Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (5): 392-395    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
跨性别群体抑郁、焦虑与防御机制研究
王占强1, 董瀚文1, 邸晓兰2, 杨可冰2, 牛雅娟2
1.承德医学院心理系,河北 承德 067000;
2.北京回龙观医院,北京 100096
Depression, anxiety and defense mechanism among transgender populations
WANG Zhanqiang1, DONG Hanwen1, DI Xiaolan2, YANG Kebing2, NIU Yajuan2
1. Department of Psychology, Chengde Medical College, Chengde, Hebei 067000, China;
2. Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing 100096, China
全文: PDF(788 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解跨性别群体抑郁和焦虑状况及其与防御机制的关系,为改善跨性别群体心理健康提供依据。方法 选择2020年12月—2021年12月首次就诊于北京回龙观医院性心理门诊的跨性别者为调查对象,采用自编一般情况调查表、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、防御机制问卷(DSQ)收集调查对象人口学资料、抑郁、焦虑和防御机制类型情况;采用多因素logistic回归模型分析抑郁、焦虑的影响因素。结果 调查跨性别者126人,其中男性95人,占75.40%,年龄为(21.53±4.55)岁;女性31人,占24.60%,年龄为(23.58±5.55)岁。检出抑郁59例,检出率为46.83%;其中轻度、中度、重度抑郁分别占44.07%、30.51%和25.42%。检出焦虑33例,检出率为26.19%;其中轻度、中度和重度焦虑分别占60.61%、21.21%和18.18%。男性抑郁检出率为54.74%,高于女性的22.58%;有过自伤自杀行为者抑郁和焦虑检出率分别为62.79%和41.86%,均高于无自伤自杀行为者的38.55%和18.07%(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,不成熟型防御机制增加跨性别群体发生抑郁(OR=1.034,95%CI:1.018~1.051)、焦虑的风险(OR=1.031,95%CI:1.014~1.049),而成熟型防御机制降低跨性别群体发生抑郁(OR=0.887,95%CI:0.832~0.946)、焦虑的风险(OR=0.878,95%CI:0.821~0.938)。结论 本次调查的跨性别群体分别有46.83%和26.19%检出抑郁和焦虑,采取成熟型防御机制有助于降低跨性别群体抑郁、焦虑风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王占强
董瀚文
邸晓兰
杨可冰
牛雅娟
关键词 跨性别群体抑郁焦虑防御机制    
AbstractObjective To investigate the prevalence of depression and anxiety among transgender populations and the correlation with defense mechanism, so as to provide the evidence for improving mental health among transgender populations. Methods Transgender populations that visited Psychosexual Outpatient Department of Beijing Huilongguan Hospital for the first time from December 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. Participants' demographics, depression, anxiety and type of defense mechanisms were collected using self-designed questionnaires, Self-rating Depression Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). Factors affecting depression and anxiety were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results Totally 126 transgender individuals were enrolled, including 95 men (75.40%) with a mean age of (21.53±4.55) years and 31 women (24.60%) with a mean age of (23.58±5.55) years. The prevalence of depression was 46.83% among participants, including 44.07% of participants with mild depression, 30.51% with moderate depression and 25.42% with severe depression, and the prevalence of anxiety was 26.19% among participants, including 60.61% of participants with mild anxiety, 21.21% with moderate anxiety and 18.18% with severe anxiety. The detection of depression was 54.74% among men and 22.58% among women (P<0.05), and the detection of both depression (62.79% vs. 38.55%, P<0.05) and anxiety (41.86% vs. 18.07%, P<0.05) was significantly higher among transgender populations with self-injury or suicide behaviors than among those without. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that immature defense mechanisms increased the risk of depression (OR=1.034, 95%CI: 1.018-1.051) and anxiety (OR=1.031, 95%CI: 1.014-1.049) among transgender populations, while mature defense mechanisms reduced the risk of depression (OR=0.887, 95%CI: 0.832-0.946) and anxiety (OR=0.878, 95%CI: 0.821-0.938) among transgender populations. Conclusions The prevalence of depression and anxiety was 46.83% and 26.19% among transgender populations included in this study. Mature defense mechanisms are beneficial to reduce the risk of depression and anxiety among transgender populations.
Key wordstransgender population    depression    anxiety    defense mechanism
收稿日期: 2021-11-04      修回日期: 2023-03-21      出版日期: 2023-05-10
中图分类号:  R749.99  
作者简介: 王占强,硕士研究生在读
通信作者: 牛雅娟,E-mail:niuyajuan@126.com   
引用本文:   
王占强, 董瀚文, 邸晓兰, 杨可冰, 牛雅娟. 跨性别群体抑郁、焦虑与防御机制研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 392-395.
WANG Zhanqiang, DONG Hanwen, DI Xiaolan, YANG Kebing, NIU Yajuan. Depression, anxiety and defense mechanism among transgender populations. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 392-395.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.006      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I5/392
[1] DISANTOSTEFANO J.International classification of diseases 10th revision(ICD-10)[J]. J Nurse Pract,2010,5(1):56-57.
[2] 夏楠,刘爱忠.跨性别者的心理健康问题(综述)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2021,35(3):231-235.
[3] 北京同志中心,北京大学社会学系.2017年中国跨性别群体生存现状调查报告[R].2017.
[4] 刘贤臣,唐茂芹,陈琨,等.SDS和CES-D对大学生抑郁症状评定结果的比较[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(1):19-20,37.
[5] 乔艳阳,王健,张春雨.焦虑自评量表在公务员群体中的信效度检验及区域性常模的制定[J].心理学进展,2022,12(6):2269-2278.
[6] 路敦跃,张丽杰,赵瑞,等.防御方式问卷初步试用结果[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(2):53-56,94.
[7] 李宁宁. 《防御方式问卷》验证性信效度分析[D].大连:大连医科大学,2013.
[8] STANTON A M, BATCHELDER A W.Differences in mental health symptom severity and care engagement among transgender and gender diverse individuals:findings from a large community health center[J]. PLoS One,2021,16(1):245-248.
[9] CHANG R,ZENG C,QIAO S,et al.The mediating effect of depression on the relation between interpersonal needs and suicidal ideation among Chinese transgender women[J]. Front Public Health,2022,9(1):76-78.
[10] WANG Y, HU Z.Mapping out a spectrum of the Chinese public's discrimination toward the LGBT community:results from a national survey[J]. BMC Public Health,2020,20(1):669-672.
[11] HUA B,YANG V F,GOLDSEN K F.LGBT older adults at a crossroads in mainland China:the intersections of stigma,cultural values,and structural changes within a shifting context[J]. Int J Aging Hum Dev,2019,88(4):440-456.
[12] WANG Y,WILSON A,CHEN R,et al.Behind the rainbow,"Tongqi" wives of men who have sex with men in China:a systematic review[J]. Front Psychol,2020,10(5):29-32.
[13] HU X,WANG Y.LGB identity among young Chinese:the influence of traditional culture[J]. J Homosex,2013,60(5):667-672.
[14] ZILCHA-MANO S.Toward personalized psychotherapy:the importance of the trait-like/state-like distinction for understanding therapeutic change[J]. Am Psychol,2021,76(3):516-528.
[15] VAILLANT G E.Involuntary coping mechanisms:a psychodynamic perspective[J].Dialogues Clin Neurosci,2011,13(3):366-370.
[16] JUN J Y,LEE Y J.Association between defense mechanisms and psychiatric symptoms in North Korean Refugees[J]. Compr Psychiatry,2015,56(3):179-182.
[17] 叶帆,王江梅.心理干预结合药物治疗对青少年抑郁患者心理防御机制的影响研究[J].心理月刊,2021,16(9):43-44,56.
[18] SUN M, JI H, CHEN X, et al.The factors influencing the psychological distress of transgender women in Shandong, China: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Public Health,2022,22(1):955-967.
[1] 朱思雨, 吴静, 应佳瑶, 综述, 宋培歌, 审校. 童年期不良经历与抑郁、焦虑关联的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 913-916,921.
[2] 宋臻, 张嘉怡, 吴大东, 综述;龚霓, 审校. 围产期抑郁数字健康干预平台的研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 907-912.
[3] 王海琪, 张涵潇, 杨凤云, 国献丽, 范生荣, 张丽锋, 蒋泓. 嘉定区中学生抑郁情绪调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 832-836.
[4] 林飞云, 周敏聪, 陈晓雯. 高龄经产妇产后抑郁症状及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 732-736.
[5] 李忠莲, 莫显刚, 秦素霞, 周全湘, 朱亚芬, 莫才云, 易艾晶, 陈举海. 农村老年慢性病患者孤独感、抑郁症状在家庭功能与生活满意度间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 551-556,561.
[6] 白茂潮, 李芬, 地力努尔·吐尔逊, 热米拉·热扎克, 王岩. HPV感染女性焦虑症状的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 573-577,582.
[7] 何靖恺, 胡洁琼, 张加玏, 季蕴辛. 肠道菌群代谢产物与抑郁障碍研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 583-587.
[8] 梁茵茵, 袁瑞, 刘光涛, 李辉, 付云. 湖州市中学生抑郁症状现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 622-627,631.
[9] 王熙, 乔婷婷. 老年人日常生活活动能力、社会参与在抑郁症状与认知功能间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 438-442.
[10] 陆丽君, 袁磊, 李殿江, 卢昆, 朱怡萱, 王志勇, 刘思浚. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我效能、自我管理行为在抑郁症状与血糖控制间的中介效应分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 455-459.
[11] 王尊晖, 张丛笑, 沈利明, 陈晖, 牛星凯. 西湖区中老年人群抑郁症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 296-299.
[12] 陈春棉, 金婷婷, 高思, 陈浩然, 卢晓远, 郑丽丹. 抑郁症患者出院后“互联网+”延续干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1049-1053.
[13] 张文丽, 张丽, 胡在方, 周国伟, 胡洁. 北京市某区制造业工人抑郁、焦虑症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 796-800.
[14] 邢玉萍, 邢辉, 李淼, 高燕. 中老年人群抑郁症状与衰弱的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 649-653.
[15] 张媛媛, 汪文, 唐新龙, 江爱国. 青少年非自杀性自伤的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 553-557.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed