Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (3): 218-223    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.03.008
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
肠镜检查人群多靶点粪便DNA检测意愿的影响因素分析
吕乐彬1, 樊金卿2, 赵王芳2, 陆启文2, 顾俊娣2, 高菡璐2
1.宁波大学医学院,浙江 宁波 315000;
2.宁波大学医学院附属医院,浙江 宁波 315000
Willingness and influencing factors of multitarget stool DNA testing among individuals receiving colonoscopy screening
LÜ Lebin1, FAN Jinqing2, ZHAO Wangfang2, LU Qiwen2, GU Jundi2, GAO Hanlu2
1. Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China;
2. The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China
全文: PDF(897 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析肠镜检查人群多靶点粪便DNA(MT-sDNA)检测接受意愿和支付意愿的影响因素,为结直肠癌筛查策略制定和卫生经济学评价提供依据。方法 选择2021年8月—2022年3月在宁波大学医学院附属医院进行肠镜检查的40~75岁人群为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集基本信息、生活行为、家族史、MT-sDNA检测接受意愿和支付意愿等资料,采用多因素logistic回归模型分析MT-sDNA检测接受意愿和支付意愿的影响因素。结果 调查546人,年龄为(56.25±8.66)岁;男性282人,占51.65%。愿意接受MT-sDNA检测504人,占92.31%;愿意支付MT-sDNA检测费用480人,占88.24%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示:有一级亲属结直肠癌家族史(OR=0.246,95%CI:0.068~0.888)、有痔疮史(OR=0.300,95%CI:0.109~0.826)的肠镜检查人群MT-sDNA检测接受意愿较低;认可MT-sDNA检测可靠性(OR=5.749,95%CI:1.480~22.323)、认为MT-sDNA检测取样没有困难(OR=32.042,95%CI:6.666~154.021)和有一定难度(OR=20.278,95%CI:4.405~93.354)的肠镜检查人群MT-sDNA检测接受意愿较高;认可(OR=5.003,95%CI:1.761~14.216)和担心(OR=4.166,95%CI:1.285~13.501)MT-sDNA检测可靠性、认为MT-sDNA检测取样没有困难(OR=6.558,95%CI:2.105~20.428)和有一定难度(OR=5.820,95%CI:1.810~18.720)的肠镜检查人群MT-sDNA检测支付意愿较高。结论 一级亲属结直肠癌家族史、痔疮史和MT-sDNA检测的认知程度是肠镜检查人群MT-sDNA检测接受意愿和支付意愿的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吕乐彬
樊金卿
赵王芳
陆启文
顾俊娣
高菡璐
关键词 结直肠癌多靶点粪便DNA检测肠镜检查    
AbstractObjective To investigate the willingness to receiving multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing and factors affecting the payment among individuals receiving colonoscopy screening, so as to provide the evidence for the formulation and health economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening strategies. Methods Individuals at ages of 40 to 75 years that received colonoscopy screening in The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Medical School from August 2021 to March 2022 were sampled. Participants' demographics, living behaviors, family history, willingness to receive MT-sDNA testing and willingness to pay for MT-sDNA testing were collected using questionnaire surveys, and factors affecting the willingness to receive and pay for MT-sDNA testing were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 546 respondents were enrolled, with a mean age of (56.25±8.66) years and including 282 men (51.65%). There were 504 respondents that were willing to receiving MT-sDNA testing (92.31%) and 480 that were willing to pay for the MT-sDNA testing (88.24%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that a family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives (OR=0.246, 95%CI: 0.068-0.888), history of hemorrhoids (OR=0.300, 95%CI: 0.109-0.826) resulted in low willingness to receive MT-sDNA testing, and recognizing the reliability of MT-sDNA testing (OR=5.749, 95%CI: 1.480-22.323), considering no difficulty in sampling for MT-sDNA testing (OR=32.042, 95%CI: 6.666-154.021) and considering a difficulty in sampling for MT-sDNA testing (OR=20.278, 95%CI: 4.405-93.354) resulted in high willingness to receive MT-sDNA testing, while recognizing the reliability of MT-sDNA testing (OR=5.003, 95%CI: 1.761-14.216), concern about the reliability of MT-sDNA testing (OR=4.166, 95%CI: 1.285-13.501), considering no difficulty in sampling for MT-sDNA testing (OR=6.558, 95%CI: 2.105-20.428) and considering a difficulty in sampling for MT-sDNA testing (OR=5.820, 95%CI: 1.810-18.720) resulted in high willingness to pay for the MT-sDNA testing among individuals receiving colonoscopy screening. Conclusion A family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives, history of hemorrhoids and awareness of MT-sDNA testing are factors affecting the willingness to receive and pay for the MT-sDNA testing among individuals receiving colonoscopy screening.
Key wordscolorectal cancer    multitarget stool DNA testing    colonoscopy screening
收稿日期: 2022-11-01      修回日期: 2023-01-19      出版日期: 2023-03-10
中图分类号:  R735.3  
基金资助:浙江省医药科技计划项目(2021KY1048,2022KY1142); 宁波市卫生健康青年技术骨干人才培养专项(2020SWSQNGG-02); 宁波市重大科技任务攻关项目(2021Z133)
作者简介: 吕乐彬,硕士研究生在读
通信作者: 高菡璐,E-mail:306646058@qq.com   
引用本文:   
吕乐彬, 樊金卿, 赵王芳, 陆启文, 顾俊娣, 高菡璐. 肠镜检查人群多靶点粪便DNA检测意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 218-223.
LÜ Lebin, FAN Jinqing, ZHAO Wangfang, LU Qiwen, GU Jundi, GAO Hanlu. Willingness and influencing factors of multitarget stool DNA testing among individuals receiving colonoscopy screening. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(3): 218-223.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.03.008      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I3/218
[1] ZHENG R,ZHANG S,ZENG H,et al.Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2016[J].J Natl Cancer Inst, 2022,2(1):1-9.
[2] 李昱剑,买买提依力·阿布都瓦依提,崔博豪,等.新疆地区维吾尔族居民结直肠癌结肠镜筛查依从性及其影响因素研究[J].中国社会医学杂志,2022,39(3):324-328.
[3] 郑沛,卢丽微,朱福乾,等.永嘉县结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(7):727-731.
[4] KOI M,OKITA Y,CARETHERS J M.Fusobacterium nucleatum infection in colorectal cancer:linking inflammation,DNA mismatch repair and genetic and epigenetic alterations[J].J Anus Rectum Colon,2018,2(2):37-46.
[5] 国家癌症中心中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组.中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020,北京)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2021,43(1):16-38.
[6] 安锦慧,孙治平,李云涛,等.我国结直肠癌筛查的影响因素文献分析及思考[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(23):2877-2882.
[7] 刘宇英,李艳红,严岳,等.结直肠癌发病风险预测模型的建立及应用[J].护理学报,2020,27(16):65-69.
[8] 郭兰伟,张韶凯,刘曙正,等.2013—2019年河南省城市癌症早诊早治项目地区人群结肠镜筛查结果和依从性分析[J].中华预防医学杂志,2021,55(3):353-358.
[9] SUNG J J Y,WONG M C S,LAM T Y T,et al.A modified colorectal screening score for prediction of advanced neoplasia:a prospective study of 5 744 subjects[J].J Gastroentero Hepatol,2018,33(1):187-194.
[10] BUTTERLY L F.Proven strategies for increasing adherence to colorectal cancer screening[J].Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am,2020,30(3):377-392.
[11] 郭晔,王洪丽,刘莹,等.社区居民结直肠癌筛查认知及肠镜检查依从性影响分析[J].中国社区医师,2022,38(13):126-128.
[12] ZHU X,PARKS P D,WEISER E,et al.Barriers to utilization of three colorectal cancer screening options - data from a national survey[J/OL].Prev Med Rep,2021,24[2023-01-19].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101508.
[13] 郑树,张苏展,蔡三军,等.中国结直肠肿瘤早诊筛查策略专家共识[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(10):1081-1086.
[14] 彭晨,蒋小华,姜景蔚,等.多靶点粪便基因检测在社区结直肠癌筛查中的应用价值研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(25):3132-3135.
[15] 马志刚,朱晓麟,马丽红,等.基于多靶点粪便FIT-DNA联合检测技术的结直肠癌早期筛查结果分析[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2019,8(6):616-621.
[1] 周凡, 王小红, 陈梦倩, 张小兰, 徐则林. 2016—2027年金华市结直肠癌发病和死亡趋势分析及预测[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 26-30.
[2] 李玉荣, 王冬飞, 高媛媛, 蒋园园, 林君英, 肖段段. 2010—2024年萧山区结直肠癌发病趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 927-931,936.
[3] 张莹, 陈伊绚, 高玥, 王晔, 李剑森, 韩毓桐, 魏文强, 廖羽. 2020年广东省肿瘤登记地区结直肠癌流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 997-1001.
[4] 陈铭睿, 林玲, 楚楚, 黄捷, 韩亚蓉, 蔡波, 韩颖颖. 2013—2022年南通市结直肠癌发病和死亡趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1039-1044.
[5] 蒋鸣孝, 李剑, 黄旭云. 上城区结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 501-505.
[6] 和金金, 朱陈, 潘婷婷, 黄文雯, 蒋秉洁, 余炜燕, 王乐, 吴维妙, 杭栋, 杜灵彬. 定性和定量粪便免疫化学试验筛查结直肠癌效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 317-321.
[7] 陈淑淑, 龚巍巍, 关云琦, 周晓燕, 潘劲, 戴品远, 王浩, 李娜, 俞敏. 1990—2019年浙江省结直肠癌疾病负担和危险因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 203-206.
[8] 高菡璐, 俞晓芳, 吕乐彬, 叶国良, 樊金卿. 多靶点粪便DNA、肠道菌群、癌胚抗原及水果摄入对结直肠癌风险的交互作用研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 219-223.
[9] 沈方力, 茅俭英, 孟杨, 朱礼明, 柏红, 汤德珍, 刘世友. 宝山区居民结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 869-872,877.
[10] 曾龙武, 唐晓鸿, 张素霞, 刘强, 梁朝聪, 唐漫漫. 结直肠癌化疗患者照护人疾病不确定感影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 444-447.
[11] 郑沛, 卢丽微, 朱福乾, 戴曙杰. 永嘉县结直肠癌筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 727-731.
[12] 倪卫桂, 余勇, 谢悦, 汪敬轩, 陈婷婷, 杨春霞. 成都市结直肠癌患者抑郁症状的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 147-150.
[13] 张晓海, 施惠娟, 张洪涛, 钟华, 姚敏, 谭又吉. 麻风病治愈患者结直肠癌及癌前病变的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(12): 1257-1261.
[14] 陈奇峰, 陈康康, 李金, 屠春雨. 2011—2019年绍兴市结直肠癌发病趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1146-1148.
[15] 梅少林, 刘晓红, 杜冬明, 杨延平, 尤丹. 丽水市居民结直肠癌发病与死亡趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 666-669.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed