-298.
[14] 王俊霞,张德勇,叶建武,等.莲都区中学生抑郁症状现况调查[J].浙江预防医学,2016,28(2):160-161,164.
[15] 郑利锋,杨开仁,谭素仙,等.青少年抑郁症状现况调查[J].预防医学,2018,30(4):338-340,344.
[16] 张丛笑,郑琳,沈利明,等.某区中小学生抑郁症状调查[J].预防医学,2023,35(3):196-199,204.
[17] 周海茸,洪忻,王志勇,等.南京中学生健康危险行为与抑郁症状关系[J].中国公共卫生,2015,31(1):49-52.
[18] DEAN J,KESHAVAN M.The neurobiology of depression:an integrated view[J].Asian J Psychiatr,2017,27:101-111.
[19] HU D,CHENG L,JIANG W.Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and the risk of depression:a meta-analysis of observational studies[J].J Affect Disord,2019,245:348-355.
[1] 王海琪, 张涵潇, 杨凤云, 国献丽, 范生荣, 张丽锋, 蒋泓. 嘉定区中学生抑郁情绪调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 832-836.
[2] 林飞云, 周敏聪, 陈晓雯. 高龄经产妇产后抑郁症状及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 732-736.
[3] 李忠莲, 莫显刚, 秦素霞, 周全湘, 朱亚芬, 莫才云, 易艾晶, 陈举海. 农村老年慢性病患者孤独感、抑郁症状在家庭功能与生活满意度间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 551-556,561.
[4] 梁茵茵, 袁瑞, 刘光涛, 李辉, 付云. 湖州市中学生抑郁症状现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 622-627,631.
[5] 王熙, 乔婷婷. 老年人日常生活活动能力、社会参与在抑郁症状与认知功能间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 438-442.
[6] 陆丽君, 袁磊, 李殿江, 卢昆, 朱怡萱, 王志勇, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我管理行为在抑郁症状与血糖控制间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 455-459.
[7] 蒋安然, 朱煜典, 鲁芬, 方大春, 翟光富. 膳食行为与中学生超重肥胖的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 341-345.
[8] 胡晓凤, 刘力勇, 马石头, 刘高山, 安欣华. 石景山区中学生吸烟态度和行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 421-424.
[9] 王尊晖, 张丛笑, 沈利明, 陈晖, 牛星凯. 西湖区中老年人群抑郁症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 296-299.
[10] 段文静, 谢煜相, 羊姝, 崔依婷, 彭爱, 黄鹏. 中学生非自杀性自伤风险的潜在剖面分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 118-122.
[11] 见明智, 鲁迪, 蒋婷婷, 陈洁. 中学生电子烟尝试使用的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 208-211,216.
[12] 黄健玲, 曾静, 罗锐, 顾菁. 职业高中学生电子烟使用及尝试意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 201-207.
[13] 陈春棉, 金婷婷, 高思, 陈浩然, 卢晓远, 郑丽丹. 抑郁症患者出院后“互联网+”延续干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1049-1053.
[14] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 杨玉婷, 王静夷, 陈潇潇. 台州市中学生心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 821-824.
[15] 邢玉萍, 邢辉, 李淼, 高燕. 中老年人群抑郁症状与衰弱的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 649-653.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed